Comments by BoringLoser (page 15)

No I just said that because the guy that approved the review called you guys pussies

Jk. Why is the guy who approved it getting so agitated?

First of all, you guys are being pussies. He actually put some time into writing that review, which is why it’s pretty accurate.

You should probably look into getting penis reduction surgery. Or at least invest in a wheelbarrow to haul around that monster schlong you’re packing.

It doesn’t work if you don’t drink the whole bottle though

Funny thing. The guy we were talking about made an interesting post in the front room. https://www.tuscl.net/app/discussion.php5?id=63424

Lol, maybe papi is jaded, but that doesn’t make him wrong. Not that I would really know. I’m still new to this.

Sorry I guess I just forgot what I was looking for when I noticed that every single follies review says it had 11 comments (and I scrolled all the way back to 2015). I see the HK review now and it does show 116 comments with only 7 actual comments

I’ve seen clubs where the toilet was literally right next to the sink. If I had written a review I would have been tempted to mention that. Probably would have left the urinals part out though

I couldn’t find the review you’re talking about because or me every follys review has 11 comments. I think it’s a bug.

Not a fan. Never thought to get her to take them out. I can think of a few that I might try that on.

I thought there was something new on this post but the last comment was from an hour ago

Yeah but the dick pic would have a sign that says: tuscl.net twentyfive 4692690

I figured it was an extension of the ITC hustle. I just got confused when she wouldn’t let me pay. I was fully expecting to pay for both of us, but she actually paid for me. She’s not my CF at that club, and I’m not looking to change that. I guess it’s possible that my CF has heard about this by now. Maybe she’s looking to stir up some drama.

Ok, so back to the daddy subject. One girl says this. The first time I ignored it. The second time I looked at her and asked what she said. There has not been a third time. It seems like it must be something she has success with because she acted surprised at my response. I appreciate that she remembered not to use it on me. The first time it wasn’t really a mood killer. The second time it was just a minor distraction since I felt like I needed to put a stop to it before it became a common thing. I’ll have to think of what I’ll do if she does it again. I would assume it was an accident, and wouldn’t want to let it get in the way of a good time.

Someone recently described the hottest of the hot as wavemakers. You know they’re headed your way because from across the room you see the wave of heads turning to stare. Not sure if that’s what you’re thinking of.

Unless he was offering valuable insight on that many posts in a row. I don’t actually know what his comments were so please correct me if I’m wrong.

Icey just demonstrated why i think more people should have him on ignore. There’s a difference between beign a jerk sometimes and deliberately spamming the board.

Maybe just wait for a night when Chastity isn’t working

DC, I can’t help if you feel attacked when I tell you why I think you’re wrong about something. I also can’t do anything about the fact that you can’t accept that people don’t always agree with you. The only reason I treated you the way I did in this thread is because I was not interested in the never ending back and forth that comes with discussing internet troll activity. I made my point and was done talking about it. If you’re going to make sweeping generalizations based on limited data, don’t be surprised when you get questioned. Toughen up a little, and learn to be less annoying. Then people might start to like you more.

DC, continuing your argument doesn’t make it not suck. And it definitely doesn’t change the fact that I won. End of conversation.

DC, I already won when I said “VIP rules and front room drools, dummy” so stop trying to derail the conversation.

@501 yeah that’s a simpler way. Accountability.

DC, you act like there are constant flame wars here but what you listed were for the most part isolated incidents. I’m not counting icey or trap troll activity against VIP. To me they don’t seem to actually be trying to contribute to the VIP community. Side note for anyone who doesn’t have them on ignore: it’s worth it. And then when you talk about the front room you act like nothing ever happens by lumping a whole bunch of ongoing bullshit into one category. VIP rules and front room drools, dummy

Requiring multiple approvals before a review gets posted has been suggested before. In order for that to work there would probably have to be a lot more people actually looking at the reviews. Making it part of maintaining VIP would help. Maybe writing a review would get you 1-2 weeks of access and then you can earn the other two weeks by voting on reviews before you have to write another review.