It would be nice if the ignored post showed the poster's name in addition to the generic text - and for threads started by someone on ignore also show the title of the thread.
Also was a big fan of the block. The reason being is that certain people, thankfully not a lot, don't know how to have civil conversations. By placing those people on block you could then start a thread where the conversation would devolve into pure mudslinging and insults.
Twentyfive I was wondering how Icey was able to post in your topic. I was gonna scold you for not having him on ignore but now I see what's up. What a shame.
I would agree with you TFP that the block system encouraged civility. If you insulted someone enough they could just block you so there was a reason for people to temper their discussion tone.
The haters were going after blondbomb hard, but then stopped abruptly after blondbomb put them on ignore. I didn’t realize at the time why the pistola/txtittyfag accidental wrong account slip comment had disappeared, until later I realized about the comment thread disappearing.
*But* if she had the ability to use that feature all along, then it could have been a fun thread the way she intended that didn’t have to diverge the way it did.
Even if the OP is using ignore, the troll just has to redirect the comments from the other participants away from the thread.
And it’s all still not censorship. Somebody can still make his/her own threads.
I like ignore better than block, but I'm with Papi I think there would be some value to showing a little more info. For example, if you could indicate the poster name if I Ignored the poster or the thread name if I ignored the thread.
Not a gripe, the way it is now isn't bad. Just noting that it could be more useful the other way...
The problem with the block rather than ignore is you have two posters that are actively trying to undermine posts, I don’t really care what they have to say, and I’m far from thin skinned, but if you allow people to just come out and try to take over the conversation there’s no point to a discussion, especially when the both of the two I had ignored will spam the fuck out of a topic and do their best to drive everyone away. Realistically a smart ass remark is fine I make them from time to time, but @founder this is ridiculous we have a post about one topic and ignore one will come on and say make out with her in the front room, and take off your pants, then ignore two will come on and say these geriatric tricks are picking on me sorry founder but I bet I’m not the only one that is more than disinterested in dealing with those two.
From my end, TUSCL was down for a while and just came back up. May have been some other broad based Internet problem going on today too. Anyone else see this.
+1 for what 25 said. Virtually all of my blocked posters are trolls and I'm sure that this is the same for most. It is doubtful that a troll is going to add anything meaningful to a thread and far more likely that said troll will derail the thread with crap. The discussion board was a better place due to this control and not having it is going to turn this back into a circus whenever a troll chooses to run wild.
I think that users should have the ability to keep other disruptive users from participating in threads that they create. Similar to how we now have the ability to restrict from our discussion feed the threads that we deem to be junk threads (for whatever reason).
Users have plenty of opportunities to express their thoughts and opinions with the 'block' function in place. If a certain user finds him or herself blocked by many, then that says more about the discourse of that widely-ignored user and not those doing the blocking.
Even if you ignore a poster, it doesn't mean other people will ignore him. Then your thread will devolve into people talking about what the ignored poster wants them talking about rather than the topic you posted.
See what you’re doing @founder you’re now giving those morons that are blocked all of those necrothreads to drown out the real users of the board. I hope your satisfied SJG has now started appropriating Skibums post to pester everyone so the only option is to ignore a post from someone else
SJG you and two others are the ones dragging conversations down to a stupid level, you are acting the same as those Russians that hacked Facebook you find someplace where you’re not ignored and like a cockroach you crawl in and try to take it away from whom it belongs to.
25 and I don't always see eye to eye, but he is 100% right on this one. The anti-trolling controls that were in place were working. I have a long block list, for good reason. But I am also admittedly abrasive at times, so anyone who doesn't like my posts could block me.
For example, PaulDrake was free to continue his DFW advertising threads, er, I mean his insightful club intel posts, without my interference. Also, for some reason blondbombshell decided to block me which, while a mystery to me since I never had any interaction with her, apparently made her more comfortable. While I wasn't thrilled about being blocked from their threads, it was an acceptable trade-off to having my own threads packed with troll garbage.
