discussion comment
4 years ago
Pubic hair coming back is literally the worst news I've heard in 2020
discussion comment
4 years ago
BTW, -me, there are many strippers and escorts on SA, and you'll pretty much know how to deal with them, if that's what youre looking for. All PLs speak escort and stripper language. It's the 22 year old college girl that has to be treated differently
discussion comment
4 years ago
No one who doesn't want to get ripped off, does allowance to start. PPM to start -- consider moving to allowance at a later date, if you want -- has become the standard. Just drop the 1% of SBs who refuse to deal with PPM, and keep yourself safe. Starting with allowance is like handing a stripper your $300 for the VIP room without negotiating anything.
discussion comment
4 years ago
25: I've been wondering if there's a practical floor here. By the time it's 175 per meet, will most hot girls just become waitresses or something else instead? It's just hard to imagine, with the typical 3-4+ hour dates, plus lots of texting in between, that's so common on SA, that $175 is still attractive. I can't imagine hitting those numbers in a more expensive area
Here where I am, more girls are starting to accept what used to be the practical low end (400), but not lower than that yet. But given that everything is sort-of frozen -- we can't actually meet so it's all theoretical -- I suspect it will dip lower
discussion comment
4 years ago
"So you guys think $300 per meet is too cheap?
$500 for a meet then"
-me, process-wise, you're caving pretty quickly here. If we don't know your exact location, no one telling you that $300 is too cheap, or not, really has any idea. Just believing them and almost doubling your price, based on guesses on the internet, is not the way to success here!
If by "southern CA" you mean LA or SD, then pre-covid-19, $400+ PPM (I don't know why you keep saying per-week??? Are you planning on offering an allowance structure where you give her the per-week allowance whether or not you see her? If so, I'd advise you that you're taking on a lot of risk for no reason. If not, then talk in PPM terms, not per week, or you'll set the wrong expectation in SBs' minds).
We don't know what will happen post covid19. We know allowances will definitely go down, probably pretty far down, but we don't know how far. I am skeptical that LA will get down to 300 PPM, but perhaps 350 might be reachable
discussion comment
4 years ago
Further thoughts:
"I'm really looking for a cute girl and am thinking to kick $200-300 to per week, meet them on avg once a week. "
If you're in NY or LV, looking for a 9, that's delusional. But in many areas, $300 PPM for a 7.5-8 is something you can definitely find... and will become even easier to find when the lockdowns end.
"I'd be going after a stripper right now, except well, I can't lol"
SA is more loaded with strippers than ever, so you're indirectly already going after strippers :) Although strippers, like everyone else, are avoiding meeting right now (at least most of them). Expect a lot of propositions of "let's start an online arrangement and then meet up when the lockdowns are over". I suggest not falling for that!
discussion comment
4 years ago
-me, there is no worse time to be on SA. Women have absolutely poured into the site, most of whom are just looking to get paid for online interactions; just desperate (understandably so) women from inside and outside the sex industry, trying to find some online $. Most of the actual SBs aren't interested in meeting in person. Which means that now, more than ever, you're looking for a needle in a haystack. If you wait a few weeks, I'll predict it will be amazing hunting, for the obvious reasons. But right now it's shit.
-me, in your first few messages, just mention you're looking for something mutually beneficial, and leave it at that. That's all that's needed, IME. But expect things to be frustrating the next few weeks.
discussion comment
4 years ago
Pubic hair coming back in style? Just when you thought 2020 couldn't get any worse
discussion comment
4 years ago
![]()
sawxfanncLooking out for Becca from Twin Peaks 🥰
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7Q_a4zY44_s
discussion comment
4 years ago
People aren't going to stop using abbreviations, but most abbreviations we use are in the glossary https://tuscl.net/glossary.php Any that aren't, just ask. You'll get fucked with but eventually someone will take pity on you and tell you what it really means :)
discussion comment
4 years ago
Jimmy, I appreciate a good snark :) lol ... but I think this is more of: we have ALWAYS hated the valet. We're hoping they'll stop it. Otherwise, You are definitely right, the valet is really not much of a health concern compared to the honeys. Even though in my case, my princess of a CF really does only do it with me; the sluts the rest of these guys go to, obviously different story.
discussion comment
4 years ago
I assume these clubs that do valet parking -- they would not do this if you had another option (street parking, park in the public garage two blocks down, etc). Is that right? I would do anything to avoid valet parking at a strip club, including walking a few blocks, or just taking an uber...although as I understand it, some of these clubs are far enough out in the sticks that even uber isn't an option.
