Why is fucking a 10 better than fucking an 8?
flagooner
Everything written by this member is a fact.
This is a serious question.
Most have stated that the 1-10 rating is based on looks only. In other threads guys have stated that they only want to spend time with the hottest chick in the club.
For me, if they are pretty enough to get you horny the looks have done its job. From there they are all on an equal plane and it is the rest of the factors that make the experience superior to another.
Unless you are looking at it as a conquest and want to just brag and impress other guys I don't get it.
Most have stated that the 1-10 rating is based on looks only. In other threads guys have stated that they only want to spend time with the hottest chick in the club.
For me, if they are pretty enough to get you horny the looks have done its job. From there they are all on an equal plane and it is the rest of the factors that make the experience superior to another.
Unless you are looking at it as a conquest and want to just brag and impress other guys I don't get it.
Got something to say?
Start your own discussion
42 comments
This is a trick question. You can keep your $20,000 cuz I ain't nobody's bitch.
That never happens, but I’ll still take the $100,000.00
I'm going to humor you because you seem in earnest, and let's just say it's a 7 who has buggy eyes who we're grading on a curve.
Fucking an 8 (or 7 with buggy eyes) is hot because of how much her internal temperature increases when you tell her you're about to cum inside her.
So relating to the OP, i can kind of say that once a girl is attractive enough for you to be "content" with her looks, making her even more attractive if even only slightly (and the OP, i guess there isn't a big difference between an 8 and 10, although i tend to differ on that opinion) isn't going to do much for you if you are generally happy with all the other things about her.
Now this applies more IRL than in strip clubs. If you were trying to get a wife or even a serious GF, she doesn't have to be a 10. Just like if i were to buy a car, it doesn't have to be a Ferrari (assuming i have the means, Ferris Bueller) or similar supercar. It can be any very nice quality car with good looks and performance. But if it's just for the day (off), i want the Ferrari and the supermodel (although i don't know if Mia Sara was ever considered a supermodel).
I've heard of those studies but "data" can often be interpreted in different ways.
I agree that having little $$$ can cause unhappiness/hardship and making $75k can alleviate most of that - but one would think anyone given the choice b/w making $75k/yr or $1M/yr that they would choose the latter and the latter can make life significantly more enjoyable.
IMO I would categorize it as $75k being the min to live ok, not that it doesn't make any difference after that, IMO.
This study obviously did not account for motherfuckers who love the strippers. I'm thinking $300K is the optimal income. If you make any more, you're a simp who they can only think about taking advantage of.
I'm still working this out with NinaBambina, though. She thinks it's $50 million and I think she has a nice back and face.
Lol yeah my back is a great quality of mine.
;)
I have been around for a while and you can test me but you can't fool me about your face.
Queen troll out
Generally speaking, for strippers, I think a “7” is where the income potential starts to level out on looks alone.
After that: work ethic, hustle, and personality start becoming more important for making money.
Based on that, I think a lot of men would agree with you, Flagooner. (At least subconsciously).
But I take way too much leisure time off my job for that. And I had to face the fact that that isn’t what drives me.
Nowhere did I say all else equal or even imply it. In fact, it was specifically said that other things are not equal.
"...it is the rest of the factors that make the experience superior to another..."
I must be wired a bit differently than y'all. I find the experience much more enjoyable when there is actual feeling involved. I'd much rather fuck a 7 that is enthusiastic and knows what she is doing than a 10 who goes through the motions roboticly and seems happy to be relieved when it's done.
Yeah, if everything else is even of course the prettier one would be icing on the cake.
I guess I'm saying is that the difference that looks brings to the table, 8 vs. 10, is so small that the other factors determine so much.
I always read about guys bragging about fucking a 10, but rarely anything about the experience other than that to make it sound like it was memorable.
Unfortunately, this is rarely the case.
> Unfortunately, this is rarely the case.
I don't know why this is, but usually the hottest ones give me a lot more.
Ok, I will let you off on a technicality as long as you look up at me with those buggy eyes.
But, we go for women who are 8+ because that is the level at which the physical rating becomes far more individual and subjective. What I call a '9' likely has a specific look that *really* works for me in a way that probably doesn't work for other guys.
And, if I can get some time with that 8+ woman and she's not a dud... well, that's going to be a good night for me.
Who doesn't want that?
If I only made $75K a year I would be miserable, I have no idea how anyone can get buy with that shit of an income and still be happy. Getting pussy makes me very happy and pussy costs money. The more money, the more pussy, the more happy. In addition, the better looking and more fun the pussy, the more happy.
Now if that study said something like "After all life expenses are covered, we gave each subject enough $ per hour to fuel all his sexual fantasies non-stop with the type of women he is most attracted to and determined that it would require a maximum of $5.5 million per year." then I would say $5.5 million per year would be the threshold and anything after that would not make me any happier.
If I'm visiting a club for the first/possibly only time, I'm generally going to look for the most physically attractive dancer there to spend time with. But if I'm going back to a place more than once, I've had cases where I chose a less attractive dancer than the top of the range for various reasons: compatability, level of service, cost, or just a desire for variety amongst them.
As for the "ideal income" discussion, the point most seem to have missed from the original report was that increasing income (generally) brings with it greater responsibility and corresponding stress.
The idea was that the perfect income would cover your life expenses plus a comfortable cushion for luxuries/entertainment and savings, but only require you to take on professional responsibilities commensurate with that level of compensation.
In other words, everyone would be glad to have a Fortune 500 CEO's salary, but most would not be happy to accept what doing that job requires of your life (being 'on call' 24/7, having to answer to shareholders/board of directors, making decisions that you know could negatively impact hundreds or even thousands of employees for the financial good of the company, etc.).
As a rule I find most boards overstate the amount of 10's there are actually out there. I've yet to see more than a couple during my times in a club or even out in the civilian world.
And guys no matter how beautiful a woman is eventually find something wrong with them and start to look around.......think back a few years Elizabeth Hurley ( who I thought was a knockout) couldn't keep Hugh Grant's member in his pants......
As for going into the clubs I look for 2/3 prospects-- One and a spare (minimum) just in case the one I find the most attractive has a bad attitude or has been at the "profession" so long she had become mechanical in her approach.
And if it just isn't there I leave.