@RD It seems that these folks have more rights, because they refuse to follow the rules, I’m far from the most prolific reviewer here on the site, but I get along with others reasonably well, genuinely curb my most disruptive impulses, yet @founder favors the folks that publish tons of off topic drivel, drive women and newbies away, even copy and paste shit from the private section of the forum, like I said earlier I’m far from thin skinned and give as good as I get but sometimes it gets tiresome, as a result I haven’t gotten the motivation to write more than a single review at a time because I feel like what I and you and many others do to drive traffic to this site isn’t appreciated. No I am not interested in a tissue flagooner, and I get that there are others that feel different but I’d bet more are in line with my thinking on this subject than not.
Block creates a better user experience (particularly for dancers) and cleaner threads.
I continue to believe that users should have greater control over who participates in the threads they create. There are plenty of ways for users to express their views via their own threads and in threads created by those who have not blocked them.
This reversion back to 'ignore' encourages more drama and bickering.
===> "I continue to believe that users should have greater control over who participates in the threads they create. There are plenty of ways for users to express their views via their own threads and in threads created by those who have not blocked them."
Agreed, within reason. I'm not a big fan of blocking users just because they disagree with me, but being able to keep the unrelated troll crap out is huge.
Below is an example of the type of cool and civil conversation we can have when there is no troll nonsense. I hadn't posted a fun brag thread like this in years because they inevitably fell apart into troll crap. Aren't stories like this what many of us enjoy about a site like this? There are several other examples of good and topical posts in VIP as well. Why in the world do we want to go back to a situation where trolls can firebomb threads at will?
Blocking someone from one's thread is also blocking them from the comments everyone else is making in the thread, I think it's overkill - if one doesn't like someone's opinion then not seeing their post should suffice
===> "Blocking someone from one's thread is also blocking them from the comments everyone else is making in the thread..."
Then so be it. It beats a troll posting 30 off-topic posts in a 60 post thread, or bumping with blank posts, or copying and pasting the same comment over and over, or...[insert BS here]. In other words, all the shit that has been happening over the past several years that often make the discussion threads all but pointless.
Papi said "Blocking someone from one's thread is also blocking them from the comments everyone else is making in the thread, I think it's overkill."
I don't. Actually, it's a feature, not a flaw. Blocked/ignored users almost never enter threads started by those they dislike to have a civil conversation with the other commenters. Usually, it's to pick fights with anyone available to derail a thread or lobby against the OP, etc.
"if one doesn't like someone's opinion then not seeing their post should suffice"
Not really. Once ignored users and viewable users start bantering / bickering back and forth, the thread becomes difficult or impossible to parse... primarily to the person who took the time to create the thread.
And simply not seeing posts does nothing to address how easily threads can be derailed by an ignored user.
@Papi I don’t block because I find someone disagreeing with me,I block because they are just intentionally derailing a thread, IDGAF if they can’t see my posts they only use anything you post to find a disagreement. There is less than zero value to me in participating in general nastiness, when you have a moron who thinks everyone is obligated to do things his way or else he try’s to change the topic to tell everyone he’s the worlds greatest PUA via front room makeout sessions, or a slug who thinks he’s funny by malignant posting and misspelling every word for ten years, or a guy ( questionable) who addresses everyone as trick or ho, they don’t deserve to read my threads if you want them on your threads that’s your business Some people don’t deserve my consideration and fuck them.
Trolls mainly exist bc posters keep feeding them - ignoring them via Ignore-function and not getting into a back-and-forth 20-post battle with them sometimes months-on-end would eliminate most of the problems - the augmented Ignore features for the most part make it so trolls are not much of an issue unless you make it one
^ I maintain that the ignore feature is not augmented, it took out the claws of the block feature which gave the idiots a reason to behave themselves without any moderation.
Yep, the big advantage of block is, you could have a thread and keep it from getting disrupted and disrailed, which is the real aim of the trolls. Ignore does nothing for that -- you can't see the particular troll, but you can see all the troll feeders filling up the thread with responses and arguments. Block was an amazing good tool to keep the increasingly-overwhelmed high quality threads in this group, on track with on-topic content
The full-on block means if someone doesn't like you they can keep you from fully participating on the board (by not allowing you to see any posts, not just yours, in a particular thread).