discussion comment
4 years ago
You see? This is why we need to #OpenFlorida
Dave_Anderson, agree about CA strip clubs. Will be interesting to see whether SF clubs re-open and keep going
discussion comment
4 years ago
Uh, I'm pretty sure I know how to count, wallanon. Me and aleccorbett are five inches. Papi and "some of us on here" (by which he means, everyone else on here) are 1 inch.
discussion comment
4 years ago
Yeah, yeah, me too. I have a BBC that is in the top .05% size wise too
discussion comment
4 years ago
When I was younger, this was a "no fucking way" thing. These days, I think it'd be a kick, and as long as my face wasn't on camera, I would not just indulge, but actually kind of consider it a fun bucket list thing.
discussion comment
4 years ago
Bars and restaurants for me. My life outside the home is significantly built around those -- meet friends for drinks once every week or two, meet the SB for drinks and dinner, take my kids out to eat, etc.
discussion comment
4 years ago
![]()
shailynnThey never tell you what you need to know.
"So many variables. I gave the questions some thought and I just think it’s unknowable. Like skiing in a mogul field. React to each bump. "
Agree. And there's the big wildcard of treatment. While everyone is for some reason focused on a vaccine, which is over a year away at best, there are dozens of other treatments being tested, and any one of them can be shown to have merit any week now. As a rough guess, figure 3-5 months to scale up availability, and we could see everyone but the elderly and those with multiple comorbidities out and about by the fall.
discussion comment
4 years ago
![]()
rickduganVerified and Certifiable Super-Reviewer
BTW, it's not (completely) a joke -- I honestly want to see Florida open up. I could pass a lie detector on that.
discussion comment
4 years ago
![]()
rickduganVerified and Certifiable Super-Reviewer
I am #OpenFlorida and proud, man. No idea what your problem is. It's exactly the right thing to do.
discussion comment
4 years ago
![]()
rickduganVerified and Certifiable Super-Reviewer
I'm of the opinion that it's time for cautiously opening up, those areas that want to open up. I am a huge #OpenFlorida fan. Here in CA, Napa (with very few cases) is doing the same; SF and LA will be much, much further behind. We'll hope for the best. I'm not planning to go to Napa anytime soon, but it will be interesting to see what happens there as a zillion golfers throughout the state converge on Napa to shoot some club or whatever they call it
The economic implications are enormous -- which we knew would happen, and was a tradeoff we (certainly I) were willing to make. But anywhere the curve has been truly flattened and has low incidence, if they want to open up, let's see where it leads. I have a theory that it won't lead anywhere good, but this (not a month ago, based on delusions of cures happening in a week) is the time to take small gambles.
discussion comment
4 years ago
![]()
rickduganVerified and Certifiable Super-Reviewer
I demand you remove that bullshit post Papi. I am 1000% on the "open Florida" bandwagon.
discussion comment
4 years ago
BTW, doc, I don't want to go off on a tangent, but I can't find any source that doesn't rate Sweden's healthcare from good to world-class. But the state of Sweden's healthcare is not something I have a stake in either way
discussion comment
4 years ago
"There will be trade-offs no matter what course is taken. That is an inarguable fact. Mistakes have been and will be made. No way around that"
Agree completely. The mistakes that were done are done
"That said the point that you are trying to make, that Sweden is not the USA and what works in Sweden won’t necessarily work in the USA, is completely valid. Now I suggest that the same logic needs to be applied within the USA. Rapid City South Dakota is not New York City and Needles California is not San Francisco California. "
I think now -- not a month+ ago when it was recklessly being floated -- is the right time to cautiously go about that. And, that's what's happening, after all. I'm fine -- hell, THRILLED -- Florida is going first. You won't hear me complain about that.
discussion comment
4 years ago
"Despite pockets of attention-grabbing protests, a new survey finds Americans remain overwhelmingly in favor of stay-at-home orders and other efforts to slow the spread of the coronavirus.
The survey from The Associated Press-NORC Center for Public Affairs Research finds that more than a month after schoolyards fell silent, restaurant tables and bar stools emptied, and waves from a safe distance replaced hugs and handshakes, the country largely believes restrictions on social interaction to curb the spread of the virus are appropriate.
Only 12% of Americans say the measures where they live go too far. About twice as many people, 26%, believe the limits don’t go far enough. The majority of Americans — 61% — feel the steps taken by government officials to prevent infections of COVID-19 in their area are about right."
Anyway, popular sentiment isn't indicative of the right thing to do -- majorities are often wrong. Just wanted to correct the mis-impression that vast hordes of Americans are ready to rebel, despite over-emphasis by the press of small vocal pockets.
BTW, I'm among those who think we have to start opening things up judiciously... we've squandered the time we bought, but can't wait much longer, the effect on the economy has been horrific. I am happy that the states leading the way are not my state.