Is it possible........
skibum609
Massachusetts
...that the Democratic party will actually find a worse candidate that Hillary and lose to the moron Trump again? You wouldthink it impossible, but John Kerry and Hillary Clinton make it possible....... Why don't they nominate Steny Hoyer and try to pretend they're Americans?
145 comments
https://www.nydailynews.com/news/politic…
I think I have a preference for Warren -- but I would vote for Biden as a safer way to get rid of the idiot in office. This is no time for a risky candidate.
why not? they're both still alive. only pair left around who haven't had a second term.
so, give it to 'em. give 'em a second shot, since folks like to criticize their past administration in the 70s
hell, carter & or mondale may even be both talked into not taking a salary this time around.
i'd vote for 'em--if they were running together, regardless
But I think Trump will have less supporters than in 2016 bc of the many shenanigans he's pulled as president - but the strong economy may make many voters gun-shy about electing a big-government democrat to fuck it up.
Hillary Clinton was a very centrist candidate.
Elizabeth Warren really is too, but with Right Wing Media, the center is really now in right wing nonsense land.
SJG
Right Wing nonsense media though has been poisoning the electorate for decades now. It is nonstop, and it has no relation to reality.
SJG
I’d say Left Wing nonsense media has been doing the same thing, only in the other direction. Neither one of them pays much attention to the truth from what I’ve seen.
Right wing nonsense is the main thing on the internet. Other than that the most extreme thing is Fox
Remember that I come from back when there was just the official news, before the internet and before Cable TV.
It was just network, really 3 of them.
SJG
We nominate Biden on "electability" and he pulls a Kerry and loses. I would argue most of Bidens issues don't matter as much vs Trump such as "old" "slightly creepy with women" and "a bit of a loose cannon". All three of those apply as much or more to Trump.
Fear two is we nominate a progressive who polls well but loses. Warren seems to have all the markings of a candidate whose actual votes won't match her polling.
Obviously this President had been a huge failure, and I pray he will be the worst president we see in our lifetimes. He's ruined our international reputation and hurt our economy with trade wars. Putin is getting exactly what he wanted with an incompetent President. I really hope the Republicans find someone better than Cruz or Rubio going forward.
There could be a black swan event that changes the election but, barring that, the odds are in Trump's favor.
Record unemployment and a record stock market I don't see as a huge failure.
And standing up to China and their corruption, and standing up to European countries that for decades took advantage of the US by not contributing to NATO as was agreed; finally standing up to them is a good thing - China and many European countries had been taking advantage of the US for decades and no one stood uo to them I guess in the name of "international relations".
I would like Trump to go about it a different way but IMO many of the things he's doing are for the betterment of the US in the long-run l, and change is often painful.
4 progressive congress women standing up for themselves:
https://www.democracynow.org/2019/7/16/t…
SJG
SJG
But Warren and Jay Inslee and many of the others look very good!
SJG
I think the DNC will force Biden on voters just as it did Clinton. In which case, Trump could get a second term thanks to abstentionism....
The unemployment rate and the stock market are irrelevant, just part of a boom and bust cycle which is very destructive.
SJG
It is really our economic system which is screwy, and dropping the top tax rate will only make it more so, deeper booms and busts
SJG
Yes, Democrats like to crow about it, and this is stupid.
What we need is an altered economic system, mostly we need to go back to pre-Reagan taxation levels, top rate 70%.
Clinton did
1. apply the extra 2% tax
2. Make small cuts to military spending
This was enough to really please the financial community. Said that he was not racing to drive the train off of a cliff.
It meant Price to Earnings ratios could be higher, because lower interest rates and a longer term view of corporate valuations.
Wish Clinton could have done more and his changes lasted. Wish he could have gotten his health care passed.
SJG
This was that first budget, where they had a state of the union and Hillary sat between John Scully and Alan Greenspan, it was to court the financial community. This was I think the first 100 days.
After that they were trying to pass health care, and were always a few votes short in the Senate. Then in the 94 election they lost both houses, so it was just playing defense legislatively for the remainder of his two terms.
Good SCOTUS and other appointments, but no legislative victories.
At 92 convention promised to "End welfare AS WE KNOW IT".
But everything was in those last 4 words. The actual Clinton-Gingrich bill which he signed has been a total disaster.
SJG
That came from Bob Kerry of Nebraska. Front runners Clinton and Tsongas picked it up."
Tom Harken of Iowa and Jerry Brown agreed on a workers rights and union representation policy to drive US tariff laws, so they would not have been supporting anything like NAFTA.
I am hoping today that maybe Andy Yang can be the one who pushes for UBI and gets it picked up by whomever the front runners turn out to be.
SJG
President Donald J Trump cannot win the 2020 Presidential Elections using his supporters alone.
