Comments by former_stripper (page 2)

SJG, I'm not on any form of assistance. It was sarcasm. The thing is welfare was originally for those who needed it and couldn't work Now though it has become a way of life which is why people protest it, It's lead to what we have today with higher crime and more babies born to unwed mothers. I'm sure if FDR knew what would happen he would have changed it a bit (though it didn't become a huge problem until LBJ and his war on poverty. Many of us have seen the programs abused and nope no excuse.

I don't even do this with monogamous partners so I don't get why people do it with strangers. That's just asking for trouble and disease.

Yes politically correct but that has nothing to do with abuse. I'm talking when there are classes with an agenda.

It can be the other way too as I know long term unemployed not on welfare. We need more education but at the early stages and instead of crap like PC classes, they need classes in math and English.

Not all long term unemployable are on welfare. Two different things and the group I am talking about never worked because they had welfare but keep crapping out more leeches. Long term unemployable are usually educated people who saw their decent jobs go overseas or replaced by machines or foreign workers.

I like the idea of people paying more in taxes and giving it to me! Why not, others do it. Meanwhile I can protest and talk about the man while I receive my EBT card. Sarcasm.

Huh? so people on welfare are using less money from the system than working people? That makes no sense because if they aren't working, they aren't paying taxes. My cousin doesn't care to do better, that side of my family don't care. He could work, he chooses not to. He's had good jobs but found a way to get fired because he does that with a payout in mind.

Get someone else.

Curvy used to mean a great body. Now it means fat. Women with large chests but nothing else but are just chesty not curvy anymore. Fat women took all the terms.

SJG, what do you mean that it's better to be on welfare than working a "worthless" job. First off, no job is worthless if it means tax dollars. I'm having a hard time understanding this logic that it's better to be a leech than work. This sounds like my worthless cousin who claims disability though he's not disabled. My aunt (also a class act)got her lawyer friend to claim that he was suicidal but the only time he's depressed is when he's out of cigarettes and booze. Meanwhile people who need disability get rejected because there isn't as much money because of bums like him. Please explain why it's a better idea to receive welfare than to work? I'm not talking those who need it talking those who take and a recent immigrant shouldn't take because they shouldn't be here if they can't support themselves. See, the more people on welfare, the more taxes go up because the money has to come from somewhere.

That's it, we deserve better. I want a moderate of either party but instead on the GOP side we have kooks and the Dems have Clinton who's a crook.

Well if someone is white and on welfare then they aren't privileged are they? I'm not on welfare and knew people who were but they were American, not immigrants.

Yes but there are more whites than anyone else. Here's an article that states more than half of all immigrants are on welfare. http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2015/09/01/immigrant-welfare-use-report/71517072/. Then there is this that states 90% of Muslim refugees are on welfare: https://refugeeresettlementwatch.wordpress.com/2015/09/11/senator-jeff-sessions-90-of-middle-eastern-refugees-get-some-form-of-welfare/. The only group I believe who doesn't use welfare that much are Indians (from India)but that makes sense.

Twentyfive, not sure how you know Quasimodo has a big dick so I have to assume either he fucked you or you are him. A big dick isn't the most important thing to most women. San Jose, that's exactly it. You never know how people are going to click when they meet, whether it's online or blind date. Personally I like friends first but some want that instant connection. Instant is best for sexual only relationships. The problem with online is the photo only tells part of the story.

Most of the time she is faking it. While there are times she may be attracted this is rare. Let's be honest, a top of the line stripper is (presumably)attractive, why would she be turned on to a fat, ugly, probably much older slob?Not likely. Okay a guy might be handsome and all of that but even so to most it's a job. So if you think she is turned on she is likely either a very good actress or less common you are special.

I don't like Trump but he's saying things people agree with, like illegal immigration and terrorism. Only he knows if he actually agrees or just saying it but it's setting off people. Especially since Obama is really going against what the American people really want. The fact is people are mad and tired of liars like Obama who promised one thing but did another. I was an Obama fan, I donated to his first campaign and wanted him to win, but ironic I was working for an opponent during his senate campaign primary. What helped him win that was that he ended up running against a nutjob no one wanted as a senator (Alan Keyes)and many high profile Republicans stated they were voting for him. That led to him running for senate and people thinking he was independent. He wasn't though. He proceeded to do many things that many didn't like, like sign TPP, Obamacare, pushing for amnesty, etc. I think we may seen candidates emerge we never thought would get the nomination. I don't think the Democrats are dumb enough to run Clinton because she has too many issues. Likewise with the Republicans and Trump.

"You'll get a lot of fugly girls messaging you." San Jose Guy, reverse that to fugly guys and you have my experience. I have seen all types of people but was stunned by the amount of fugly men out there. Quasimodo is not just a fictional character.

No, I didn't come from Russia. I do have recent immigration in my family but we just can't take everyone in. We don't have the jobs for Americans, let alone anyone else. We also can't keep throwing money at problems. Most importantly, we live in a world of terror and we can't let in people who might kill us.

Depends on what you seek. If you are seeking sex (and by honest about it)then you'll probably have success. If not or you are seeking a specific type of person you'll probably fail. I did most of them and outside of a few decent dates (and a few friends)I got nowhere. Waste of time for me.

Vincemichaels, back then we didn't get people coming here to abuse welfare or be terrorists. There's the difference.

Don't remember, probably a few thousand? I've heard one girl I danced with made $10,000 one night and another made $60,000 in a month (she used it for a house down payment)but they could have been lying.

Nope, never did this nor would I.

Some do, some don't. You can usually tell by things like how long they've been dancing and whether it looks like they make money. Many guys will give a backhanded compliment, like say you need another job, and then suggest low class menial job that is harder and means working more hours.

Yeah I have to wonder why Obama (and European leaders are pushing this and I have my theories). No we can't take everyone in nor should we. Is it coincidence that this all happens in the talk of stricter gun control? Reminds me a lot of what happened before WW2.

I have heard Backlash and that book had some great points and some not so great, but one of the ones that stood out for me was about the superwoman of the 80's and how you had these career women and all that they faced. It really was the first time that women were making the choice to be childfree or it was chosen for them. You probably remember the famous study about women after a certain age (I think it was 30 then)being more likely to be killed by a terrorist than get married. It was later proven that this as an exaggeration and that most of the women interviewed did in fact marry. Even today there are stats that have been proven false related to this yet keep getting pushed as fact. One interesting fact about marriage is that more children born to moms under 30 are born illegitimate. Some are career focused but others aren't. Meanwhile the marriage rate goes up and down. All of this falls into play because until quite recently women were told being wives and mothers should be their ultimate goal. Now with women having choices the dynamic has changed. It's changed too for men, some would argue good some bad. One thing that has happened is that women used to use pregnancy to trap a man (some men did it too)but now not always the case. These women tend to be those who often have nothing else going in their life so they want a baby and think it means getting a husband too. Tennessee Williams is fantastic and I've read his plays. Laura to me was a strong character though at first she appears weak. Same with Blance Dubois. I'll have to seek out both of those books.