discussion comment
11 years ago
Not $69,969.69?
That would have helped more... And gotten you 69 from a HAWT bell ringer!
discussion comment
11 years ago
C'mon .Alucard (note the dot...). Can't we all get along during the holiday season?
If you're gonna troll -- just for the holidays -- make it light hearted and not mean spirited... Maybe edit the "get fucked and die" stuff. Peace my man!!!
discussion comment
11 years ago
![]()
motorheadFat, drunk and stupid is no way to go through life
LDK should totally change his avatar to a pic of Santa with jizz stains on his pants.
Peace ;-)
discussion comment
11 years ago
![]()
ilbbaicnlKeep it in my pants when I do OTC. If I were a stripper it would stand for I like big bucks and I can not lie.
(and merry post-Xmas to our bud ilbbaicnl)
discussion comment
11 years ago
![]()
ilbbaicnlKeep it in my pants when I do OTC. If I were a stripper it would stand for I like big bucks and I can not lie.
Once again, for posterity, I shall write what Juice would have written if he wanted to communicate the same thoughts as ilbbaicnl:
Eye thank dat a beyotch don nevar gets al lubbed up fo no dude wit no inkk mi bros. whut u thank????
discussion comment
11 years ago
No strippers. Jes' some family time... Nice crab & lobster dinner.
discussion comment
11 years ago
Smells like swag waka flocka flame!!!!
Eye gots da waka flocka bangorrhea totes mcgotes!!!!
discussion comment
11 years ago
But joker my man...you never answered the blumpkin question. D'ya wear this shirt?
www.strangecargo.com/its-blumpkin-time-shirt
discussion comment
11 years ago
Of course, Mrs. Claus may be older but Santa *always* went for chicks with rockin' tits:
www.karups.com/older-women/maggie-green-santas-little-helper/
discussion comment
11 years ago
Oops...
www.pinkfineart.com/twistys-models/mia-malkova-santas-helper/77220/
discussion comment
11 years ago
Of course, we've previously seen questionable butt plug use in FloriDUH...
2 rear ends at the same time.
https://www.tuscl.net/postread.php?PID=18247
Excuse me if I'd rather imagine Jennifer Lawrence using her butt plus than think 'bout the dude in those pictures with a butt plug.
discussion comment
11 years ago
Clubber my man, even if mainstream actors did have sex you would have to memorize more lines.
With porn your lines are mostly "here's your pizza ma'am...I made sure there was extra sausage...wanna see?"
discussion comment
11 years ago
![]()
motorheadFat, drunk and stupid is no way to go through life
Motorhead my man, you could have said "maybe if you take your top off I would stop masturbating sooner".
discussion comment
11 years ago
Many strippers have the sense not to rub ol' Aunt Flo all over your pants. So don't give up!
discussion comment
11 years ago
I sill find it a thrill SnackBox my man...ev'ry morning I get up and say to myself "who am I gonna flash today?"
discussion comment
11 years ago
And then ther is a politician I could vote for...Amy (Jugs) Biviano:
http://fritz-aviewfromthebeach.blogspot.com/2012/10/washington-state-candidate-revealed-as.html
Check out the NSFW link. Bet the chick still has nice jugs cos they were spectacular back in the day. FUCK YEAH!!!
discussion comment
11 years ago
Fuck yeah Slick!
I love some of the old school playboys. Especially the college girl pictorials:
http://www.majorwager.com/forums/mw-entertainment-forum/189075-playboy-coed-conference-collection.html
discussion comment
11 years ago
^^^^
She probably didn't love his wallet as much as she loved yours.
discussion comment
11 years ago
Mr. Shark is right that climate engineering has been proposed. Somebody will need to pay for the engineering though. But if it is cheaper than reducing emissions I'm all for it.
Reality is though that there are reasons to reduce emissions other than greenhouse gasses. Why are we (mostly America) in the Middle East? Is it because we love the countries so much? At the end of the day we're there because middle eastern oil is there. We're spending huge amounts of money (money that there we're not taxing to offset the spending) and we're spending blood.
If there was high risk associated with middle eastern oil prices will rise. They'll rise worldwide because of scarcity, regardless of production elsewhere. But propping up Mideast dictatorships also costs money. It is just hidden. And much of it is on credit. If the Chinese want to keep prices low let them try to prop up the middle eastern dictators (they don't have the logistical capabilities to do it and I suspect they'll invest in green energy before they pay to build the capability of running a Mideast war -- probably cheaper).
And remember -- Al Gore isn't dictator of climate change responses. He's a politician that latched onto global warming. He currently holds no office. He is really irrelevant.
discussion comment
11 years ago
Motorhead with webbed hands and feet. I think I'm tripping on acid but don't remember taking any.
IronFox22 is right about these wedge arguments. That why I focus on the core. CO2 is a greenhouse gas. That is rock solid you can measure the infrared spectrum stuff. Not beyond basic college chem. CO2 is accumulating. Again rock solid. Easy to measure. Even if you don't believe most scientists you've got to know at least some could be hired to show that CO2 isn't rising. They can't, which is why the anti-AGW crowd makes up BS arguments.
Once you get past the rock solid you get into the tricky game of projecting future patterns of CO2 and other greenhouse gas accumulation. You get into feedbacks (CO2 stimulates growth ameliorating CO2 emissions, but warming releases arctic carbon when permafrost melts and exacerbates). That is difficult, but it is possible to say "we run models and can see best-case, worst-case, and middle of the road scenarios". Even under the best case we're in for faster warming than during earlier warm periods.
discussion comment
11 years ago
@Slick -- the problem with alternative perspectives on global warming is that they fail on first principles. There is a core there that can't be refuted. Greenhouse gasses are accumulating. Unless something balances that accumulation they HAVE to cause warming. Arrhenius showed how much warming there has to be under simplistic conditions in the late 19th century and nobody has changed the fundamentals of the equation since then. The 20th-21st century models all attempt to integrate feedbacks, etc. That is difficult. But the core is there and is really solid. To deny it denies a LOT of science.
I've never seen an AGW denier actually put forward a simple answer to the fundamental issue. They always nitpick about minutia. If an AGW denier could say "yes, greenhouse gasses are accumulating snd that would be expected to raise temperatures, but here is what is compensating for their accumulation" I'd take that statement seriously.
An ice-free Antarctica in historical times is a non-starter. There is huge amounts of water in the ice sheet. Shorelines would have been fundamentally different. That ice has been there for millions of years.
discussion comment
11 years ago
I try to mix it up with humans, Klingons, Vulcans, and Andorians. No better cure for blue balls than a hot Andorian chick!
discussion comment
11 years ago
@slick -- Arctic ice is shrinking, not Antarctic (more accurately the Antarctic is mixed). All of this makes reasonable sense in light of the best available climate models, though, as with everything in science, there is a lot of complexity.
discussion comment
11 years ago
@deogol -- I honestly don't understand what you're saying. All the individual words are standard English but their strung together in a way that doesn't appear to make sense, even if taken on its own terms.
Are you trying to say that global warming hasn't occurred over the past 17 years? Even AGW deniers admit that the temperature anomaly exists. They just attribute it to natural processes. Or are you claiming global warming will reverse in the next 17 years? If so, why?
As usual, reality is very complex and the degree of temperature increase exhibits variation. Doing the actual science is hard. But you seem to be falling down even on fundamentals.
discussion comment
11 years ago
Shark my man...I likes the landing strips more than the full on biebers.