discussion comment
11 years ago
Ah, Mikey, that's a site that is trying to explain to people (in an easily understandable way). I can see your point, though.
Try NASA's instead. I presume that you don't think NASA is a joke.
http://climate.nasa.gov/evidence
discussion comment
11 years ago
All the information you'll ever need is in the link below. The site contains explanations for all of the myths commonly espoused by people who don't believe in global warming.
http://www.skepticalscience.com/global-warming-on-mars.htm
That site also explains the top 10 myths that are often used by people to claim that there is no global warming. Among these myths are:
1) The climate's changed before
2) It's the sun
3) It's not that bad
4) There is no consensus
5) Our climate models are unreliable
6) Antarctica has gained ice
All of these have been thoroughly debunked. They are called "wedge arguments," which are injected into the debate in an attempt to deliberately muddy things so that no action can be taken. Same thing happens with intelligent design.
The best cure for all of this, of course, is knowledge. Please read up on the findings, Mikey. We could use your help in combating climate change.
discussion comment
11 years ago
So what? I'm not sure that's the case, but feel free to back up your statement with a peer-reviewed article. Even if the temperature has risen on Mars recently, why would that have any bearing on Earth's situation?
Climate scientists who have spent their whole lives combing through data and devising rigorous experiments that show that the Earth is warming, and that the warming trend is very closely associated with carbon dioxide emission from humans. As you are not a science yourself (I assume), why do you think you know better than the experts? Presumably, you wouldn't say this about medical specialists, chemists, physicists, or biologists. What do non-scientists believe that they're somehow more knowledgeable than scientists? Who knows.
discussion comment
11 years ago
No legitimate scientist has ever predicted the end of the world because of magnetic pole flipping or the Mayan calendar. The coming Ice Age, which want not put forth by any reputable scientific organization, came to prominence in the 1970s when it was touted by a few less-than-honest publications. Likewise with the avian flu pandemic.
Individuals who are on the front lines of climate science all agree that the Earth is warming. The problem with the deniers is that they tend to only hear what they wish to be true.
discussion comment
11 years ago
Mikey--
You may not make random statements without reputable sources to prove your point. Scientists are merely interested in what is true. If the data points to the Earth warming, then that's what the data shows.
This happens with the anti-evolution crowd all the time. They find something on the Internet and then somehow believe that they have the key to overthrowing all of paleontology/biology/genetics.
discussion comment
11 years ago
I have to chime in here as well. The evidence for human-induced climate change is overwhelming and fairly well undeniable. There simply isn't any controversy among scientists who study the evidence.
Why do people without climate science degrees (lawyers, businessmen, economists, etc) think that they know more than the climate scientists themselves? It's the same with evolution. Non-scientists without any background in the appropriate field simply taking over the discussion.
discussion comment
11 years ago
Jester and Zip and a few of the others are right. If the guy had been arrested, punished, or otherwise subjected to a malevolent government act of some sort, that would certainly be a violation of his right to free speech. This is not what is happening here.
discussion comment
11 years ago
So you would recommend protection for giving oral to a woman, lopaw?
discussion comment
11 years ago
I don't mind if they're overweight. And if they're screwing with me, I don't lose anything but a bit of my time. The "dude" thing is the only thing that scares me. Still, there may be some promise here.
discussion comment
11 years ago
All right, I'll come back in here, as I started this. I mean, yeah, that as she's grinding on you put your hands together. It would lean toward a GFE-type experience. Some people like it. Some don't.
As an alternative, if they are facing away from you and leaning down a bit, you can gold her hands by the wrists; this way, you can control the grind speed. Most girls prolly don't like this, but I've gotten to do it once or twice.
discussion comment
11 years ago
I was at Bandaids yesterday and the dances are still $10 and decently high mileage. I'm aware that the Hiliter and Bandaids are both owned by the same people. So am crossing my fingers that the dances remain $10.
discussion comment
11 years ago
That's interesting. I didn't know about the unescorted female thing. What if you're a legitimate female customer who maybe likes to watch the ladies? Could they really block you from entering? That seems illegal somehow.
discussion comment
11 years ago
![]()
motorheadFat, drunk and stupid is no way to go through life
Racism, anyone?
discussion comment
11 years ago
![]()
motorheadFat, drunk and stupid is no way to go through life
I don't get it. Is she in the hotel business?
discussion comment
11 years ago
Damn. For some reason, I never considered the fact that she might be waiting for a sign to go further. I guess fortune does indeed favor the bold.
discussion comment
11 years ago
Probably not on Commando. Never done that (not saying that I wouldn't in the future). Perhaps its a slight bit of paranoia. I'd feel like the girls would be talking about me in the back.
discussion comment
11 years ago
Not really useless; just funny. Someone posts semi-anonymous dancer names in my area but it's obvious what the girls' names are.
"Got a dance from B*tt*r*ly in VIP and it was great."
Dude, I can obviously tell that her name is Butterfly.
discussion comment
11 years ago
3leggedman--
Those are excellent prices for VIP. Hell, even if you're getting only adequate dances, that's still fantastic.
discussion comment
11 years ago
Sounds about right. You'd certainly have to try the dancers out on the floor, and then maybe the best ones you might consider going to VIP with.
sharkhunter, damn, $5000? I'd be scared to hell of possibly being mugged, etc.
discussion comment
11 years ago
Actually, it's $120. My bad. Well, if you figure traditional dances are about 3 minutes, that would work out to 5 dances in 15 minutes. That's about $24 a dance. Seems about right. A little more expensive because the little area is away from everything else.
$120 includes everything.
review comment
9 years ago
Spot-on Review