Lack of moderation is a big part of TUSCL's success IMO - and I think Founder has done a good job of adding features so anyone can individually moderate (if they choose to individually moderate including not feeding the trolls)
^ so what if they block you, do you really give a flying fuck if there’s a post you don’t participate in, boo fuckin hoo I really don’t give a fuck, if they don’t want me in their post sob, sob.
I just contend that no one should keep anyone else from expressing their view/opinion - ordinances often begin with good intentions and then are subsequently abused - it may start with trolls but easily starts getting used for simple spats that often flame-up on TUSCL.
^ and I contend that if you wanna play with the other characters you need to learn how to get along They have ever opportunity to piss themselves jus not on my lawn
^^^ "I just contend that no one should keep anyone else from expressing their view/opinion - ordinances often begin with good intentions and then are subsequently abused"
Perhaps the Ignore feature can be extended to individual posts that way when a flame war breaks-out in a thread one can eliminate those individual posts keeping only the on-point posts visible
@Papi If they can post in any thread they want, you take away the incentive to keep them reasonable, look a while back dougster & txtty paralyzed the board, DC, SJG, and Icey were trying to do the same thing, most of the folks here have a short back and forth, and it's over, but those guys you are giving free rein to, have every intention of overrunning the board, because they're just miserable, and misery loves company. Most folks won't block arbitrarily, the few that have a large block list don't create a lot of content anyway. I think founder should bring back the block, and leave it, I respect your right to disagree, the ones I'm tired of, do not respect anything so they don't deserve the privilege.
I know I'm a new guy, but if I understand the issue right, I have to agree with the people who think that blocking is better than simply ignoring.
Am I right in assuming that the board used to have a block feature that would keep blocked people from posting on a discussion? And that it's been changed now so that you only can't see it when they do?
If someone is doing nothing but make nonsense posts that add nothing to the discussion, or derail it, or just to attack people, why not allow the discussion starter block them? The retards can go start their own discussion and attack, derail and nonsensify it all they want.
I know some web sites operate on page hits, so maybe the site owner gets more hits when not blocking?
^ You are correct about the issue Unique clicks on ads bring revenue to websites meaning from different users, but I don’t think it applies to message boards
prevert, this site already suffers from people making too many new threads for no reason, instead of reusing old ones.
And also we have a huge contingent, 25 being one of them, who believes that this site should be restricted to talk about guys coming in their pants, and right wing news and politics. They want to bring the site down to their level.
They are selling TUSCLer's and this site way short.
Wow. Do you always just make shit up like that? I see plenty of conversations about other things than those you mention. I also see plenty of conversations that you and others have "reused" for crap that has nothing to do with the original topic.
^ most here have made the mistake of trying to reason with the lunatic, it never works, he never responds to a direct question, he just runs his mouth and spews insult after insult, stick around you'll see for yourself.
===> "Trolls mainly exist bc posters keep feeding them -"
I used to believe this too, but no more. Here on tuscl I found a whole new breed of troll, able to sustain itself with little to no interaction. On here, trolls with autistic tendendcies will cut and paste the same posts over and over endlessly just for the heck of it. On here, trolls will blow up threads without anyone interacting with them just because they feel like. On most sites, when normal remedies - like ignoring - fail, there is ultimately someone who can administer an antibiotic to kill the infection. On here, the infection takes over and turns the whole board to shit.
I thought that the thread block was a healthy and modest compromise. There is nothing stopping a troll from creating his own counter-threads if he so chooses or posting whatever else he wants in his own threads or in places where he is not blocked. After all, it's not like most of these trolls don't have multiple accounts anyway, so they'll certainly know if someone who has blocked them posted something.
Like I said, I don't give a shit if someone disagrees with me. indeed, I often enjoy the back and forth. But trolling is a completely different animal and I don't put that in the same "freedom of speech" category because its intent is to do nothing more than to incite, derail and otherwise cause chaos.
It's interesting that san_jose_creep doesn't think he is a troll and is not making a personal attack when he constantly calls guys chumps for actually liking to get lapdances from strippers.
My very first post to TUSCL was simply in a cordial discussion with other guys that like and willingly choose to LDK in a private dance. And his "contribution" to me was to call me a chump and a mark deluded by a clip joint scam. Then later I realized that he doesn't actually go to strip clubs and that everything he posts about strippers is a fantasy theory in his own head as opposed to him actually experiencing what he is preaching.
