Noticed that, under "Listings", states are now arranged by number of SCs. I was looking for a CT club, and noticed that CT "only" had 19 clubs. Small state, but relatively large population, around 3,6 million. This works out to around 194K residents per club. Turns out that's not out of line. Did some noodling around (instead of working) and came up with CA having 272K residents per club, NY 253K, IL 267K, TX 209K.
FL and RI, two centers of the TUSCL universe, are at 140K and 137.5K RPCs, respectively. NJ is at 131K, and PA holds its own at 167K.
Somebody adept with ChatGPT could probably develop a prompt which would generate a "Residents Per Strip Club" list in 5 minutes, and some sociology grad student could come up with a unifying theory regarding the disparate ratios. Or, somebody could pull a theory out of their kiester which may be equally plausible
Replies (2)
Wasn't Rhode Island create by people saying later to the Puritans? Do we really need any more explanation of club distribution in Southern New England than that?
🔺 Somebody should do their noodle work for us & see the narrowed down residents/population numbers per city for specific clubs coz some people don't wanna drive just anywhere in a whole state when they go to a strip club, some people like the convenience of local or metropolitan driving. Income levels per city is also a good way to break it down, so strippers know the median income levels of customers. Clubs could be mislead of surrounding metropolitan cities thinking they have the same/similar resident income levels of their closer local city when they actually don't. There should be income & population numbers per specific driving miles radius of a strip club, & I would go with 30 Or 60 miles radius driving, not a whole state! ✓ 🌴 - 🏜️ - 🌴 - 🏜️ - 🚦 - 🚘 - 🚔 -
Join the conversation
Sign in to reply to this discussion.