On the subject of tying dancers to extras, especially in Seattle
drewcareypnw
not the real drew carey, but I play him at strip clubs...
I took the day off doing some of my favorite things: record shopping, comic book shopping, eating, and whoring. I stopped into a local club, enjoyed a delightful and energetic VIP session, and left more than happy. I'm leaving this vague for reasons I will reveal shortly.
Afterwards, I stopped to chat for a few minutes with this friendly and charming little dynamo. She asked me "are you on any of those sites?" I said that I was on stripper related sites, but did not specify which. She then specifically asked that I not describe any aspect of our VIP or mention her name directly or any other way. I said "ok sure" and asked why.
She said that she picks who she does what with based on her initial estimation of them and a vibe. She doesn't do the same things or even anything with everyone who asks, and doesn't want B showing up asking for what A got. Even though she understands that we want to know what we are getting, who is good or bad, etc.
...so there it is from the horse's mouth. At least this dancer doesn't want us tying names to extras, or anything else for that matter.
This falls under #2 what I think of the 3 typically given reasons not to share names:
1. Pimp may beat up dancer based on the review.
2. Dancer doesn't want B showing up asking for what A got.
3. LE may shut down the dancer or club.
For me, the best reason to not connect a dancer to extras is because I think that probably she doesn't want me to. The dancer I met today is an unambiguous example of this. In general I personally don't do this, rather I make up funny names if I am describing an trip to the club. In this case, I won't even do that.
I should say that I still firmly believe ROBs get what they deserve and get named. Obviously this was in no way a ROB, it was a great time with a great girl.
FWIW Seattle brothers
-DC
Afterwards, I stopped to chat for a few minutes with this friendly and charming little dynamo. She asked me "are you on any of those sites?" I said that I was on stripper related sites, but did not specify which. She then specifically asked that I not describe any aspect of our VIP or mention her name directly or any other way. I said "ok sure" and asked why.
She said that she picks who she does what with based on her initial estimation of them and a vibe. She doesn't do the same things or even anything with everyone who asks, and doesn't want B showing up asking for what A got. Even though she understands that we want to know what we are getting, who is good or bad, etc.
...so there it is from the horse's mouth. At least this dancer doesn't want us tying names to extras, or anything else for that matter.
This falls under #2 what I think of the 3 typically given reasons not to share names:
1. Pimp may beat up dancer based on the review.
2. Dancer doesn't want B showing up asking for what A got.
3. LE may shut down the dancer or club.
For me, the best reason to not connect a dancer to extras is because I think that probably she doesn't want me to. The dancer I met today is an unambiguous example of this. In general I personally don't do this, rather I make up funny names if I am describing an trip to the club. In this case, I won't even do that.
I should say that I still firmly believe ROBs get what they deserve and get named. Obviously this was in no way a ROB, it was a great time with a great girl.
FWIW Seattle brothers
-DC
40 comments
Oh, and the topic of strip club fan websites has never come up with any dancer. I would deny everything.
Uhm, this was him three weeks ago:
"Another newsflash: the dancers also know all about TUSCL. They are not dumb. TUSCL is not a secret. They are workers in a trade and read reviews written by their customers. Write a *bad* review and they'll come on here and argue from time to time. They never come here and say "don't tell people that Stormy gave a blowie in the VIP!" This is because they too DGAF. And maybe also because Stormy DID give a blowie in the VIP."
I'm glad one of the dancers set things straight.
They Want A Consistant, Peaceful & $Cashing Clientele.
Things Should Be Hush Hush & You Don't Know If Things Will Get Blown Out Of Proportion From Customer Ta' Customer, Pimps Or Da' Club/City/Cops.
Dancers Vibes Can Be Different With Everybody, Mood Changes, Timeing Factors, & Da' $Cash.
Remember, $Negotiations Isn't Always Da' Same For All Clientele & There Are Factors Involved Of The Individually.
So, Hearing What A Got & What B Didn't Is Irrelevant & Stirs Rumors, Myths & Conflicting Chaos.
🤑 Good Discussion Drew!
And when a dancer asks me about SC review sites, i say "Hmmm. Never heard of that"
Anyway I'm not for naming dancers unless they're thieves/robs/trouble etc. Other than that they should have the courtesy to as much under the radar privacy that working in a strip club affords.
Name the girl, or name the act. Not both.
I'll also ding reviews that try to be clever about concealing the name. M*rc*d*s sang me Billy Joel for 200 roses. Do you think we're all retarded?
Its common sense not to expose someone for doing illicit work. Especially on a site with predatory weirdos
So where are you getting all this from? Or is your MO just calling everyone you don’t like a rapist?
To me the op was one Seattle guy talking to the others who decided to do it on the open board instead of a group chat. When I first saw the thread I said what I had to say in a pm, but what's the gain in piling on when minnow already said the op isn't one of the dudes putting names out there?
I can’t read what icey says bc he’s retarded and I put my retard filter on. I’m sure it’s illuminating.
People can pile on. Part of the allure of tuscl is shitting on people that you don’t know but don’t like. Like gamma, another retard I enjoy baiting and ignoring through the mute feature.
I shared my view knowing that some would chime in negatively or positively, and that a very few (the actual PLs of Seattle) would read it and think about what I said, not as some demand but as a data point they can use or discard as they so choose.
I think a lot of the “don’t share” arguments are bs, but do feel that if someone asks you not to, it’s the kind thing to do. These women do a wonderful and grand thing for us, and we should be nice to them.
The fact that none of the Seattle review mafia has responded to this thread is illuminating.
How Bout' Some Hot WA Girls Hikeing In Da' Mountains!
@ Wonderful Website, Scroll Down & Zig Zag Your Way Around For Lots Of Good Stuff. STATE OF WA CHEERS!
https://jesswandering.com/
I always write my reviews assuming the dancer will be reading it.
🎶 Cum on Eileen, Oh Cum on Eileen, Let’s take off everything 🎶
Theres positives and negatives to a dancer who is fine with or prefers being openly outed as an extra’s girl. The positives are she probably doesnt have a boyfriend pimp, and shes willing to provide service to almost anybody who pays and has proper hygiene. The negatives are she is more like an escort and more into the business aspect of things, just wants as many customers as possible.
WA Is # 1 State For Sasquatch Sightings Reporting, & I Luv It, Coz I Heard Just About Every Sasquatch Story On Earth!
I Can Just Imagine Being A Hiker Up In WA, & Coming Across Sasquatch On The Trail! The Sasquatch Is So Unpredictable, But We Love! Fun Lil' Extra & I Wonder If Any Strippers Has Seen Any Sasquatch? Sasquatch Data Base Website Link :
https://bfro.net/GDB/#usa
One thing that would be helpful to this end would be to add language in the review guidelines, which currently don't mention not connecting dancers to extras. But I believe the only way to truly solve this problem would be to add the capability to report published reviews. Reviewers will approve anything these days.
And @kallara, how do you know you haven't been reviewed here, by poster who didn't mention your dancer name, or used a pseudonym.
TFP & skibum +1