Taking Down a Review
Warrior15
Anywhere there are Titties.
There is a new Review today for the Tropical Lei club in California.
https://www.tuscl.net/listing-reviews.ph…
The Review is basically a Review of a stripper there, not really a Review of the club. Also, the Review is very explicitly describing some EXTRA activities. A few of us have made comments on the Review.
Should this Review be taken down ?
https://www.tuscl.net/listing-reviews.ph…
The Review is basically a Review of a stripper there, not really a Review of the club. Also, the Review is very explicitly describing some EXTRA activities. A few of us have made comments on the Review.
Should this Review be taken down ?
Got something to say?
Start your own discussion
50 comments
I have gotten to the point of rejecting any review with names
A club or city may go for years being incredibly permissive with "no one caring", but it can change quickly.
That review is dumb.
On the other hand if founder is working on some new thing for " verified " dancers and members to be able to "connect" (meet OTC) that could potentially run afoul of FOSTA.
That said they are both being #1 assholes in how they are reacting to the "feedback" from others. I gave him some pretty evenhanded feedback. I'll see if he pounces on me too.
Thinking that FOSTA exists in a narrow scope of enforcement is overly optimistic.
In contrast RICO does not infringe on any fundamental rights and is well within the government's police powers and right to regulate interstate commerce.
Last I read it was best of five.
I can appreciate the need for some discretion. However, I feel reviewing dancers is an important function of the site. I travel a lot. Through this site I knew specific dancers to look for the first time I went to HiLiter or Blue Moon in Phoenix. I knew who reasonably provide the type of dance I was looking for when I went to Detroit. Not every club is like Tropical Lei or Diamond Dolls in Pompano were virtually everyone is DTF. So thinning the herd through a positive dancer review is meaningful to me. I don't know where that fine line of discretion vs details lies. Pretty sure Billy Joel for $.1/2 roses isn't fooling anyone.
Anyone who auto rejects names is not helpful to many (maybe even most) users here IMHO...
At what point will people get frustrated and stop submitting reviews ?
Probably never so long as the incentive is a free month of access to the reviews. It took too long under the old system for reviews to get published, which is why it went to the vote system. The things people object to really aren't that big of a deal. And they're obvious.
Just because "Amber" sucked customer Bozo's cock bareback doesn't mean he needs to tell the world about it. If some guys just can't help but overshare, then that's on them, but there's probably lots of other guys who would mind if "Amber" has to move on because it's now too public that the management is looking the other way on her. Maybe not all the managers are as permissive, and "Amber" only dances when "Don Pablo" is managing because she can suck n' fuck and he doesn't care so long as he gets his cut. Then Bozo just burned "Amber" and "Don Pablo", and maybe they both go. Maybe all the manager's are letting things go but the owner doesn't know. Lot's of shit goes sideways when info is too easy to come by. This site has PMs for a reason.
For me, I tend to think I'm fairly lax on what I approve for reviews. If it looks like someone put in a decent effort and the review looks legit, then it gets a pass from me. If a review has zero information, is obviously fake, or would get a dancer I'd like burned from a club I'd like, then no.
The only detail anybody is griping about is tying names to extras. And also of writing reviews that are so generic it could be about many other clubs.
In one of the review comments, somebody mentioned that even putting in asterisks+a physical description was enough to out somebody. I agree with that person. I’ve read a club review where somebody did that once and I knew who the reviewer was talking about.
———
Plus, from an individual’s self-interest perspective: if/when more dancers appear on the site, it would be very much in one’s interest to not only choose to avoid names, but also go after those who do.
Anyone notice how much strippercutie’s $250 FS claims easily baited several of us dancers (including me).
https://www.tuscl.net/app/discussion.php…
Yes this site may be more friendly about different types of sex work than, say, stripperweb. But there is still a certain taboo. And if one wants to attract more of the type of dancers people here would consider “fun”, then discretion would be a very good idea.
Meanwhile, I could speculate that a lot of these gals that may object to having their names pointed out in reviews, these are the same ones shoving dildos up their coochies on webcams.
Idk, this thread seems like its attacking some guy who was just trying to be informative.