I was on very close terms with people who used SF RedBook.
That was far more explicit than this is, in terms of sex acts, and also because it reviewed and tracked individual providers.
But never, did LE use that to decide who to bust. Busts always came about because the neighbors complained. And when LE was at the front door, they never had RB derived info. They just had to deal with the provider f2f. I would say that usually it was entrapment.
Why?
Well for one thing, all of those shops used a two call system, and so you never could trace from the address to the ad. And booking bogus appointments, I guess there is just not probable case to do that.
And on RB they really stopped being explicit when it came to storefront AMPs, as opposed to these 2 call residential AAMPs.
The prostitution laws are controversial, and LE knows it. So usually there are either neighbor complaints, or some other types of crime going on, before they act.
Here in San Jose, homeowner groups using the Neighborhood Groups stalk street hookers, they photograph them and track their movements, and pretty much force LE's hand. So LE is usually trashing the Constitution and Due Process, and acting without evidence.
They will sometimes approach a woman at a bus stop and id her and want to see what it in her purse, and then wait until buses go by. If she is not on one of them, they bust her.
What gets a prostitution establishment busted is not the sex in the back room. Its the manner of dress and demeanor of the women out in public view.
This is why SF has better AMPs than SJ, more visual, more slutty, and hence more used to GFE, because they get less trouble from LE. And the less trouble from LE, the younger and better looking the women too.
So specifically about TUSCL and retail strip clubs, I don't think LE would use it. Not really probable cause. And if they want to find violating strip clubs, its not necessary to use TUSCL. I still though, for lots of reasons, would never mention dancer names, not even in PM's. LE can read PM's just as easily as it can read posts and articles.
Even if they hear a clear case of prostitution at a strip club, that could be just one girl. Is busting one girl really worth the effort? And given also that most of the time the cops get corrupted and become complicit?
It has to be a political decision. Patrol officers and Vice don't really on their own go after prostitution. Most of the time now, they use the "Human Trafficking" idea as justification. And almost always it is bogus. But the way the law is written, anything could be Human Trafficking, no force, fraud, coercion, or actions with juveniles required. But in Asia women are lining up to come here and do the GFE-MSOG AAMP sessions, and bank lots of money. And any trouble with the boss, they run off to another shop.
Here most LE has decided that they will not get naked in AMPs. In most AMPs, first thing the girl tells you is to take off your clothes.
And for me of course, I treat the girl like a civilian at all times. So naked or clothed, I'll move on her and make it happen with her. She doesn't have to do anything except yield. Most of the time, seeing what is happening, they will ask, "Do you want to do everything?" And then they make sure they get the money. But more and more now, in AMPs they don't ask for money, they just accept it at the end. Safer. More fun too. Probably they get more money that way.
SJG
