Comments by RonJax2 (page 5)

@PAFBAS, one observation for you about HKGC and the VIP rooms. They seem to be really pushing sex in these rooms of late. Like, as one example, the recent VIPs I did there, the meseros all offered to sell me condoms of vitamin V, that's never happened on prior trips.

I never patronize the street girls, but this is still highly disconcerting. If they come for the Paraditas are the Bar Girls next?

I mean, a Vegas club like SR sounds like what you are looking for. You could spend hours there doing $20 table dances with gorgeous women. You're gonna get upsold though, the only club in the country I can think of where you can do grindy table dances without getting upsold is the Ebony Inn in Maryland. (And there, for the low price of $10 a dance!) The bottom line is, the scene now is different than it was back in the day, for better or worse.

I hope you connect are able to connect with some other TUSCLers!

For any time travelers from the future who find this thread, the limit appears to be 64 kb.

> SD, I fly out on occasion. Any clubs you’d recommend in or around the city? I've only been clubbing once in San Diego, and it was a brief PG-13 affair, I can't say I'd recommend any club in San Diego. The scene is just that much better in Tijuana, like Krusty says it's the "Happiest Place on Earth".

I make a point when I'm club to repeat in my heads amounts I'm paying, so I can remember for reviews. Was that beer $8 or $10? What was the cover again? How much did I stage tip? What were the VIP prices and what did I tip? If you're not paying explicit attention to these things at the time, they're easy details to miss in a review.

@FoCo, lol, you may be the first to recognize my avatar. > What’s your criteria then for selecting a club when you might never be back? Yeah, when I'm in a new area, I plot my invasion with TUSCL reviews like Eisenhower invading Normandy. I scour every review, map routes to hotels and business goals, sometimes even DM locals or post threads if I need clarity. Lately though I've been traveling to San Diego with some frequency, which is excellent because Tijuana is the best SC destination in all of North America, IMHO.

Shit, that sounds awesome @PAFBABS. It's amazing the fun times you can have in la ZN if you're just a little bit picky about who you arriba with.

My local area sucks for clubs, so I club almost exclusively when traveling, which involves planning ahead. And wow, that sounds like fun with your CF, hope you have a blast. 👏

I'm late to the party, but great review @londonguy, thanks for reporting. I always enjoy reading FKK reviews, one of these days I'll see one for myself.

Sexy witch costumes. Sexy cops. Sexy teachers, students, nurses. What's not to like?

I think the causes Gates is investing in are completely worthwhile, like eradicating Malaria. Gates has done a ton to lessen human misery in the developing world. And I think the new technologies he's investing in, like the Traveling Wave Reactor, show real promise for our future prosperity. He definitely had sex with his subordinates (wasn't Melissa an employee when they started dating?) And I believe the accounts that he love strippers. But are we gonna judge him for that? I mean, if you live in a glass house....

> Right now the EC is the rule of the game. Bitching about "but we won the popular vote," it doesn't matter. Nor does how or why it started. My vote in Mass doesn't count but the rules are the rules. Yep, I agree with you here definitely. Both sides have to play the game with the rules we have. I'm glad you agree it would be worthwhile to end the EC and do the NPVIC. I think it actually could be less of an uphill battle than you think. Right now, the system isn't really protecting most small states. Like, WY, AK, SD, ND... they get ignored in presidential politics. The EC focuses the race on the battleground states. Silver bulletin currently shows PA as having a voter power index of 7.6. Your voter power index in MA is something less than 0.01, meaning a voter in PA is like 1,000x more powerful than you. It's a ludicrous system.

