Comments by BurlingtonHoFactory

@flagooner, Racism and racist violence are not the same thing. If you can't tell the difference then you're just another snowflake.

@flagooner, Listen commie, if you don't think of something more funny and creative to say soon I'm going to put you on Ignore. That's the one thing that every internet troll fears most

Racist violence is very rare today compared to a hundred years ago. But that doesn't mean that racism is gone. flagooner is just a typical liberal who thinks that words and thoughts are the same as actions.

This thread isn't about anyone's personal racial or hair-color preferences. She's asking if men's preferences will change as the racial makeup of the country changes; or if men will simply spend less as the country gets browner (because there won't be as many blondes available, etc). Obviously not everyone prefers blondes. But considering that natural blondes make up such a tiny fraction of the adult population, they seem to be disproportionately popular. Look at Playboy magazine, which at one time was as good a proxy for men's sexual preferences as any other outlet. Back in the day, probably 4 out of 5 Playboy Playmates were blonde, whether natural or otherwise. I'm sure there was a reason for this. And I really don't think the reason was that Playboy was a "racist" publication. (Of course, Playboy doesn't even have nudity anymore, so the times have changed, but the observation is still valid.)

I don't think I agree with NJBalla: there are plenty of blonde white girls in NJ clubs. But the closer you get to NYC, the more likely they are to be dye-jobs. The further south and west you travel, the more likely you'll find a few natural blondes, here and there, probably because of the German and Polish influence (more common in PA and Delaware). I think men tend to like blondes because blonde hair makes women look younger. That's my theory for why probably 40 or 50% of men are attracted to blondes even though natural blondes only make up, at most, 5 or 10 percent of the American and European populations. I can't think of any other explanation.

^ LOL. That's really not very creative

^ Sorry, I meant I'm fine with the last two but not with the first. Pussy and ass is fine, but not food.

Honestly? I'm fine with the first two but not the third. I won't eat food at a strip club unless it's a really high-class Zagat-rated joint. Otherwise it's just skeevy to have a meal at a strip club. What can I say? I never claimed to be rational or consistent.

I'm surprised it starts this early. I would think September or October. What kind of girl wants to fuck some middle-aged slob for money when she's still trying to figure out where her dorm is? Don't they need to get settled in first?

Putting strip clubs aside for the moment, I prefer the vibe down in AC. It's a mix of luxury and filthiness that just appeals to me. And it's not very sophisticated. Having said that, the strip club scene in both of these places is really not good. If forced to choose, I'll take the AC clubs over the NYC clubs. But as others have said, it's different for customers than it is for dancers. I'm sure you'll make money in either place. Especially now in AC, because it's still tourist season for the next five weeks or so. I think the most important consideration is whether or not you have a car. It's a major pain in the ass to drive and park in Manhattan. By comparison, technically, the streets in Atlantic City are walkable and you can even take public transportation if you're really desperate, but if you value your safety you should probably make sure that you have a car. Unless of course you're planning to work the streets for extra cash ;)

I actually always pictured flagooner to look like an old version of Higgins from Magnum PI. But he's probably more like a geriatric version of Captain Kirk from Star Trek. Makes sense because Kirk fucked a green alien that one time, and flagooner married an (illegal) alien and helped her raise an anchor-baby who's about to go off to college.

I used to love that show when I was a kid. The guy lived in someone else's huge house on the beach in paradise, no expenses, worked whenever he felt like it, drove a fancy car, always managed to find a hot chick, etc. It's a better male fantasy than James Bond ever was. And I'm not surprised that they're remaking it now - it's appropriate for the times we live in. After all, Thomas Magnum lived a life similar to that of a millennial who has moved back to his parents' house after college.

Pussy

@RandomMember, This is true, but of course flagooner wasn't always so old. You see, what happened was... Dougster actually invented a time machine and he let me use it. (That's how he knew to buy Bitcoin in advance.) And that's how we were all able to go back in time - over a century and a half - to run a gangbang on flagooner's mom. We should have let you in on it, too. In fact, in this alternate timeline we created, I think Trucidos is technically flagooner's dad. Someone should probably tell him about it.

I stopped thinking about STDs when I fucked flagooner's mom. The price was right.

You would prefer to work with an actual Marxist like AMLO rather than a standard-issue post-war liberal like Trudeau? I guess we can mark the calendars. 2016 was the year that the American conservative movement decided that every American should have a constitutional right to a high-wage manufacturing job.

