discussion comment
5 years ago
"Nicole + CC99.... They can discuss data and statistics....and create their own little world where Nicole cuddles with CC99 and he talks to her about law school rankings and they compare grades LMFAO"
I've thought before that me and Nicole are a good match in several ways actually.
discussion comment
5 years ago
![]()
CC99Say yes to the sex industry!
"I'd call it more 'saccharine' than 'cute', but whatever."
Saccharine can be cute though.
discussion comment
5 years ago
![]()
CC99Say yes to the sex industry!
Normally I should find an ally in feminists and I have wanted to see them as allies before.
- I do think sexual assault/harassment is a major problem and have sympathy for people trying to fix it.
- I do have issues with the prevalence of degrading content in porn.
- I also want to dismantle power dynamics in relationships.
- I also don't like the expectation that men be macho. I'm not macho and quite frankly, a lot of macho behaviors just look like being a dick to me.
Feminism lost me as an ally though because they appear to have just become a movement dedicated to hating men. Everything a guy says or does or feels gets demonized by feminists in some way as sexist.
Say you want a cute girly girlfriend? Feminists will say "you're looking for somebody weak to dominate."
Say you want a girl to emotionally nurture you? Feminists will say "so you just want a girl who will rescue you and act like your mommy."
Even when you do things that they should like, like saying you try to be gentle with girls and not push them into sex. They just say something like "you're treating girls like a child, who's so delicate you can't disgrace her with your sexuality."
Man wants to show a lot of affection to his girlfriend and call her cute and stuff like that? Feminists will say you are infantilizing her.
Every fucking thing you do is perceived by feminists as evil. They always assume you have some kind of malicious intent, or despite talking about how guys should support feminism because feminism will eliminate the burden of being macho and unemotional, feminists are just as bad about ridiculing or making fun of any kind of male vulnerability. They're so obsessed with women's independence from men that they are ruining the entire idea of what a romantic relationship should really be like. Instead of two souls coming together to be one person where all her problems are your problems and all her wants and goals are yours, and her feel the same way about you; instead feminists seem to be subtly trying to push this idea that romantic relationships should happen somewhat at an arms length and men and women should ultimately be independent of each other. To force this to happen, they celebrate women cheating on and divorcing their husbands. For some reason, a man and a woman becoming extremely attached to and loving towards one another really bothers them and they constantly try to figure out what negative things they can say about it. Either the man is a patriarchal sexist or the woman is a bad feminist letting down all her "sisters" or whatever by being so "submissive" when she isn't even being submissive she's just being loving.
Also, feminism is terrible at achieving their actual goals. Sexual assault is probably a worse problem now because feminism was so determined to destroy the code of chivalry and because they rant against "nice guys" even more than they do against guys who act like cavemen and are committing sexual assaults all the time. Feminism has destroyed the harmony between the sexes by telling men their natural affection for girls was sexist and that girls' shouldn't have a natural affection for guys because most guys are potential rapists and sexists. For as much as they rant against 1950s America, I didn't see any misogynistic movements in the 1950s and most men were actually very kind and loving towards their wives. Feminism has ruined all of that, now we're slowly hating each other more and more because feminism has taught both genders to see the other as the enemy instead of as a source of love and joy in their lives.
discussion comment
5 years ago
I was wondering that myself given that it comes up somewhat often. I've never had it happen to me though.
discussion comment
5 years ago
This thread title with that avatar had me freaking out for a second there lol.
discussion comment
5 years ago
^This man gets it.
discussion comment
5 years ago
![]()
CC99Say yes to the sex industry!
I didn't say I prefer flat-chested girls myself. I can enjoy the uniqueness of both. A girl pushing your face into her boobs is really nice though. But I thought that was a really cute statement.
discussion comment
5 years ago
"Girls in revealing clothes or hot girls, are a dime a dozen."
Doesn't mean anything.
discussion comment
5 years ago
![]()
CC99Say yes to the sex industry!
^Stop acting like a squawking Tumblr ranting feminist.
discussion comment
5 years ago
![]()
CC99Say yes to the sex industry!
^Wow that was really lame.
discussion comment
5 years ago
![]()
IceyI put your ATF on a winning team
I used to be all about experiences and living life and shit in high school and first half of college. Then I realized this world is fucked.
The world doesn't want to create conditions that I can thrive in so I'm going to create my own world where I can thrive in.
Why live in reality when you can create something better?
discussion comment
5 years ago
![]()
IceyI put your ATF on a winning team
Totally @Nicole. Live it up! You're young and have no worries. All that crushing debt can be dealt with by the government who is gonna give us all free college!
Disclaimer: above post is highly sarcastic.
discussion comment
5 years ago
Yeah if you sagged your pants at my school you'd be guilty of a dress code violation. Most of the guys at my school though didn't do an obvious sag, your shirt covers it up so they never really got in trouble for it. A lot of the girls' complained though that they said the dress codes were sexist because it was usually girls who got in trouble for it. At my school at least though, girls were the primary violators of it so it kind of made sense. I think their argument would hold more merit if they claimed that the dress codes suppress their freedom of self-expression though because the "sexist" card really gets overplayed a lot and people lose their sympathy for anyone claiming it like the boy who cried wolf.
