Is Nicole's grammar difficult to understand sometimes?

She speaks Soy Boy Beta Cuck. I cant do understand her, you do.

Who?

Probably she is posting via a cell phone, and so she has to be terse.

SJG

Terse?!?? Have you read her posts????

She's often incoherent. I suspect that she uses it as cover for the inability to make a good argument.

It's not us. It's her.

I agree 100% with Icey.

SJG

I'm sure nicole has a glass or 3 of wine while on this...

What a dumbass troll question. Nobody can be that clueless

How is this a troll question.

I'm trying to see if there's any reasonable debate on this or whether there's a very solid consensus that her grammar needs improvement.

A troll asking for a debate on a empirically obvious challenged poster. You are one post away from ignore...

Oh c'mon upright citizen stop being so dramatic. I worded this specifically so as to be fair and keep my mind open to the possibility that I might be wrong. Wanting to be fair doesn't make me a troll. Besides, I actually agreed that her grammar is often incoherent and needs to be fixed. I created the thread because Icey claimed that the majority of the forum doesn't think its difficult to comprehend so I'm asking the whole forum and not just people who happen to be reading one of her threads whether her grammar really is difficult to understand.

She's average to above average for an online poster. I do hope her college papers are better thought out. But I know PhDs that use "ur" when they text so who knows?

^That's an interesting perspective but by average to above average, are you talking about the content of her posts or her grammar?

I actually often do enjoy the content of some of her threads. Some of her threads seem kind of Twitter-like to me and I ignore them but there are also several times when she posts thought-provoking content. Its the grammar structure specifically that I occasionally find incoherent which detracts from the overall quality of her threads.

Let's all psycho analyze my grammar now and make an entire post for it...

Congrats you just made the list...

If this is an attack its a pretty tame one. I imagine Nicole finds the thread funny anyway.

@ Nicole. I think they did. And the verdict is that you need some work. The real question is whether or not you can take constructive criticism. My guess is that you cannot. Prove me wrong.

^I agree with Nidan, this is not "an attack thread." UprightCitizen even put me on ignore for essentially not being negative enough.

Content wise, I like a fair number of Nicole's threads and would like her to stay on TUSCL. Although I do wish she'd participate more in other people's threads instead of sticking so exclusively to her own. But seriously Nicole, your grammar needs some work. I think your experience posting on TUSCL would be a lot more enjoyable if people could understand what you are actually saying more often and you don't need to constantly clarify what you meant in follow up posts.

I've never met her grammer so I don't know.

CC99 said "Content wise, I like a fair number of Nicole's threads and would like her to stay on TUSCL."

If you even remotely believe that she's quitting TUSCL, then you should have your picture placed next to the word 'gullible' in the dictionary.

Her crap posting style is just a function of her trolling. At least that's my opinion. Asking her to improve is an empty ask.

I like her content when I understand it. As I said, I do understand the majority of her posts, but there's a lot of incoherent posts. Enough that it is noteworthy.

I'm hungry someone buy me food

Thx