All that said I don't care about block or ignore myself. I just ignore anything I don't want to read. founder's choice.
-->""Don't feed the trolls" has been an ineffective mantra since UseNet."
That "don't feed the trolls" mantra is borderline delusional. There's always enough people who won't play along. The ignore-block was finally a tool that could keep a troll from running amuck in your threads, but maybe founder is trolling his own forum by taking it away :) Of course, very few of you nincompoops bothered to use it. Last thread I created starting getting trolled, I blocked a single troll for a couple of weeks, we had an interesting thread, then when it scrolled away to oblivion I unblocked him again. No idea why so few people used it, it worked great
While I prefer the 2 way block instead of just ignore, this is @founder's playground so whatever rules he wants are fine by me regardless of his reasoning.
But if @founder ever wants to put it to a vote I vote for block.
subra. I did it too. and then I unblocked him. haven’t seen hem cents. so right now I have not blocked anybody nor in Norred anybody. i’m letting the errors right as they are because fucking Siri fucks up what I say so much. That wasn’t for sarah re-Siri Siri good Michael it would make life perhaps a little bit simpler. period but I fit can get tired. I was trying to carefully edit and proofread every fucking thing I post.
^ you’re a fuckin leech, you don’t write a fuckn reviews, you don’t spend a fuckn nickel, you want everything for free, shut the fuck up no one wants to hear shit from you.
Disagree all you like that’s not the point troll, do it in a respectful manner, and keep on topic, like I said you’re a fuckin leech, you don’t write a fuckn reviews, you don’t spend a fuckn nickel, you want everything for free, shut the fuck up no one wants to hear shit from you.
^^^^ 25, you think someone is only on topic if they agree with your interpretation and discuss it in your terms.
Again, you have ignore, you have thread by thread ignore, and you have the Ultimate, your Underground Circle Jerk VIP Room. Why are you even posting here, when you could be in that concealed room right now?
Hey Jose, I've been reading some of your posts, so if who I'm "listening to" keeps me from making a "good impression", you have only yourself to blame. And if someone like you says that I'm not making a good impression, well, I take that as a compliment.
It seems that some memories around here are very short. We aren't long removed from the days when trolls used to firebomb threads so badly that the board was unusable. Is anyone eager to go back to that? To things like Dougster posting literally thousand of blank posts just to bump threads? To other trolls copying and pasting the same comment literally 100 times to a point where everyone just says "fuck it" and abandons the thread?
Below is my current ignore list, minus one so i don't set him off on another round of whining. This is the cleaned up version, but some of the older names should bring back wonderful memories. If you believe that a single one of these names brought anything but disruption and fake nonsense to the board, please let me know.
I have to assume I’m the one you didn’t list to “avoid another round of whining.” So my question is, if you have me on ignore, why do read and respond to all my posts anyway? Seems like a lot of extra work
I am going to make one last point to you SJG and I'm done, you are a selfish spoiled brat, you want everything to be in your favor and refuse to allow anyone to post with out interfering, this here is a case in point. you are complaining that I or anyone, doesn't go along with what you want you will spam, insult, and generally act like a nuisance, even so far as to make up things that you know to be untrue. There is no censorship on my part, you are free to make as many threads as your heart desires, but this one is mine, I have the right to lock you out, and have been trying to exercise, my rights. I have not abridged your rights in any way. I should have the right to associate with whom I want, and NOT associate with anyone I choose not to.
The argument being made is that you make a lot of demands and create a lot of churn on a site to which you contribute sweet fuck all.
I'm supporting that argument by way of direct quotes from the guy who runs this site. And my arguments are not personal, but pertain to your behavior here.
You're response is type nonsense about negative meta whatever with one hand while using your tears as lube to masturbate frantically. At least until you get around to making threats of violence (which I suspect also gets typed with one hand...).
Wow. Talk about entitled cluelessness. I don't have anyone on ignore yet, but by the time I do I hope the site owner sees fit to re-implement the blocking I gather used to be in effect.
126 comments
Not a must-have but helpful IMO.
Twentyfive I was wondering how Icey was able to post in your topic. I was gonna scold you for not having him on ignore but now I see what's up. What a shame.