Also, to CJs original question, Will Trump try to steal the election again? ABSOLUTELY. He's already been laying the ground work for this, stating in multiple interviews he'll accept the '24 results if and only if he wins. And he will absolutely try all the same felonious assault on our democracy that he did in 2020 should he lose. He'll pressure officials, from local county board members up to governors to change results or decertify, as he did in 2020. He'll cook up conspiracy theory riddled lawsuits. He'll try again to establish fake electors. He'll incite stochastic terror on local election workers. He'll try again (or attempt) to send mass mobs of insurrectionists to disrupt official proceedings, both in state houses and again potentially the US Capitol. As an aside, there's a great HBO documentary out right now called Stopping the Steal. It's the story of the lengths Trump went to in 2020 to overturn the election. Notably, it's a story told only by Republicans. If he loses this election, he'll be like a caged rat. He'll be facing sentencing in his guilty felon verdict in the hush money case in NY. And he'll be facing felony trials in a GA district court for election interference, and the federal Jan 6th case. In 2020, he tried to overturn the election without consideration of the consequences, this time, threatened and cornered, I fear he could go much farther. Harris needs to be preparing not just to defeat Trump at the ballot box, but to defend her victory legally, in the court of public opinion, and to defend democracy in general. It think she can and she will.

I agree with all who have mentioned the electoral college being an outdated relic. I would go so far as to point out that there's a dark reason it exists in it's current form: it was shaped to protect the institution of slavery. https://time.com/4558510/electoral-college-history-slavery/ And @puddytat, you are absolutely right to point out that the worm turns here. To liberals, the EC feels disastrous right now, because Trump won the EC and lost the popular vote in 2016. And this year, it also heavily advantages Trump. Nate Silver's model currently shows a 77% chance that Kamala wins the popular vote, but only a 56% chance she wins the EC, leaving a whopping 21% chance that Trump repeats 2016 by winning the election while losing the popular vote. But that bias can change. In 2008 and 2012 it favored democrats: https://centerforpolitics.org/crystalball/a-brief-history-of-electoral-college-bias/ Both parties, IMHO, should want us to be rid of the EC, for the uncertainty, arbitrariness it injects. And for the fact that it disenfranchises so many voters. If you're a Trump voter in NY and CA right now, your vote doesn't mean shit.

IMHO, the problem isn't that it's 5/8. The problem is that rejections aren't anonymous. I often find myself hesitant to reject reviews that I think are still going to be published anyway, because then you wind up being the one asshole who pissed on a guy's review that got published. Often I'll just skip voting on a marginal review for this reason. Also, given founder has experimented with the site for 3 decades now makes me think there's reasons not to make any changes.

No one's commented on the fact that these women are all quite attractive. This dude lived a good life, lol. Either way, I agree with @wallanon and @grrlgonebad that there are numerous reasons discretion is important and valuable in this hobby. One thing no one has commented on here is the privacy of the women involved here. They might well not have wanted to be part of these shenanigans, and it does appear like they gave their consent for their images to be used in this way.

Oh, and one thing I forgot to mention in the review itself: I change chicas names as a manner of course in all my reviews, for their privacy. If anyone wants to find "Isabel" I'm happy to share her real stage name via DM, provided you have some history here. (And damn, I'm still kicking myself for not getting her WhatsApp. What a stupid and petty mistake!)

Thanks for the kind words all. Especially the comparison to HST from @sfrsox! That made my day, the good doctor is one of my all time favorite authors, and I definitely think that "gonzo journalism" is an exceedingly appropriate style for strip club reviews. Reject the idea that a review can be objective, and embrace the idea that you're seeing it through the eyes of the biased, drug addled, sex addicted writer.

Nice review PAFBABs! I'll second Rod's suggestion that I would love to hear more about what "no restrictions" meant in your encounter. I read this and I thought of anal too. That's like, a bucket list item for me in the Zona. Never pulled it off (though TBH I haven't really tried that hard either.) Also good protip on tipping meseros well. I tend to tip everyone well but the meseros, whom I usually just do a buck a drink for, or $10 for a VIP room. But a little more would probably go a long way.

I've just emailed it to you. Thanks for looking into it

^ I agree. I think traveling in groups is how any kind of human migration works. Like, the guys from University of Florida who all move out to LA together. People migrate to where they have friends and a network. As for DC, I would just give it time.

Drug riddled orgies aren't crimes. What P. Diddy did, allegedly, involves trafficking and rape. I have a low opinion of Musk and a high opinion of Gates, but in either case, barring some tangible evidence of an actual crime, I see no reason for them to be investigated.

I tried in a different browser that failed too. It looks like there's two failures here. One is a 500 error "aborted" on the HTTP Post, the other the Javascript error I mentioned previously. I could split the review into chunks, but that would be difficult, it reads much better as an atomic review I think.