Comments by footballguy (page 4)

Seems to me that if the girl is attractive enough she would make more money being an escort than she would doing porn. Many articles have said that the most popular porn stars only make about $1,000 for a standard boy/girl scene and can make a couple hundred more for additional things like anal. I know I overpaid when I saw my OTC ($800 for a couple hours typically) but I also consider her to be a DS so she was worth it. Seems like there would be less effort to be a mid level escort than an average paid porn star. If they have a recurring list of a few regular clients they could easily make a couple thousand a month. Seems like it would be less work than spending multiple hours on a film set plus not having the cost of either flying to or living in LA or Vegas or shoot the scenes. I guess some women feel like the porn route is safer.

https://mobile.twitter.com/CarlieJoHowell/status/800773558926381058/photo/1 All I can say is...wow!

This question leaves room to interpretation. The least attractive dancer could theoretically still be above average if the rest of the dancers or 8's and 9's. That being said, I could handle getting dances from the least attractive dancer as long as she had and decent body but if she had small tits or was too skinny than forget it, I'll go with the air dance.

She posted a nice pic (and a gif to go with it) this morning. You can see a pretty clear outline of her nipple. Man I wish she would post a completely topless pic.

I think a lot of them choose to not remember or acknowledge that it happened. I had been seeing my ATF weekly ITC and had gotten HJ's every week with occasional DATY. After a couple months of visits she dozed off while on my laps during an hour long VIP. I let her sleep for a couple minutes but gradually nudged her a couple times since I hadn't gotten my HJ yet. She woke off but kind of dozed off again. After a little while she finally started dancing again but our time expired before she could start the HJ. She said she felt terrible and she'd make it up to me by giving me a free 15 minute VIP (I just had to pay the house fee which wasn't that much). At first I was skeptical and thought it was a ROB attempt at getting more money but next thing I know she's giving me a BBBJ. Over the next few minutes she mentioned that lots of guys offered her money for BJ's or sex but she always turned them down. I get like telling her "really? You gave me a BK just a couple weeks ago!" Then again I never offered her x amount of $ for a BJ so I guess technically she could have been right. Anyway shortly after that we started our FD OTC P4P and occasionally did BBFS with her (first time I met her OTC she stuck it right in with no condom and no hesitation). Over the next couple years she mentioned how she only gave HJ's of the money was right, no "mouth or pussy stuff" other than a Dr she met weekly OTC years ago for FS. So I'm either incredibly lucky or she's lying. I'm gonna go with the latter.

@SJG The shop is called Bikini Beans Expresso, it's located in Kent, WA. No website but if you google it you can look up the address easily. I wish I lived in the NW, I'd take a drive to check it out sometime but since I live in the east I don't think I'll ever get the chance (I don't get any business trips). I don't know for sure but the place looks pretty small, it might be a drive through only place but it might have a small walk up counter. I also wonder why she calls it bikini beans, she wears less than a bikini, not that I'm complaining. Here's some more pics, the third one is a pic of her pre boob job for you natural only guys. http://thechive.com/2015/11/13/barista-stand-has-a-near-perfect-rating-i-wonder-why-13-photos/

They are fake, she's called in on a radio show a few times and confirmed they are fake. But speaking as a guy that doesn't mind fake tits as long as they aren't rock hard (which only one dancer out of probably 15-20 dancers that have had fake tits were hard) I think they look perfect.

Gawker you should definitely be excited. Nude pics and videos are nice but a video clip of an ATF fucking a guy is the holly grail of stripper pics/vids (even if you have to see her fucking someone else). If the BJ vid was too big for her to send you then a FS vid would definitely be too big. Maybe you should recommend to her that she takes a few smaller videos instead of one big one.

I agree with the above, I imagine most guys are too rough and sometimes they might be sore cause of her period. And I'm sure sometimes it's because they just don't want to be touched. I always thought women enjoyed it a lot more when you caress their tits. I wouldn't say I'm rough with tits but I definitely love squeezing them. Most of the time the dancers don't say anything. Ive had one that I had to start off not squeezing at all and then each visit I squeezed more and more. But that was because she had just gotten her tits done so they were still tender (and that was actually the reason, I had seen her earlier and she was an A cup). I've had some regulars that normally don't mind if I squeeze but every once and a while they'll ask me to be gentle, must be cause they are in their period. And I've had 3 or 4 favorites that encourage me to squeeze as hard as I want , nothing better than that.