Here is one example of its positive effects:
https://www.tuscl.net/discussion.php?id=…
The haters were going after blondbomb hard, but then stopped abruptly after blondbomb put them on ignore. I didn’t realize at the time why the pistola/txtittyfag accidental wrong account slip comment had disappeared, until later I realized about the comment thread disappearing.
*But* if she had the ability to use that feature all along, then it could have been a fun thread the way she intended that didn’t have to diverge the way it did.
Even if the OP is using ignore, the troll just has to redirect the comments from the other participants away from the thread.
And it’s all still not censorship. Somebody can still make his/her own threads.
Not a gripe, the way it is now isn't bad. Just noting that it could be more useful the other way...
Realistically a smart ass remark is fine I make them from time to time, but @founder this is ridiculous we have a post about one topic and ignore one will come on and say make out with her in the front room, and take off your pants, then ignore two will come on and say these geriatric tricks are picking on me sorry founder but I bet I’m not the only one that is more than disinterested in dealing with those two.
"The advantage of using block rather than ignore is when you have two posters that are actively trying to undermine posts"
If it were BLOCK, then this all degenerates into a battle for Virtual Turf.
Thanks,
SJG
SJG
Thelonious Monk, Dizzy Gillespie, Giants Of Jazz Copenhagen 1971
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VUVuX3lL…
SJG
SJG
Users have plenty of opportunities to express their thoughts and opinions with the 'block' function in place. If a certain user finds him or herself blocked by many, then that says more about the discourse of that widely-ignored user and not those doing the blocking.
You cannot bring all conversations down to your level, or try to impose Right Wing Misogynist views on everyone else.
Skibum started that thread with AOC in the title. She does draw lots of attention.
Twentyfive, I'm sending Mamisan out to visit you.
https://www.buttpaste.com/diaper-rash-re…
SJG
;-)
So take the offered Kleenex, and Mamisan will be there soon.
SJG
SJG
Kinda like "I know you are, but what am I?"
SJG
SJG
But only one guy who earned the nickname "Sleepytime Rapist".
For example, PaulDrake was free to continue his DFW advertising threads, er, I mean his insightful club intel posts, without my interference. Also, for some reason blondbombshell decided to block me which, while a mystery to me since I never had any interaction with her, apparently made her more comfortable. While I wasn't thrilled about being blocked from their threads, it was an acceptable trade-off to having my own threads packed with troll garbage.
I continue to believe that users should have greater control over who participates in the threads they create. There are plenty of ways for users to express their views via their own threads and in threads created by those who have not blocked them.
This reversion back to 'ignore' encourages more drama and bickering.
Agreed, within reason. I'm not a big fan of blocking users just because they disagree with me, but being able to keep the unrelated troll crap out is huge.
Below is an example of the type of cool and civil conversation we can have when there is no troll nonsense. I hadn't posted a fun brag thread like this in years because they inevitably fell apart into troll crap. Aren't stories like this what many of us enjoy about a site like this? There are several other examples of good and topical posts in VIP as well. Why in the world do we want to go back to a situation where trolls can firebomb threads at will?
https://www.tuscl.net/discussion.php?id=…
Then so be it. It beats a troll posting 30 off-topic posts in a 60 post thread, or bumping with blank posts, or copying and pasting the same comment over and over, or...[insert BS here]. In other words, all the shit that has been happening over the past several years that often make the discussion threads all but pointless.
I don't. Actually, it's a feature, not a flaw. Blocked/ignored users almost never enter threads started by those they dislike to have a civil conversation with the other commenters. Usually, it's to pick fights with anyone available to derail a thread or lobby against the OP, etc.
"if one doesn't like someone's opinion then not seeing their post should suffice"
Not really. Once ignored users and viewable users start bantering / bickering back and forth, the thread becomes difficult or impossible to parse... primarily to the person who took the time to create the thread.
And simply not seeing posts does nothing to address how easily threads can be derailed by an ignored user.
Lack of moderation has a downside.
