discussion comment
6 years ago
"just one question 4 society's dumbass"
Which one of us is society's dumbass? Based on my time spent on TUSCL, I would say that our society actually has several dumbasses.
discussion comment
6 years ago
Who gets the award for Most Elaborate Trolling?
discussion comment
6 years ago
Well if he doesn't want someone criticizing him for having an anchor-baby then I guess he shouldn't have had one. Personally, I'm ok with all the illegals staying - I would only deport flagooner's family :)
discussion comment
6 years ago
^ Ok. I think you and your illegal immigrant wife should go and blow your anchor-baby son.
discussion comment
6 years ago
^^^
Do you have a particular problem with what I wrote? Because if you do, then why not just argue against it? I find you as obnoxious as you find me, but I mostly just ignore you. My guess is that you disagree with me but you realize that you lack the intellect and the stamina to have a real argument.
discussion comment
6 years ago
![]()
flagoonerEverything written by this member is a fact.
"So for everyone bitching about Trump, they better start bitching about waters, reid, pelosi, etc"
I do.
discussion comment
6 years ago
Sorry, I stepped right into your Russiagate propaganda. Yes, obviously Obama tried to investigate the Trump-Russia connection. That's what politicians do. They try to win at any cost, but then if their side loses, they'll cry foul and try to deligitimize the other side's victory. Same thing happened with Bush v. Gore in 2000. And then it happened again when the Birthers claimed that Obama wasn't eligible to be president after 2008. And again when Trump supporters shouted "lock her up" and talked about a "rigged election," under the assumption that Trump would lose to "Crooked Hillary." So isn't this just part of a pattern?
Plus in this case, if laws were actually broken, I suppose Obama had a duty to act. Now having said that, I hope you'll agree with me that these are very stupid laws, and I'm personally glad that the Russians hacked the DNC, etc.
discussion comment
6 years ago
Just because they were creepy and outlandish or because their claims were silly and unrealistic?
discussion comment
6 years ago
@mark94,
I agree with every word of your RCP article. But now I'm just wondering, how did you feel about *real* birtherism back when Donald Trump was still pushing it a few years ago?
discussion comment
6 years ago
They weren't specific, but they said they had received "too many" complaints about my language. I can't find anything about specific words in their Terms of Use, but I'll definitely be more careful from now on. Of the hundreds of women who've been in contact with me on the site, three or four have blocked me, so it's possible that they each reported my language as well. It's just too much of a coincidence that I was banned right after this latest incident. I'm never reporting anyone ever again unless I literally get robbed.
I never use words like "sex" "money" "host" "full service" etc., but I do *occasionally* use the term PPM or I'll ask about a "per meeting arrangement." I'm aware that this is not allowed, but I figure if you can't even say PPM then it will be difficult to communicate; you'll end up texting for days with someone who potentially wants a 5k/month allowance when you only want to spend 300 a pop. Having said that, I do try to move the conversation off the site ASAP, and in fact, I even warned the recent scammer not to say certain words to me on SA. It usually isn't necessary to even use these terms at all. Anyway, hopefully they will accept my "written statement" and I'll be back in business by tomorrow.
Other than that, I agree with everything that's been said here. Even flagooner's comment is a fairly accurate description of the sex industry in general (SCs included).
discussion comment
6 years ago
@juicebox69,
Just so I know in case it ever happens again, what do you need when you start a new account? Do you always need a different credit card number and a different email address?
discussion comment
6 years ago
Quick update for anyone who gives a shit. I just received an email from SA saying that they’ll give me one last chance and reinstate me but that I have to promise not to break their rules ever again. They actually want a written statement. Have you guys ever heard of such bullshit? But problem solved, I guess
discussion comment
6 years ago
^^^
I think you're right. She took one look through her peephole, saw that I was only wearing a tracksuit, and changed her mind about me. At this point maybe I should just try front-room makeout sessions. The system is too complicated for me.
discussion comment
6 years ago
@txtittyfag ,
“you sure as hell aint no conservative”
You’re right. I ain’t no conservative. I support balanced budgets, deregulation, low taxes, and the second amendment… but I also support abortion, immigration, free speech, free trade, etc. I’m totally against campaign-finance reform, Net Neutrality, the death penalty, and the UN. And I support your right to get gay-married to flagooner whenever you want. That’s not a conservative. That’s a libertarian. There’s a lot of people crawling around TUSCL who call themselves libertarians, but I’m the real deal. I think we’re about done here, amigo.
discussion comment
6 years ago
@flagooner,
You seem to feel the need to read and respond to my posts even though most of them are directed at mark94, RandomMember, and twentyfive. Say what you want about them, at least they’re coherent and on-topic. Anyway, fuck your mail-order wife. I still say she married you for citizenship. And I sincerely hope your kids contract HIV the next time they blow their father.
discussion comment
6 years ago
^^^
Well that sucks. Do you think I can dispute the charge on my credit card?
discussion comment
6 years ago
For someone who doesn't read my posts you spend a lot of time responding to them. And you're right, whenever we talk about politics, everyone here just repeats the same old lines again and again. More proof that no one on the internet will ever convince anyone of anything ever. (Granted, you have convinced me that you're an asshole and a waste of time, but unintentionally I'm sure.)