He will need to win over Independents & Moderates in order to return to the White House...
The same exact scenario applies to whoever is the Democratic Nominee...
Moderates & Independents will determine the outcome of the 2020 Elections...
Michigan, Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, Ohio, Florida & Arizona...
Whichever candidate wins a majority of these states wins the 2020 Presidential Election...
I will be supporting Vice President Joe Biden because he is the one best position to assemble the Obama Coalition & rally to victory in November 2020...
Based on the facts before me I believe President Donald J Trump will win Ohio & Florida...
Vice President Joe Biden will win Arizona, Pennsylvania & Wisconsin...
Michigan seems like a toss up to me right now...
A lot can change between now & November 2020 but these are predictions right now...
If Vice President Joe Biden is able to recapture the White working Class Voters who voted for both Former President Barack Obama & President Donald J Trump then Vice President Joe Biden wins the 2020 Presidential Election...
Progressive are a tiny minority of the Democratic Party...
Moderates who make up the Largest Majority of the Democratic Party want Uncle Joe Biden
The DNC didn’t push Hillary Clinton on us...
Hillary Clinton was the Candidate because 3 Million People votes for her than Bernie Sanders...
Heck there isn’t a Realistic Party to the Nomination for Bernie Sanders if he can’t win over the Black Vote...
There is only one candidate who is best position to recapture the Midwest & that candidate is Former Vice President Joe Biden...
Progressive policies including free healthcare for illegals & Decriminalizing Border Crossing isn’t gonna win you a Election in the Midwestern States critical to the Presidency...
_______________
Good point, and I think he can, but even more significant is that Biden has a huge lead in the polls among AA voters:
https://www.cnn.com/2019/07/13/politics/…
I take it this is nothing more than a carry-over from being Obama's VP?
Just nominate a decent, sane person, one committed to reunifying the country and creating more good jobs. Someone who loves America and doesn’t think all white people are bigots. The problem is, none of the 20 candidates meet this criteria.
-------------
LOL!
@Mark94 copied the above passage, verbatim, from Tom Friedman's NY Times article. You can do a Google search to verify. Mark is such an original thinker!
Friedman makes a good point about not nominating someone with revolutionary ideas. For example, improve the ACA and give the option to buy into Medicaire without throwing 150M people off their private insurance. Incremental changes.
If every illegal was deported Trumps businesses would be among the first to fail.
👍🏻
As far as Skibum, no one should have to put up with him.
SJG
Got a million dollars to invest in a business ? Got an engineering degree ? Come on in !
Planning on living off welfare ? See you later !
That’s a system that works.
That type of Australian system, that does not do anything good.
We have a hard enough time finding adequate jobs for our own educated people as it is now.
Being able to have employment which uses your skills is really a privilege, not a guarantee, and not properly understood as any kind of an obligation either.
SJG
Most of this stuff you guys are posting is just about protecting America's Rich from America's Poor.
SJG
IMO immigration needs to be legal and controlled bc it's hard to assimilate so many people at once - but throughout US history one can argue immigrants have given more than have taken away - not to mention that many considered Americans are from immigrant backgrounds themselves.
Problem is 1. Most attempts to control are just racism, and idiotic ideas from right wing media.
2. Hard to control when there are problems in other places in the world, and so you have refugees who are desperate.
SJG
SJG
But people don't want to see this, so we have wide spread poverty, environmental devastation, and don't forget about the two world wars.
In the 1870's it was ending reconstruction in the South, so that it could be a consumer base, and using the West as a raw materials base.
In the 1870's, the issue was over production of steel, in the UK, causing a recession. Those recessions hurt, but they also tell us that we are no longer in scarcity economies, but are in surplus economies.
In the 1930's it was simply the wild money orgy, created by advancing technology, but also by Harding dropping the 90% top tax bracket.
It had to end.
Keynesianism did wonders for a long time, but it still would have had its limits. Anyway, people elected Ronald Reagan, and ever since we have operated on Voodoo Economics.
Having a job is no longer a right nor an obligation.
Full employment is no longer desireable or practical.
We live on a spaceship, we must protect it ecologically, and making sure there is adequate distrubution has to be the objective.
Concerns about things like federal coffers really are secondary. We adjust our money system to make what we need to do happen. The money system is not the objective and it is not what controls us.
SJG
You could do worse than show up at some random citizenship swearing in ceremony, and congratulating our newest Americans.
Liz Warren is very capable. If anyone pulled off an upset and beat Biden, it would be her. Both Biden and Warren would beat Trump.
Bernie Sanders and Kamala Harris would have a shot at beating Trump, but I wouldn't want to take a risk. Bernie is too polarizing, whereas Biden will snag a substantial amount of Independent votes.