I don’t block because I find someone disagreeing with me,I block because they are just intentionally derailing a thread, IDGAF if they can’t see my posts they only use anything you post to find a disagreement. There is less than zero value to me in participating in general nastiness, when you have a moron who thinks everyone is obligated to do things his way or else he try’s to change the topic to tell everyone he’s the worlds greatest PUA via front room makeout sessions, or a slug who thinks he’s funny by malignant posting and misspelling every word for ten years, or a guy ( questionable) who addresses everyone as trick or ho, they don’t deserve to read my threads if you want them on your threads that’s your business
Some people don’t deserve my consideration and fuck them.
Lack of moderation is a big part of TUSCL's success IMO - and I think Founder has done a good job of adding features so anyone can individually moderate (if they choose to individually moderate including not feeding the trolls)
I really don’t give a fuck, if they don’t want me in their post sob, sob.
They have ever opportunity to piss themselves jus not on my lawn
@Papi makes a good point.
If they can post in any thread they want, you take away the incentive to keep them reasonable, look a while back dougster & txtty paralyzed the board, DC, SJG, and Icey were trying to do the same thing, most of the folks here have a short back and forth, and it's over, but those guys you are giving free rein to, have every intention of overrunning the board, because they're just miserable, and misery loves company. Most folks won't block arbitrarily, the few that have a large block list don't create a lot of content anyway. I think founder should bring back the block, and leave it, I respect your right to disagree, the ones I'm tired of, do not respect anything so they don't deserve the privilege.
SJG
Am I right in assuming that the board used to have a block feature that would keep blocked people from posting on a discussion? And that it's been changed now so that you only can't see it when they do?
If someone is doing nothing but make nonsense posts that add nothing to the discussion, or derail it, or just to attack people, why not allow the discussion starter block them? The retards can go start their own discussion and attack, derail and nonsensify it all they want.
I know some web sites operate on page hits, so maybe the site owner gets more hits when not blocking?
Unique clicks on ads bring revenue to websites meaning from different users, but I don’t think it applies to message boards
And also we have a huge contingent, 25 being one of them, who believes that this site should be restricted to talk about guys coming in their pants, and right wing news and politics. They want to bring the site down to their level.
They are selling TUSCLer's and this site way short.
SJG
prevert, I do not know who you are or who you are listening too, but you are not making a good impression.
SJG
Maybe not on you, Sleepytime Rapist.
SJG
I used to believe this too, but no more. Here on tuscl I found a whole new breed of troll, able to sustain itself with little to no interaction. On here, trolls with autistic tendendcies will cut and paste the same posts over and over endlessly just for the heck of it. On here, trolls will blow up threads without anyone interacting with them just because they feel like. On most sites, when normal remedies - like ignoring - fail, there is ultimately someone who can administer an antibiotic to kill the infection. On here, the infection takes over and turns the whole board to shit.
I thought that the thread block was a healthy and modest compromise. There is nothing stopping a troll from creating his own counter-threads if he so chooses or posting whatever else he wants in his own threads or in places where he is not blocked. After all, it's not like most of these trolls don't have multiple accounts anyway, so they'll certainly know if someone who has blocked them posted something.
Like I said, I don't give a shit if someone disagrees with me. indeed, I often enjoy the back and forth. But trolling is a completely different animal and I don't put that in the same "freedom of speech" category because its intent is to do nothing more than to incite, derail and otherwise cause chaos.
This is the last I'll post in this thread.
My very first post to TUSCL was simply in a cordial discussion with other guys that like and willingly choose to LDK in a private dance. And his "contribution" to me was to call me a chump and a mark deluded by a clip joint scam. Then later I realized that he doesn't actually go to strip clubs and that everything he posts about strippers is a fantasy theory in his own head as opposed to him actually experiencing what he is preaching.
All that said I don't care about block or ignore myself. I just ignore anything I don't want to read. founder's choice.
That "don't feed the trolls" mantra is borderline delusional. There's always enough people who won't play along. The ignore-block was finally a tool that could keep a troll from running amuck in your threads, but maybe founder is trolling his own forum by taking it away :) Of course, very few of you nincompoops bothered to use it. Last thread I created starting getting trolled, I blocked a single troll for a couple of weeks, we had an interesting thread, then when it scrolled away to oblivion I unblocked him again. No idea why so few people used it, it worked great
But if @founder ever wants to put it to a vote I vote for block.
i’m letting the errors right as they are because fucking Siri fucks up what I say so much. That wasn’t for sarah re-Siri Siri good Michael it would make life perhaps a little bit simpler. period but I fit can get tired. I was trying to carefully edit and proofread every fucking thing I post.
