Is it time to call it a day?
Player11
Texas
Covid has increased risks of the SC / Monger Hobby. It already has risks of std (incl HIV), sex addiction (financial ruin), child support (getting one pg) which mean game over. Not mentioning losing your family.
I don’t miss all that (risk) but I do miss getting a few lap dances, good buffet, a good drink, entertainment. Have you suffered job loss, questions from wife where money went? Take a hard look and design your future path. That 15 -20 min sex romp in vip with that sexy 20 yo girl you paid $400 for do a gut check see if worth it. The rest of your life is on the line.
I don’t miss all that (risk) but I do miss getting a few lap dances, good buffet, a good drink, entertainment. Have you suffered job loss, questions from wife where money went? Take a hard look and design your future path. That 15 -20 min sex romp in vip with that sexy 20 yo girl you paid $400 for do a gut check see if worth it. The rest of your life is on the line.
Got something to say?
Start your own discussion
50 comments
Follow DesertScrub's rules and let the good times roll.
The effects of covid19, and only those, are what would make me stop SCing. I probably won't re-start SCing until I'm feeling super comfortable, it will be one of the last things I re-engage in. If everyone thinks like me, that in itself could really hurt the industry. In the meantime, I've found a substitute for now in SA, where I'll engage sooner than with SCs
Or just don't have sex with strippers at all, but I get it. Where's the fun in that?
As soon as the doors open I will be one the first PL's back in the club.
I will try to spend much less in the club, and whoring in general.
Pretty stunning reality check occurring.
Sorry player, but that sounds like a YOU issue. I'm guessing that you were struggling with fear an regret long before this COVID 19 thing and that this was just the straw that broke the camel's back. Maybe WILLYISAWOMAN can recommend his therapist to you since she already has ample experience listening to whining about guilt and conflicting urges thanks to him. She is also on Zoom now from what I understand.
Good luck!
Right. And all of those were issues before covid19, and it was something we all knew about and were managing. Player11, the whole notion that we need to rethink these things is super questionable. What isn't questionable is, each person needs to think carefully about the new variable -- covid19
Yeah it looks that way to me also.
My guess is that in left-wing areas, many others think like you. At least until the news channels let up on this issue. In right-wing areas, it will take less time for clubs to have foot traffic.
I am currently in a left-wing area, so I hope I am wrong.
This is the most TUSCL thing I've read here in a while.
1. Don’t do them bare back.
2. Stay on budget.
3. Find one good otc girl. Better do one good one than rotate multiple (increases risk across the board too).
4. Don’t discuss SC hobby w non hobbyists.
5. It’s ok tip, but watch out if they trying get u pay for stuff where services not rendered. Sucker shopping trips, needing big money upfront.
6. Decide what mode operation works best. If bf or husband knows about you - run bc at some point will mess things up.
8. Doing them otc / itc is like spinning a roulette wheel of risk. The risk may be next to nothin but it’s there. Evaluate what your putting on the line. You never which ones may be diseased. Google pct hookers hiv in your area. You lose on that roulette wheel y good as dead.
Right 25. Imagine these foolish politicians trying setting public policy without getting clearance from the medical establishment, as if anything else matters. These politicians need to make damned clear to their economic and mental health advisors that they don't want to hear any more blathering about economic devastation or increases in social ills ranging from domestic violence to suicides.
Heck, in the future, maybe we pass a Constitutional Amendment requiring the Commander-in-Chief to have a medical degree. Or perhaps we require all major public policy decisions to be cleared by the AMA. I am open to suggestions.
Right 25. Because economists and mental health experts aren't "qualified" to weigh in on public policy. Got it. Keep sharing that deep wisdom with us sir, that's good stuff. Really. 😉
Troll boy when have I ever said anything resembling that, you really are stupid you really are a fool SMH
The ultimate problem is that there is nothing about these decisions that is not political and that includes the "opinions" of various medical professionals and scientists. It is becoming increasingly clear that there are significant opposing view about basic issues such as mortality rates, the prevalence of infections, the impact of warmer weather, what activities are safe, etc., etc. It is also clear that some of these differences are a result of predispositions and other biases. It also isn't helping that the media is politicizing whichever medical opinions suit their own biases and then weaponizing them.
At some point laymen, including state Governors, have to process all the data, including the divergent medical opinions, but also economic and sociological data, and make what they believe to be the best decisions for the greatest number of their state residents. This too includes political calculations.
We all see that it’s obvious
===> "@nicespice that’s the real problem here everyone is politicizing this including the politicians, this is a job for medical folks and science professionals not something that any of these laymen or hobbyist experts should be calling, the problem here is the folks on both sides don’t take medical advice if it conflicts with their philosophy."
Unless you're just trolling for an excuse the post goofy insults...yet again.
Evaluating risk is what all living animals do - all the time - regarding their next moves.
Deciding that lap dances, etc, are too risky right now and may be for some time seems a fairly reasonable response. Some will disagree and decide otherwise.
No problem. Just as nobody here would call out another grown man's choices on how to spend his money, I'm sure no one will think you less manly for evaluating risk differently than you do.
Cause we're all adults here.
C Ya
In many cases - the more you have to lose - the more risk there is. If you can’t deal with the loss, this is not a good hobby for you.
Or of having kids since the $500 per child is not subjected to the income test. Thank you Congress and Mr. President for keeping me stimulated during a few OTC sessions on taxpayers' dime. 😉
But obviously you didn't know about the child piece because you haven't pro-created. Sounds like natural selection in action, lol.