I had a favorite dancer I saw ITC regularly for a few months. After a few more months I had changed my schedule and I didn't see her for probably two to three months. Anyway I finally saw her again and while she didn't seem any bigger her tits definitely were a cup size bigger but they were still natural. When she mentioned they were bigger she said she thought she was pregnant at first but turned out she wasn't. I've seen her FB page though and not only was she actually pregnant at that time she gave birth some time later. I didn't mind that she was pregnant cause she wasn't showing and her pregnant tits were the best I've ever felt n

Stripper (during a lap dance): Have you ever titty fucked a girl before? Me: No but I've always wanted to. Stripper: Do you want to titty fuck me in the VIP room and cum all over my tits? I took her up on the offer and she loved up to her promise Another time during a lap dance with a different stripper with a perfect body and nice big fake tits: (I ask how much she charges for VIP, she replies with double the standard amount) Me: I repeat back the amount as if I'm asking a question. Stripper: yes $200...but that's all inclusive and I have everything we need. (shows me a condom). She too lived up to her promise.

I assume when you say meeting you mean more like what pornstars would we like to meet and fuck? My list would be fairly big: Madison Ivy (although she was in a real bad accident over a year ago and is still recovering and probably won't do porn again) Keisha Grey Samantha Saint Alexis Adams Abigail Mac Abella Danger Ashley Sinclair Christy Mack Jessa Rhodes (didn't like her before but I lover her new tits)

think they look good too and it's something different. But I prefer round them natural, it's not that the hearts look bad, I just think the natural look is better. I wonder if there's any women that have had them changed to something other than a heart.

My ATF had perfect areolas and nipples. Pornstar Ashley Sonclair also has just about perfect areolas in my opinion (and I think her tits are some of the best I've ever seen). http://namethatporn.com/buff/displays/4TSL7A5BSGGBA_whats-the-name-of-this-pornstar.jpg

@TwentyFive No, obviously no one deserves to get killed or arrested over a busted tail light. I never said a cop should be able to use lethal force whenever they want. But if the cop feels his life or someone else's life is in immediate danger, then maybe shooting them is justified. I'm sure he wasn't shot because of the busted tail light. The cop probably felt threatened and in danger and that's why he shot him. Even though the victim may very well had had no intention of harming the cop, it ultimately comes down to perception and how the cop felt. If it turns out to be proven that the victim did everything right and did not once reach for something without being told to then the cop deserves whatever comes his way. But that hasn't been proven yet. What happened to being innocent until proven guilty? Why can't we say it's a tragic event event that resulted in someone losing their life and not blame either party until all the facts have come out? It is also possible (and very likely) that the whole thing was a misunderstanding and ultimately no one was at fault since the cop might have legitimately felt threatened. Why he may have felt threatened though can be justified since it could be because he was black. That is something that needs to change but there is no easy fix. On a separate note, with this whole black lives matter movement, why are they only protesting black people being killed by white officers? Why don't they seem to care about all the random shootings and murders that take place daily in places like Chicago, Detroit, Cleveland, etc?

This is an excellent article I read about why we shouldn't rush to judgement, I couldn't have said it better myself. This article was aimed at the Louisiana incident but this also applies to the Minnesotta incident. I just don't understand why everyone is taking what this woman is saying as 100% accurate. Yes is the trouble a guy died, but we do NOT know what happened leading up to the shooting. Maybe she is telling the truth, maybe he was reaching for his license as he was telling the cop he had a gun which could easily make the cop feel threatened. I'm not speaking specifically to this shooting but every time an innocent person of any race dies, how does every person describe the victim on the news? They were a great person, great father/mother, loved by everyone, etc. You never hear the negative thing about that person. https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.cnn.com/cnn/2016/07/06/opinions/baton-rouge-alton-sterling-police-philip-holloway/index.html#

@TwentyFive yes, you did basically say cops should not have guns. You said that maybe cops should not be allowed to use any means necessary to stop someone. So since lethal force is the last line of defense, that would be to first authority to take away from them. So if they wouldn't be allowed to use lethal force then they wouldn't need a gun according to your rational.

@twentyfive I disagree with your point. Yes this needs to stop, but taking away guns from cops is just a horrible idea. The only time a cop should use lethal force is when they feel their life or the life of innocent people is in danger. That is the policy with any police force, the problem is its up to a cops personal judgment of a situation with only seconds to evaluate he situation and then make a decision. And what's the alternative if they did get their guns taken away. Then it would be the opposite problem, cops would get killed by criminals when it could have been prevented. Either scenario is terrible and neither one should happen. The sad thing is no amount of training can prepare you for a real life situation. I'd like to think there aren't any cops out there that would shoot someone cause they would think "well this guy just murdered someone so I'll just save the courts time and tax payer dollars so I'll just shoot him now instead of him going through trial and eventually getting convicted".