You have ignore. You have thread by thread ignore. And you have your Underground Circle Jerk VIP Room.
You have nothing to complain about!
SJG
SJG
John Mayer, live, really good
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=83O0YrP4…
Feminism
https://www.tuscl.net/discussion.php?id=…
Hang in their 25, Mamisan will be there soon.
She's using you as part of this continuing study:
https://www.babylist.com/hello-baby/best…
SJG
drop mic
This here is the front room of a forum. People start threads, then others can post on them, whether the OP agrees with them or not.
You do though have the ability to ignore members.
Otherwise, you can't just by yelling the most loudly, run people off.
SJG
you’re a fuckin leech, you don’t write a fuckn reviews, you don’t spend a fuckn nickel, you want everything for free, shut the fuck up no one wants to hear shit from you.
Flame War!
Again, you have ignore, you have thread by thread ignore, and you have the Ultimate, your Underground Circle Jerk VIP Room. Why are you even posting here, when you could be in that concealed room right now?
SJG
It sounds like you are the one he doesn't want derailing his discussions.
But no, its not just people he agrees with who are allowed to post. He doesn't own the turf. This forum has worked well because it is very open.
Now in that Underground Circle Jerk VIP Room, more of the people are likely to agree with him.
SJG
Below is my current ignore list, minus one so i don't set him off on another round of whining. This is the cleaned up version, but some of the older names should bring back wonderful memories. If you believe that a single one of these names brought anything but disruption and fake nonsense to the board, please let me know.
san_jose_guy
THEWHITEKNIGHT
4got2wipe
Nicole1994
Pistrolla
Rxeza
bruno0639
ANTIFAggot
mdb2203
sandyfuckme
26shikha89
bigblowjob
warhawks
rickydugan
jester2I4
rickthelion
tobala
Alabama
originaljuicebox69
TheProphetJuice
BlueLion
RickyBoyDugan
SnackBox69
BBBJBecky
Dougster_Izzakunt
Hard4Dancers
Joker420
JackFrost9
Gucci_Mane
LordxBetty
Dracula
juiicebox69
slaux.pas
Super_Mane
zipman68
BagBoyJames
Caprisun69
But remember, this forum has thrived because it draws people here, and I say that that is because of only the very lightest moderation.
SJG
https://www.tuscl.net/app/discussion.php…
"SJG, you have zero reviews, and you don't pay. Those two things are the value of the site. Discussion board? Yeah, not so much."
"SJG, you are a relentless socialist. Taking what you can from our free discussion site and giving nothing in return."
SJG
SJG
There is no censorship on my part, you are free to make as many threads as your heart desires, but this one is mine, I have the right to lock you out, and have been trying to exercise, my rights. I have not abridged your rights in any way. I should have the right to associate with whom I want, and NOT associate with anyone I choose not to.
I'm supporting that argument by way of direct quotes from the guy who runs this site. And my arguments are not personal, but pertain to your behavior here.
You're response is type nonsense about negative meta whatever with one hand while using your tears as lube to masturbate frantically. At least until you get around to making threats of violence (which I suspect also gets typed with one hand...).
In fact, you're the one doing this.
What you do not have is the ability to stop me from posting on front room threads. So what.
It is you two who are the spoiled brats.
SJG
Sue me.
For a guy who argues that there's no such thing as Aspergers, you really have a shit-ton of on-spectrum behaviors.
I, on the other hand, am not interested in that.
SJG
Feminism
https://www.tuscl.net/discussion.php?id=…
John Algeo, this guy is really good
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2kdRaIc1…
John Algeo: The Ancient Mysteries and Modern Masonry
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=59x66gcT…
You are working against the health of this forum.
Get yourself to that circle jerk room.
SJG
It's a solid bet that you're counting the minutes to "People's Court". #wapner #rainman
LOL
The lights are kept low and your needs will be met.
SJG
SJG
It means nothing.
SJG
SJG