That's about it. If I could choose, Liz Warren would win. She lays out her plans and I think she would get shit done. My second choice would be Biden. Third would be Bernie, and Kamala would place fourth.
I don't really care about any other candidates at this point.
LOL, if you removed every "illegal alien" from this country, average people wouldn't be able to afford food. Undocumented workers are a huge part of the agricultural industry. So if starvation is the prosperity you are talking about, then you're spot on.
Skibum posted, "A nice incremental change would be removing every illegal alien. Prosperity would follow."
We have a broken economic system. We already produce enough of everything which everyone needs so that every person could live better than royalty had in the past. How much more prosperity do you expect?
If you mean building up huge holdings in the stock and real estate markets, that is just profiting from labor divisions. Beyond a point that becomes very harmful to our economy and ecology.
You Skibum want to hold onto a world where you live off of the sweat of others.
SJG
Alice Smith -- House of the Rising Sun
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d2dthrNN…
http://alicesmith.com/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alice_Smit…
Cry -- Doyle Bramhall II and Alice Smith
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DWey5olF…
Gary Clark Jr. - Bright Lights w/ Doyle Bramhall II, note the introduction of harmonic notes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x_ZeDn-h…
A Landmark Study on the Origins of Alcoholism
https://getpocket.com/explore/item/a-lan…
ALICE SMITH - love don't live here anymore
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OQr3CBuL…
I absolutely did not, and I'm not sure how you can spin it that way when my point was quite clear. Someone made a comment about removing every undocumented worker, so I pointed out that if that were to happen, Americans would starve. I said nothing slavery, I simply pointed out how prevalent immigrants are in agriculture and that our agricultural industry would collapse if we removed the people who make it thrive. Point out where I was wrong. Even if I were to say that the cheap labor of immigrants is beneficial to me, there is absolutely nothing racist about saying that. Facts aren't racist.
Nothing I said even hinted that all I care about was exploiting immigrants for cheap labor. You are really reaching with that one, unless you are really stupid enough to have had my point actually go over your head.
I have immigrants in my family, in fact my stepmom did not even get her citizenship until right before the 2016 election.
I clearly know much more about immigration than you and have probably been a far better ally to undocumented immigrants than you ever will be.
That’s my contribution 💙
In the latest SurveyMonkey/NBC poll out Friday, Trump is at 48% and he reached 49% in a daily YouGov.com poll this month.
At one point, all the Democrats needed to win back the Presidency was not be crazy. The Dem debates, and the Squad, have failed that test.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.washing…
As someone in their mid-70’s, I feel qualified to say Biden is too old (as is Trump) and the country needs a different type of choice than last time.
There’s still a good chance we’ll be in recession by election year. The first quarter of 2019 had a reverse yield curve, which is and has been a precursor to every one of the last seven recessions.
Elizabeth Warren has a good mind, has well thought out policy positions and is very capable, but lacks an electability gene in my view. I just don’t see people getting behind her.
The Dem. Party really fucked Sanders 4 years ago when they kept backing (and funding) Hillary despite their members clamoring for Bernie. But the fact is I think he’d have a stroke if he did the job a President should do.
Of course the current POTUS doesn’t do the job - ignores of skips briefings, is unprepared for meetings, etc. I never heard a POTUS admit to having free time until DT came along.
Yeah, I am sick and tired of low unemployment, high growth, more favorable trade agreements, and troop drawdowns. Fucking Trump !
https://siptequila.com/products/adictivo…
SJG
The most complicated cars ever made
https://www.autocar.co.uk/slideshow/most…
Consequently, it is entirely possible that President Turdbucket will be re-elected.
Gotta watch our for war with Iran.
Trying to understand it:
https://theweek.com/articles/854175/brit…
Iran Crisis
https://www.theguardian.com/politics/201…
SJG
Paramore: Hard Times
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AEB6ibtd…
Democrats have been too timid.
SJG
After all your talk about greed, have you ever seen a POTUS as greedy as this fuck.
You are great complaining about Trump but never offer up even a slightest mention of who is better because you have no one. Haha and keep up with muh Russians, that is working great.
consider this
Economist Mike Kimel has noted that the former Democratic Presidents (Bill Clinton, Jimmy Carter, Lyndon B. Johnson, John F. Kennedy, and Harry S. Truman) all reduced public debt as a share of GDP, while the last four Republican Presidents (George W. Bush, George H. W. Bush, Ronald Reagan and Gerald Ford) all oversaw an increase in the country's indebtedness.[38] Economic historian J. Bradford DeLong, observed a contrast not so much between Republicans and Democrats but between Democrats and "old-style Republicans (Eisenhower and Nixon)" on one hand (decreasing debt) and "new-style Republicans" on the other (increasing debt).[39][40] David Stockman, former director of the Office of Management and Budget, blamed the "ideological tax-cutters" of the Reagan administration for the increase of national debt during the 1980s.[41] Former Treasury official Bruce Bartlett attributed the increase in the national debt since the 1980s to the policy of "starve the beast".[42][43] While noting that George H.W. Bush's budget deal in 1990 was one of the reasons for improvement of the fiscal situation in 1990s, Bartlett was highly critical of George W. Bush for creating budget deficits by reducing tax rates and increasing spending in the early 2000s
And the four women progressive democrats in the House is a most encouraging sign.
