Comments by funonthaside (page 12)

You never know when you'll encounter a stalker or someone attempting to engage in blackmail. So yes....lie lie lie.

I'll never understand the "won't get naked if there aren't a lot of customers there" mindset. One customer could tip more than 5 customers. You never know, at least with guys you haven't seen before, which type of guy is at the tip rail. You've helped confirm the laziness of the Lust girls. Not really new information....but solidifies my view that Lust is to be avoided. The girls have more to lose by not getting naked, than the guys have to lose by not seeing pussy. Yet, there are girls who seem to think they are in a position of power by staying clothed. It's the opposite, honey.

You've made my point for me, Rick....the club owner can gouge away, as he has limited competition. As far as owning a $800k home on a $100k salary, I'm interested in knowing which financial advisor you consult.

Barring a group of lesbians, who the fck has a female birthday party (or invites females to a guy's birthday party) at PO? And, you expect solid customer service at (a) a strip club or (b) a ratchet hood club with known questionable activities? I'm a fan of PO, btw...I'm just reasonable enough to know to not create drama in that club. And "professional" doesn't belong in a PO review, or be expected, unless on is referring to the dancers excelling in their chosen craft.

Even a ghetto industrial property in DC suburbs is not cheap. And, a club comes with legal fees and various other legal expenses. Furthermore, pulling down $200k in DC suburbs is not flex territory. A club owner can (and should) charge whatever he wants to customer and dancers. It's up to dancers and customers to stop patronizing / working at clubs with excessive fees. But, it's not like there are currently a plethora of good (or any) clubs in the DMV. So, unless/until someone enters the market with a profitable strip club which more fairly allows dancers to make money, the club's owner should benefit from doing what others have been unable to provide.

I'm not aware of any bans, but I heard a story about a guy dashing after getting some dances with a girl. I imagine if he returned, he would be rejected or beaten senseless. The concept of girls "sticking it to the man" by refusing to dance (and foregoing cash) due to what a guy did to some other girl, is comical. Particularly at EI, there are enough ratchet girls there that they actually get off on going against the grain by dancing with guys others don't like. I suppose the only way to know if YOU would be banned from entry is to try.

Ummm....so.....they will fuck a guy in exchange for money, and that's fine.....BUT....go 1 minute over the agreed-upon hour, and suddenly she's wearing a scarlett letter around town? You really have an odd obsession with girls and their handlers.

Good thing LE is stupid....they will NEVER be able to associate a Billy Joel song with your activities. And, by referencing the artist, you avoided the "too explicit" stamp. Well done.

PH is a good place to hang out and drink, and to watch stage shows....not good beyond that.

People are more concerned about not getting their feel-feels hurt by words, than their freedoms and money being taken.

But wouldn't NOT having a young Latina on speed dial be a better financial decision?

I'm curious what you know to conclude that the end is near. People have been predicting the demise of EI for many years, yet it has continued to exist. I would not at all be surprised if it were shuttered someday, though.

^ was probably a gum job. This place makes Playhouse Lounge seem like it's filled with college co-eds.

That works only if the girl performs as expected. While I agreee that test dances cost money, and a good LD does not guarantee a good VIP, I've had enough weak LDs over time to be glad I didn't dive into VIP sessions with girls. Just as stage shows are a test for LDs, LDs are tests for VIP. Or, at least get some barside chat/playtime before heading to VIP.

As long as you're okay paying $xx for an experience, it's between the club and the girl how the funds are distributed. If they don't like how the club is run, they work elsewhere. There was once a guy who ran multiple clubs, and the girls were notoriously miserable. It was because the owner took a large cut of thru earnings. Their solution was to demand a matching tip for LDs, which resulted in those clubs not being among the top choices for PLs. An issue such as the Showcase ultimately fixes itself. For example, I've been to Showcase only twice, and while I enjoy the stage show method there, I avoided LDs because of the $20 + $40 model. Eventually the girls get tired of being told "no", and they go elsewhere, at least to the extent that they can.

Now the problem has gotten worse, as everyone will be flocking to AW to see the latest talent.

Using rick's logic, law firm partners are pimps. And you think an OTC girl isn't giving some/all of her earnings to a handler? One point I take away from this post, though, which isn't really new information, is that over the years, I have avoided clubs where the clubs take what I feel are excessive cuts of dancer earnings. What's "excessive"? It's subjective and relative. The same applies to girls that I know have traditional pimps.m As far as the owner tracking times via computer logging and cameras.....would YOU trust the girls to report 100% of their LD time? Just as clubs provide a place for PLs to view a buffet of girls, clubs provide a safe venue for the girls to ply their trade. Club owners deserve to be paid for providing that service.

If clubs care about raising dancer income, they would lower their cuts of house fees. I think we're all smart enough to know the price increases are designed to increase club income (except it backfires when customers find better-value alternatives to those clubs).

I love when they ask how many songs you plan to do, so they may pace themselves to bring you to a finish as your song count is reached. It's the PHL version of mutual climax.

10 songs with Tatiana? Did you at least make a profit when you sold your beach house to fund that experience?

....and go during dayshift, when it's mostly the reliable OGs. You should have known when you saw a "model-pretty blond" at a place known for ladies who some refer to as "elderly" that it would be subpar. One lesson...don't treat PHL the same as other clubs. Here, older is best. If one wants young and hot, it's best to to elsewhere, as it's the young/hot ones at PHL who are the bad ones.

Trump attended the event; Kamala couldn't be bothered to attend. She plays the black card, yet can't grace black reporters with her presence. And, the reporters were on CPT, yet Trump patiently waited 30 minutes for them to start. Then, the reporter began with her hostile line of questioning. But it's TRUMP who is the a'hole?

Whales come and go. The whale money is good short-term, but he will move on to another girl at some point, and the stable guys (not whales, but good for $x each visit) will remember they were pushed off a cliff when the whale walked in. Of course, we've all benefitted from being a girl's go-to guy, getting attention whenever we wanted it, so it's a complex issue. But, girls should be a bit strategic about how they handle situations.

Keep things on a positive directory? She's turning tricks on The Block. Let's not fool ourselves into thinking any of the girls on The Block are innocent little Princesses who will someday be philanthropists or successful CEOs. If she were as pristine and level-headed as you present, she would dance at a club a bit less over the top than the Block clubs. I've watched enough girls over the years erode from the Block's grip and lifestyle to know that it's a trap.

Guys' drinks are closer to $10 for beer..not $25.