Ethical Question
Let's suppose you knew the name and work history of a dancer who posted on here and a third party was asking you to PM them that information. Would it be okay to do so without the dancer's permission?
What are your thoughts? Seems like an obvious "no" to me.
What are your thoughts? Seems like an obvious "no" to me.
Got something to say?
Start your own discussion
57 comments
If the OP is w.r.t. something else then disregard my post.
In any event, I am a big advocate of confidentiality. If there's the slightest doubt, you should not share information. Not only is this the right thing to do, but what goes around comes around.
whoremongers discussing ethics?
:)
hmmmm. this sounds like a real dilemma. maybe the answer depends on whether alucard was in love with a tattooed lady and the only real question remaining would be which arm. oh that is unless you’re a leftard then it depends on the color of her skin
otherwise NO.
WTF....
This belongs right up there on "Things I thought I'd never see": A discussion on Ethics on a strip club website.
Just let confidences lie where they may.
Case in point - the angry d-bag that thought I was Juice or Zipperhead or whoever when I started posting! I suspect that guy isn't embarrassed to buy condoms! He just buys them along with duct tape, zip ties, and a stun gun! The he goes cruising the country in a van looking for the love of his life! :(
All I can say about guys like that is that it is seriously non-brilliant to help them track down the love of their life - so don't do it!
SJG
Now he posts to show us how upstanding and ethical he is. What bullshit.
AFAIK this deals w/ Dougster stating he had met Seattle dancer and TUSCLer Stiletto25; and Seattle TUSCLer Club_Goer; whom I believe *has* met Stilleto25; asking Dougster to prove he had met her by confirming info Club_Goer already knew about her - not asking Dougster for dancer info he (Club_Goer) didn't already know.
i.e. this is all about a dispute b/w 2 TUSCLers as to whether one of them had really met the dancer in question – IMO this is not a question/issue about private info nor ethics.
It's a long time troll manipulating an instance to try and show himself in a positive light.
https://www.tuscl.net/postread.php?PID=2…
"@Dougster- I will happily admit that I gave some handjobs some few years back working for TW. I made good money doing them as I made good money just sitting and talking with someone sometimes. "
Ooops! I'm sure you won't let facts get in the way of what you want to believe, though. Lol!
Dougster made a reasonable decision here! That isn't trolling! ;)
You then, and later, claimed she did other extras with you.
I most certainly did not. Not even once.But pull up the quote and prove me wrong. Shouldn't be too hard to find since you say I did it "repeatedly".
Also remember when you said I made up shit about Stilleto working in an extras club, and then, low-and-behold turns out she did! LOL!
I try to watch for psychos. That's why I post here where everyone is usually rational. If I want to see pyschos, I watch the evening news.
https://www.tuscl.net/postread.php?PID=1…
jestie214: " Not to mention you already said shit about stiletto working at extra clubs."
You'll notice that at that point jestie believed she would never do such a thing. So do most everyone else. But I knew differently and was willing to stick my neck out on it. How did I know? Well, because, unlike jestie I knew here IRL and had more information to go on. But jestie assumed I was lying. Wrong again jestie, because in this thread she finally admitted I was right all along:
www.tuscl.net/postread.php?PID=20504
Oh, burn, jestie! Burn!
Obviously I was substituting "shit" for "things". Again to make the point that you cared nothing about "privacy".
Again more than once, then and later, you said that Stiletto did more than she claimed. Months after she quit posting you said such.
Really Dugly, pathetic attempts to obfuscate.
As for privacy? Talk about broken logic. If I claim she did extras it harms her privacy zero. You know how many girls in Seattle did extras that time? Like 80%. Shit, I said she didn't that would harm her privacy. There is absolutely no way anyone reading that could go into the club and find who she was. Unlike if I posted her stage name. Please tell me you really aren't that dumb and this is an act on your part.
jestie: "Again more than once, then and later, you said that Stiletto did more than she claimed."
Let me see if I can explain this so simple that even you can understand it. Before that thread she had not admitted to doing any extras, so of course I was right when I said she did more than she claimed *to that point*. Only after that did she admit to doing extras and I said nothing further in that thread. I've noticed in the past you have a real problem with logic when it comes to thing that happen in sequence especially. Or you are trying to deliberately mislead and hoping nobody notices your slight of hand.
If you have some evidence that I later disagreed with that claim of hers go ahead and post the link for all to see. Your point will be proven once and for all. I've shown her how easy it is to use a search engine to find things. But I know you won't be able to find it. Because I know I never said it. But prove me wrong. Else STFU and going back to back up your claims with anything like you always have and always have been.
Too fuckin' funny!
Did I forward Alucard's real name to the board when others were asking me to? I was one of the first to get it (unsolicited) and did not.
Just keep saying stuff that makes absolutely no sense jestie but which you wish was true. Man you are one major fuckin' homo!
"Ok, I'll only say the good things. Stiletto was hot during our time together. Her dances are good. I won't say any more regarding dances, etc. because her and her psycho puppy dog will freak like they did last time."
That took about 25 seconds.
Now twist and deny and obfuscate, claim I'm saying things I'm not. Yell about "slamdunking" and once again prove what we all know about you.
Once again I've called you out on your bullshit and you claim to put me on ignore.
Really Dugly, not your best work.
...and the part where I claimed she did more extras than she claimed is where???
You do realize when I say "holding back" and don't specify exact what it could mean things besides her final revelations regarding extras, right? Like her or her coworkers attitudes about customers. Maybe other aspect of the lifestyles of her co-workers? Or it could mean how long she finally took to admit to doing extras (holding back) t and then leaving left just a couple of months after finally admitting that?
And your second quote, where I said her dances, etc. were good is another "proof" that I claimed she did more than she finally admitted regarding extras? WTF?
Really, jestie, this has always been the problem with you. Your lack of basic logical skills such that you can point to me saying her dances, etc. were good and think that means I am saying she was doing more than HJs which admitted to. Does not follow. Non sequitur. Indeed it's a pretty good proof that I did no say those things because if I was doing so "repeatedly" I would have taken the opportunity to do so that time.
Yeah, I'm very happy to let other people judges for themselves if you have prevented a single shred of evidence here that I ever claimed she did more extras than she claimed.You absolutely lost again here, jestie. Like I say I really hope you actually don't believe these "proofs" of yours are anything and it's a massive troll.