@a21985 I do feel very bad for the man that was shot and his family, obviously he didn't deserve to die. And shooting someone definitely should be the absolute last resort for a cop. It is a shame that this time of this does seem to be happening more and more and something needs to be done to stop it. Im not trying to take one side or the other. Why isn't it possible for me to feel bad for the guy that was shot but also want to wait for more information to come out before tearing into the cop. What's the harm in waiting for the facts? But seriously, thank you for having a rational conversation about this. I respect your opinion. I do think that body cameras are probably the only thing that is going to help keep this from happening again. But even then it is still dependent on the video being a good angle and showing everything.

I'm just trying to say, try to look at it from the cops point of view. I'm not saying what he did was right. But they put themselves in dangerous situations and often times have less than a second to decide how to react. Just hesitating less than a second can be the difference between the cop getting shot or defending themselves. Again, im not defending the cop. I just hate how if someone doesn't agree with someone else on this topic that person is automatically a racist and an idiot. There will probably be a situation sometime where a guy will have a gun and a cop will hesitate to shoot because he's afraid he will go to jail, then the cop will get shot and more people could end up getting shot as a result. Then everyone will blame the cop for not taking action faster. It's a lose lose situation.

@a21985 No, it doesn't. I'm not at all saying that the guy deserves to die or was going to shoot the cop. I think jester said it best, he was probably reaching for his license as he was saying he was carrying a licensed firearm and the cop freaked out. I'm just trying to see this from both the cops and the victims point of view. I just don't like that as a country we are so quick to rush to judgement based on a video of the aftermath of the shooting. My biggest problem with the Michael Brown controversy was how the media handled it. The picture of him that they showed 99% of the time was the picture of him sitting in a chair with headphones on. He looked like an average sized kid. But there were other pictures out there of him standing up and it gave you a sense of how big and strong he was, especially for a 14 year old kid. He looked like he could have been 20. But the media focused on the other pick because it made him look harmless.

I wish everyone would just wait until all the facts come out before rushing to judgment. There are three sides to every story: the victims side of it, the cops side of it, and what actually happened (something in between). I find it very odd that this woman was so calm after her boyfriend was shot. Why was her voice so calm? Why did she call the officer that shot him sir? Why wasn't she comforting her boyfriend as he lay there dying? She claims he was told the police he had a gun and a license for it and the cop told him to get his license and then he got shot for no reason. That's what she is saying but there's no proof so far that's how it happened. It's her word against theirs. She said he put his hands up like he was told and got shot. For all we know he had his gun is his hand while he was putting his hands up. Even if you have no intention of shooting you don't put your hands up when you are holding a gun.

I've never really had a dancer straight up tell me we could fuck or I'd get a BJ, those things usually happened on their own or with a little negotiation. I've had a couple strippers ask me if I wanted to titty fuck them and cum on their tits. I've one dancer tell me her VIP cost was all inclusive (and it was). I asked one dancer what a specific amount of money would get me in the VIP and she said she'd fuck me (and she did). I had one dancer that was giving me a BBBJ, when I was getting close to finishing I asked her where I should cum (something I should have negotiated before hand I suppose) but she surprised me and said anywhere I wanted. She let me cum in her mouth.

I'm not anti-gun but I don't see any reason why the average person should be able to buy an assault rifle. I understand people want to defend themselves but do you really need a high powered assault rifle to feel safe? I'm pretty sure that when the constitution was written that our founding fathers didn't expect people to be able to easily buy high powered guns. I agree that if you allow people to carry it gives a chance for people to fight back against a mass shooting but it also causes other problems. If you have multiple people that shoot back at the active shooter then it creates a ton of confusion on who the actual active shooter is, especially for police. It also increases the chances of more innocent people getting shot. Granted there is no way to ensure that bad people can't get ahold of guns, but making it harder for them to buy them certainly doesn't do any harm. And allowing people to carry isn't going to deter any potential crazy person. The majority of these mass shooters either shoot themselves or get shot by cops, so they aren't gonna care if they get shot. Regardless where you stand on the issue I think everyone agrees hay SOMETHING needs to be done or changed otherwise we are going to continue having these mass shootings.