SJG
SJG
Lots of weird and dangerous stuff going on.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/sou…
SJG
This is why overstimulation will create, an asset bubble, with more risk being added to the quest for greater returns.
“ a remarkable rumor is circulating among some Democrats. This is – in the words of one source – that Mueller is ‘slowly losing his faculties’, that at the age of 74, the former special counsel is going senile. The source went on to say that this was one reason why Mueller had been ‘so intent’ on limiting the time and scope of the hearings today.”
“This particular source was a senior official in the last presidential administration and maintains good lines of communication into the DoJ. Democrats had a slightly different version of this rumor when Mueller handed in his report to the attorney general, William Barr. Then, they were briefing that the White House would brief that Mueller had dementia, spinning a lie in order to undermine what the administration fully expected would be a brutal report damning the president as a traitor.
Now that Mueller’s report is not what they wanted, these same Democrats are starting to believe that ‘lie’. It is tempting to see a psychological explanation for this.
For two years, President Trump’s critics viewed Mueller as a kind of superman, cape fluttering in the wind, who would destroy the Trump presidency with a mighty blow from a righteous fist. When Mueller said he could not prove – or ‘establish’ – that collusion had taken place, there was puzzlement and disappointment. He had not even tried to subpoena the President. He must have lost his mind.
The late request for Mueller to have a second by his side, his deputy, Aaron Zebley, has only turned up the heat under this simmering pot. One Democrat said it was ‘amazing’ that he had asked an aide to join him as a witness. President Trump himself agreed, tweeting that Zebley’s appearance was ‘a disgrace’. ‘VERY UNFAIR, SHOULD NOT BE ALLOWED. A rigged Witch Hunt!’”
On one hand you have the fractured, ineffective and flaccid democratic party comprised of slimy politicians each with their own self-serving agenda.
On the other hand you have the energetic and dynamic trump with a single unifying banner that crosses all party lines "make america great again"
One man, one army, one purpose. Trump is handily winning the game of thrones.
Additionally, none of the democrats take down attempts are working - trump relishes as the democrats exhaust themselves throwing any accusation that can stick as well as paint themselves into a corner by trump labelling the anti-american and far-left "Squad" as the face of the party.
2020 is going to be a bloodbath for the democrats and i wouldnt be surprised to see a reaganesque electoral landslide for trump.
that Nicole was really IceyLoco this whole time? Both always seemed to post at the same times and have disappeared at exactly the same time...
that Nicole was really IceyLoco this whole time? Both always seemed to post at the same times and have disappeared at exactly the same time..."
Too different of writing styles. They may know each other in real life though. Both bitter women.
To crush your enemies, to see them driven before you, and to hear the lamentations of their women
Mark94, good insights. But there will always be two parties, even if one of them takes a set back, even if the names change. After Nixon people predicted that the Republican Party was done for. Didn't last long though.
SJG
SJG
Frances Wright (September 6, 1795 – December 13, 1852), widely known as Fanny Wright, was a Scottish-born lecturer, writer, freethinker, feminist, abolitionist, and social reformer, who became a US citizen in 1825. The same year, she founded the Nashoba Commune in Tennessee, as a utopian community to demonstrate how to prepare slaves for eventual emancipation, but the project lasted only five years. In the late 1820s Wright was the first woman lecturer to speak publicly before gatherings of men and women in the United States about political and social-reform issues. She advocated for universal education, the emancipation of slaves, birth control, equal rights, sexual freedom, legal rights for married women, and liberal divorce laws. Wright was also vocal in her opposition to organized religion and capital punishment. The clergy and the press harshly criticized Wright's radical views. Her public lectures in the United States led to the establishment of Fanny Wright societies and her association with the Working Men's Party, organized in New York City in 1829, became so strong that its opponents called the party’s slate of candidates the Fanny Wright ticket.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frances_Wr…
SJG
Lots and lots of Americans would love to have an SEIU job. SEIU members elected Stern, are you going to call them "losers" you fucking creep?
SJG
Fucking morons.
Unless the U.S. can field a viable third party, America is fucked.