@flagooner, Well, your wife is a prostitute who married you for citizenship. And your son is a gay anchor-baby with HIV. Furthermore, you're a moron. Nicole communicates with barely readable sentences, and yet speaking with her is still more productive than speaking with you.

^ Sorry, what I mean is there are several people named Harry Brown, I think. Which one said this?

@nicespice, I totally agree with that quote. Which Harry Brown said it exactly?

Honestly, protests are almost always a stupid waste of time. They're annoying and obnoxious. Nothing makes me tune something out faster than when I hear that someone is trying to "raise awareness." Even when it's something I agree with (like the Tea Party protests), it still comes across like just a lot of noise. But still, people have the right to do it, as long as they don't harm anyone. The people in this video should have been arrested, as soon as they began blocking traffic. These were so-called Resistance protesters, during Trump's inauguration, and they're mostly leftovers from the Occupy movement.

@JohnSmith69, I doubt it. Every day I read another story about a cop shooting or beating an unarmed suspect. And very few cops ever see the inside of a prison cell. Also, the cops in Ohio clearly weren't afraid of the media coverage when they arrested Stormy Daniels, for example. So I don't agree that the cops are too afraid to do their jobs. In my opinion, these protesters aren't arrested because people (and even policy makers) in America don't understand the legal definition of freedom of speech. They think it means the right to make noise and to say whatever they want without repercussions. But that's not what it means.

1) I think FKKs would still exist in Germany even without all the cheap Eastern Euro girls, but it would be much more expensive and there would be fewer providers. 2) I’m a hardcore atheist, but I don’t agree with those people who seem to want to blame religion for every little thing they happen to dislike. Historically, Catholicism and Islam are even less sexually permissive than Protestantism… and yet Catholic Mexico and Brazil have legalized prostitution, as does most of Latin America. Also, prostitution is legal in atheist Cuba, but illegal in atheist China. And prostitution is legal in Muslim Lebanon, Tunisia, Algeria, and Turkey, but illegal in Muslim Syria and Jordan. Clearly this isn’t about religion. Perhaps you can make the case that it's not about religious belief, per se, but rather about organized religion. In other words, people who believe but who don't go to church regularly might be less likely to want prostitution outlawed. I don't really know. It still seems like a weak connection to me. 3) I’m not convinced that prostitution is illegal in America solely because we, as mongers, tend to speak poorly of sex workers and slutty women in general. I'm sure it doesn't help, but that's not the reason. There is no country that I know of where little girls dream of growing up to be a sex worker. There is no country that I know of where people bring their local brothel-worker to Career Day at schools. And yet many countries have legalized sex work, despite the social stigma. Also, consider this: we now have legalized weed in many States… and yet no one in history has ever said a kind word about drug dealers or drug users. This is a much more complicated phenomenon. As I’ve said in the past, we have some quirks in our political system here in the States that makes it difficult to make prostitution legal again.

I don't think human nature is any different in the US than it is in any of the countries where prostitution is legal. People are people, no matter where you go. What is different is our political coalitions and our political systems. One thing I do know: this isn't about religion. Some people say that America doesn't legalize prostitution because this is such a religious country... but prostitution is legal in Mexico and Brazil, which are two fairly religious Catholic countries. Meanwhile prostitution is illegal in China, an officially atheist country.

Freedom of speech doesn't mean the right to scream and shout wherever you please, and it doesn't mean the right to block traffic or damage property. Why don't the police arrest them?

@Nicole1994 - I can't even respond to you. You write so poorly and with so many typos and abbreviations that it's almost illegible. It hurts my head to read the shit you write. Even when you make sense, you still don't make much sense. Maybe I should just put you on ignore. I don't have anyone else on ignore, not even flagooner (and he's and elderly retard), but I might have to make you my first. @NinaBambina - I think you are using the wrong tactic. This argument should be much simpler. They're talking about mind-altering drugs. Taking a mind-altering drug is merely an attempt to change one's mind. Does anybody really believe that changing your mind should be illegal? Having said that, I'm not sure that you should even waste your time talking to flagooner. As I said, he is a confused retard. I think he only wades into debates so that he can pretend to be bored with the debate. It's always the same stupid routine. And he should be more careful when talking about what is and isn't a drain on society. flagooner is demonstrably a drain on society, himself. For one thing, he receives Social Security and Medicare. For another, his children went to public school. So surely the average drug user contributes more to society and costs less than he does. When we think of people merely in terms of how much they cost the rest of us, we inevitably end up throwing lots of people out of the boat. And we should start with flagooner and his family. I'm just sayin'.