Comments by IronFox22 (page 4)

And while Mila Kunis is hot, I don't think she's the hottest girl in the world as some guys do. In fact, I was just watching Forgetting Sarah Marshall, and I think I prefer Kristin Bell to Mila Kunis.

I agree with Julia Roberts and Jennifer Aniston (I always thought Courtney Cox was much prettier). I'd throw in Angelina Jolie, too

I don't have a hotel just yet. I've never been to Detroit before, so staying near the airport is the default option. I'm assuming that the 8 Mile area, while offering plenty of excellent high-mileage opportunities, is not a very nice place to stay overnight.

touche

This might be too much information, but I always loved the MILFs who are a bit older (perhaps even in their 40s) who've got the freckles in the cleavage area. Always did something for me.

You guys are probably right about the percentage being not that high. I just got to thinking about how I used to work in a large office with probably 100 people or so, most of them men. I always had it in my brain, for some odd reason, that *none* of these men went to strip clubs. I thought of them all as completely straight-laced family men. This was likely not the case, but my default position is to assume people don't go.

I've moving to one of the old rust belt towns near western Pennsylvania / northern West Virginia.

On the other hand, we've all gotten those dancers from time to time who seem to hit the little guy the exact wrong way. It becomes painful, but you don't really want to hurt their feelings so you just put up with until the song is over. Also, when she backs away from you for a split second to get ready for a different move, you can adjust the little guy lightning quick so that he can better handle the pressure.

The problem is--once you've been in the club for a few hours--you get so used to the smell that you can no longer determine if you've gotten rid of the perfume odor before you get home. There's a limited amount of guess work. You basically do everything you can (and hope you've done enough).

I think you're right motorhead. The bony girls are actually somewhat painful some times. Curvier girls are great, and I actually usually prefer them.

I got glitter on my face once and was pissed. This seems like the ultimate stupidity. In a business where many of the patrons would like to be discreet, I can't imagine why a dancer would want to load up on glitter. Guys hate it.

I rather like dry handjobs

Ok. I probably used the wrong word. Just overly rigorous. There's a long list of things you have to be sure to include. There are 10 very specific points, and one of them reads like this: "7.In order to keep our performance ratings consistent, we set up the following system: An escort provider is only eligible to earn up to a 7, unless she is willing to perform one or some of the following during a session: Kisses With Tongue, Bare-Back Blow Job, Really Bi, and Anal Sex, or More than One Guy. For each of these services that are offered, her potential max score is raised by one point, with 10 as an absolute maximum. This does not mean she earns extra points for offering the service(s); just that she is now eligible for a higher score. Her maximum eligible score is based on what is offered, not what is performed during your session with her. You may or may not be interested in the “extra” services she offers, but the fact she offers them makes her eligible for the higher score. If your review rates a provider higher than her maximum score, the score will be adjusted down to her maximum."

I've seen a few girls over the past few months and am thinking of writing two reviews (which would give me VIP membership- much the same as it does here). The rules for writing the reviews seem pretty rigorous, however, and the site indicates that they will check all the details of your views to ensure you're not lying and will reject reviews that look suspicious. Well, WTF? Seems a little Nazi-ish. I'm hoping that this is just a bit of bluster, and that the reviews go through with no problem.

Good call, Club_Goer. The little guy was making me stupid. I shall not go.

give me Dominic Moceanu

I'm doing well enough, I think. I try to always be respectful, find myself decently funny (in the Colbert/Conan quirky way), and like to read. So those are a few good things. I think kindness and respect, by the way, can bridge a whole lot of gaps when it comes to women.

Christianity- The belief that a cosmic Jewish zombie who was his own father can make you live forever if you symbolically eat his flesh and telepathically tell him you accept him as your master, so he can remove an evil force from your soul that is present in humanity because a rib-woman was convinced by a talking snake to eat from a magical tree... I really don't see the problem.

My problem is that I compare myself to the way I looked when I was younger, and obviously I look worse. I have to really remind myself that no one else knows what I looked like when I was younger so they are taking me as I am now. Hard to remember that sometimes, though.

I'm shocked to find that there are people on a strip club message board who consider gay people "deviant." I thought for sure a message board such as this would be full of knowledgeable, free-thinking, well-read, open-minded, tolerant, intellectually sophisticated men. Who would of thought? Next, some of you guys are going to tell me that you believe a 2,000-year-old god is coming back to save you.

Sexual orientation not preference ("preference" indicates that there is a choice in the matter)

“… I don't understand why gay people find the need to announce their personal lifestyle ...” Because, in general, it feels shitty to have to hide part of who you are.

I understand where TiredTravel and others are coming from. No one wants to carry a heavier tax burden. But there are a lot of great things about the planet that I don't want to see go away. Tiredtraveler, Doctor Phil, and Mikey, I'd still by you a drink at the club if I had a chance. No hard feelings. Have a good Christmas.

Doctor Phil, Did you look at the byline on that article you posted? It's by James Taylor, who works for the Heartland Institute. The organization's whole purpose is to combat environmental legislation. *Of course* they are going to write articles like this. They are akin to the Discovery Institute, which produces similar articles claiming that evolution did not happen. The Heartland Institute is also the organization that tried to show in the 1990s that secondhand smoke was in no way harmful to bystanders. As an side, you can visit the NASA site and view the organizations that have released public statements indicating that global warming is indeed happening. These include: American Association for the Advancement of Science American Chemical Society American Geophysical Union American Medical Association American Meteorological Society American Physical Society The Geological Society of America *Similar organizations from every developed country around the world. See them here: http://climate.nasa.gov/scientific-consensus

Who says I sacrifice myself on the altar of Al Gore? I'm interested in what the climate scientists have to say. Again, NASA has excellent information on it. Al Gore doesn't control NASA. Tell me what you think. climate.nasa.gov/evidence