Anyone else notice Alucard's avatar 'broke' since the makeover??? I think it's symbolic of version n.0 being a failure.
Founder, please dispose of this new "click-a-thon" format.
And while you're at it, create a new section to preserve the best works written by dancers. Call it DPV for short (Dancer's Point of View). Allow the rank and file to comment to the pieces. Adding the DPV zone will give dancers a reason to stop by and motivate them to author additional content. Provide 2 free months for something which makes the DPV zone.* In turn you'll get more stimulative reading for your membership, benefit from word of mouth, and enjoy a virtuous cycle of growth. Otherwise you're fumbling away content as past quality works fade into oblivion.
[This idea is similar to bars offering half-price ladies nights to "get 'em in the door". Then the money-spending stags follow...]
Agreed Agreed Agreed... the click-a-ton SUCKS! Site format today is even worse that last night. The best idea I've seen so far is to have a m.tuscl for phones and the old format for regular computer. I don't have the fanciest smart phone in the world, but it's knows to talke the m. version of a website for phones over the standard webpage. It automatically loads the mobile version.
It looks like Founder is responding to the complaints. I just noticed that within the past hour, the search feature was restored, but it's a little different than previously. It redirects you to the Google advanced search. And, it's set up to limit your search to TUSCL. That may even be better than the former TUSCL search function. Has anyone found anything more useful with the new search feature so far?
In the years I've been here there have been many changes. Some take more getting use to than others, but for the most part, none have been a total disaster. Also, founder is pretty good about responding to requests. at least for me he has been. I can't speak for all.
Going to take a guess that many of the changes are still under wraps. The forum still works well enough for people to post rants about the new look and for others to find them and pile on. The site on the whole seems more responsive now, so that's a plus. So far there's only one change that really impacts the way I've used the site up til now, but for all I know about it it'll be different tomorrow. Since I've probably gotten more out of TUSCL than I've contributed to it, I'm opting for the wait and see approach.
If someone wants to see naked girls on live cams with the option to donate, they can already do that at myfreecams.com or a number of other web sites. I see no need to duplicate what thousands of people are already using.
Comments
last commentSite format today is even worse that last night. The best idea I've seen so far is to have a m.tuscl for phones and the old format for regular computer. I don't have the fanciest smart phone in the world, but it's knows to talke the m. version of a website for phones over the standard webpage. It automatically loads the mobile version.
The DPV idea sounds good to me as well.
That's NOT enough!!! Banish all the new changes!!
Warning: imagepng() [function.imagepng]: Unable to open '/home/httpd/vhosts/tuscl.net/pictures/4b8af5be2b7…' for writing in /home/httpd/vhosts/tuscl.net/new/classes/class.im… on line 290
In the years I've been here there have been many changes. Some take more getting use to than others, but for the most part, none have been a total disaster. Also, founder is pretty good about responding to requests. at least for me he has been. I can't speak for all.
The recent reviews is much better now. No need to search review by review looking for for those in a particular area.
I've noticed NO change at all in responsiveness.
"Since I've probably gotten more out of TUSCL than I've contributed to it......" Wall, how many reviews have you contributed to TUSCL?
We should BE so Lucky!