Also I notice that when I argue with liberals like RandomMember, SJG, and PoolyD I get accused of either shilling for the GOP or defending Trump too much. And when I talk to conservatives I get exactly the opposite reaction. Anyone who doesn't choose a tribe is automatically disliked by both sides.
Let's see, what else... Oh yeah, I remember now: I think your wife is a transvestite prostitute who married you for citizenship. Go ahead, prove I'm wrong.
discussion comment
6 years ago
It's an art, not a science I guess LOL. Anyway, I have a feeling that if I hadn't ratted her out I would still have my membership today. Has anyone here ever been banned and then allowed back on?
discussion comment
6 years ago
^^^
You may be right. I think there are premium accounts for women, too, but most of them seem to have free accounts.
discussion comment
6 years ago
@Papi_Chulo,
When you report someone to SA they give you several categories to choose from, including Suspected Escort and Scammer (or something like that). I chose Scammer. I told the story to SA in broad strokes, but they can read my messages anytime they want to.
In our messages, she asked me what I was looking for, and I responded that I was looking for an attractive woman who needs some assistance. I was not explicit. She responded by asking "how much?" Literally, just like that. I responded that I know she's new but that she should be more careful and I suggested that we text. At that point I gave her my number and she texted me the next day. I suppose SA can construe whatever they want from that message, and certainly from other messages I've sent to other girls in the past, but it feels like I attracted their attention just by reporting her... or maybe she retaliated like chessmaster said, IDK.
Oh, also, I know a girl who's been banned before, and she was able to sign up again with a new account by just using a different email. So it should be possible. But that's a pain in the ass. I don't want to create a new profile. And they owe me money.
discussion comment
6 years ago
@RandomMember,
I usually do meet in public, but she seemed harmless and genuine at the time. She was communicating regularly right up to the very moment that I knocked on "her" door, but then immediately stopped. Maybe it was catfishing, but it all happened pretty quickly. A few days of messaging/texting, and then we were arranging a meeting. I thought catfishers drag it out for a long time. Either way, it was a weird experience. I wonder what would have happened if I hadn't tried to report her. I had never reported anyone before.
discussion comment
6 years ago
@flagooner,
You know, I really expect so much more from you. At least txtittyfag is funny. Do you even bother to read anything I write? It's ok, my grandfather used to fall asleep whenever he tried to read and write, too. Hopefully when I'm old like you, I'll still have the faculties and energy to post graffiti on a forum, too.
discussion comment
6 years ago
^^^
Believe whatever you want. I'm a libertarian. You know, free markets, free trade, religious freedom, low taxes, etc. I actually voted for Ted Cruz. Kind of the opposite of an Obama supporter. I don't want to make this into a political post. Still, I do find the Yosemite Sam routine kind of funny.
discussion comment
6 years ago
@txtittyfag,
You're not very helpful LOL. What's with the "BarakHusseinFactory" stuff?
discussion comment
6 years ago
There's a lot of hypocrites here. They'll probably say something about how they only like *legal* immigrants... but they're totally full of shit because the kind of immigrants who are willing to work a greasy pole tend to be the illegal variety. I'm sure there are exceptions, but that's the general rule. In general most people turn a blind eye whenever it suits them. If most immigrant meat-packers and gardeners are illegal, then most immigrant sex-workers are probably illegal, too. It's a cash-only job in a legal gray area, so dancing seems tailor-made for illegal immigrants.
If we reform our immigration laws so that only "productive" members of society are allowed in, trust me, most immigrants would look a lot more like David Beckham and Sergey Brin, and a lot less like someone who's willing to do extras in a VIP room.
Also, the people here who want zero-tolerance for illegal immigrants wouldn't be happy with a zero-tolerance policy for most other crimes and violations. (Soliciting, for example.)
Personally, I wouldn't grant citizenship, but I'm fine with amnesty. As a whole, I think immigrants tend to make the country a better place and I would be happy if we would allow the market to set the actual number of immigrants rather than some government bureaucrats and politicians.