Teenagers, as far as I am concerned, have the same right to self-expression that adults do. That's why I feel uncomfortable with an actual mandated policy. But at the same time I can understand why the policy is in place, its not senseless or sexist. It just happens that at my school, girls were a lot more likely to wear distracting clothing than the guys were. I can see how in some schools that might not be the case though. From what I see, if enough people break the rules of any kind of social institution, the social institution adapts by turning a blind eye to minor violations. So if you have a school full of guys sagging their pants, the school doesn't want to punish everybody so they only punish the worst offenders. If the girls at this same school are not frequently wearing provocative clothing then a girl who does wear provocative clothing is going to stand out and get suspended for it, upon which she might think the school is sexist because of all the guys walking around sagging their pants. The real cause, however, is just that most of the girls around her are following the rules so she stood out whereas most of the guys were breaking them so minor offenses don't stand out.
At my school it worked the opposite way. A guy seen sagging his pants was instantly noticeable and suspended. With the girls though, because so many of them wore slightly provocative clothing, girls who did that didn't stand out or were noticeable despite technically breaking the policy, the school could only punish the girls who wore extremely provocative clothing. I was surprised sometimes though to see that certain girls got punished for wearing something just as provocative as what another girl who didn't get punished wore. So to me, it seemed like the rules could get selectively enforced based on how the teacher was feeling that day.
discussion comment
5 years ago
![]()
IceyI put your ATF on a winning team
@Gawker
Its like a state of safety and well being, it can also mean when applied to a person that they are a good person.
discussion comment
5 years ago
![]()
CC99Say yes to the sex industry!
I like her content when I understand it. As I said, I do understand the majority of her posts, but there's a lot of incoherent posts. Enough that it is noteworthy.
discussion comment
5 years ago
Oh those feel amazing.
discussion comment
5 years ago
![]()
IceyI put your ATF on a winning team
@Pistola dumbass I've seen South Park.
Girls are having a lot of sex. But girls are fucking each other like never before. It makes sense that there's a huge deficit on the male side because guys don't want to fuck each other, even if they are desperate. For most guys, no matter how desperate they are, other guys are not an option. Girls have sex with each other all the time though and they don't need to be desperate to want sex from another girl. This means a huge portion of the female libido is being satisfied by other females. The majority of sex is still heterosexual but there's enough girl on girl sex going on that lots of men are unable to be sexually satisfied.
If you have a girlfriend and are in a monogamous relationship, you should be able to find sexual satisfaction. But being single for most guys means sexual destitution.
discussion comment
5 years ago
And the amount of porn I've watched is the minority compared to how much fantasizing I've done. Most of the time I jerk off, I just use my imagination. I specifically have a 1 in 4 rule. That the ratio of porn faps to imagination faps has to be 1:4.
discussion comment
5 years ago
@Icey I think you know what its like to be a man with a low sex drive. I can't comment on this any further because our brains were clearly wired very differently. I just can't understand guys who look at a girl's body and aren't highly aroused by it unless they told me they were gay. A girl's body will always be very sexually stimulating to me, that's despite having exposed myself through the internet to girls who are only partially clothed and jerking off to it pretty much every day for more than 8 years as well as having seen god knows how many girls in skimpy outfits throughout my life. It doesn't stimulate me sexually quite as much as it did when I was 14, but I am far from being "desensitized" to it and I wouldn't say a whole lot has changed since I was 14 in that regard.
discussion comment
5 years ago
"Damn straight! And that's how I have fun. I keep it simple. It doesn't interfere with the rest of my life. And it's fun for me."
Exactly, "escapism" is not a bad thing. A lot of times, the best parts of our lives are about escapism.
discussion comment
5 years ago
![]()
IceyI put your ATF on a winning team
Sometimes you spend your whole life being sheltered and desperately want to break out and start "living it up." When you do finally break out and start "living it up" though, you realize how dangerous and tough the world actually is, and you realize that there was a reason you were sheltered all your life and you want to go back to a sheltered, wholesome existence.
I've had enough experiences to know that I really don't like the way a lot of the world is. Unfortunately, I don't have as much power to change it as I would like, so I'd prefer to create my own.
discussion comment
5 years ago
![]()
IceyI put your ATF on a winning team
Its not really. Most men who've had harems past and present have had a favorite girl in the harem too, doesn't make it not a harem.
discussion comment
5 years ago
![]()
CC99Say yes to the sex industry!
^I agree with Nidan, this is not "an attack thread." UprightCitizen even put me on ignore for essentially not being negative enough.
Content wise, I like a fair number of Nicole's threads and would like her to stay on TUSCL. Although I do wish she'd participate more in other people's threads instead of sticking so exclusively to her own. But seriously Nicole, your grammar needs some work. I think your experience posting on TUSCL would be a lot more enjoyable if people could understand what you are actually saying more often and you don't need to constantly clarify what you meant in follow up posts.
discussion comment
5 years ago
![]()
IceyI put your ATF on a winning team
"And having a main bitch and side bitches isn't on your list."
Falls under polygamous (harem) section.
discussion comment
5 years ago
^No it wouldn't.