Comments by misterorange

@rickdugan @whodey I like both of you guys, but with all due respect, you're defending Netflix as if I had denigrated your favorite girl at your favorite club. Rick, I've never had a problem with Amazon Prime, or Fubo, or any other app/provider. They're sluggish and difficult to navigate compared to cable, but they're not dysfunctional. It's only Netflix that gives me trouble, and it's always on live events. For me, Netflix fucking SUCKS. But no worries, I cancelled my subscription, so you won't have to tolerate my bitching and moaning about Netflix anymore. Fuck 'em. No event is so important that I'll put up with their bullshit.

^^ Yup. It sucks is the problem. I don't disagree with whodey, it makes sense for tv shows, movies, etc. But the #1 priority for live sports should be to show it live without glitches. Imagine you're at a Super Bowl party and what you're watching is a quarter or two behind the actual game. That's no fun at all. And I'm pretty sure with cable or Fios you can DVR stuff, although I've never cared to use that. I do admit I'm a curmudgeonly old fuck.

You may be right whodey. But forgive me, I think it's best that when you pay for something and turn it on, it should work without a bunch of acrobatics. Canceling cable was a very bad decision. I don't know how this "streaming" shit is so popular. Of course with regular cable, I wouldn't have access to the game at all, so I don't have much of a choice. I guess we just have to take anything the socialists offer us, and love it.

Thanks, but seriously? Who at Netflix thinks this is a good idea? Default should be live, and rewind if you want to re-watch what already happened. Especially when you choose "watch live". It's no wonder this world is so fucked up.

Right now it's 4:15 and there's 11 min left in the 3rd. (Game is actually over.)

^ Yup. Watch live. And I closed out the app, restarted my TV, and went back into it. My internet provider is Verizon Fios gigabit connection. Never had a problem with that ever, except with Netflix.

That's why I own a rowboat.

Yeah, I'm all over the dark-haired one. The singer, nah.

Oink oink

100% smash.

Yeah that's some weird shit. I don't recall a stripper ever saying that to me, but it would be a turn-off. Papi I've heard a few times. I guess that's technically the same thing but for some reason doesn't bother me as much. Probably because "Daddy" is what my own kids called me so that makes it real creepy.

@WiseToo - "An adjudicator needs to have some slack in the criteria used for reviews of infrequently reviewed clubs because some information about a recent visit to the club is better than nothing." Totally agree. Go easy on those reviews because there's so little written or it's been a long time so any tidbit of intel is useful. But still, the adjudicator should at least know enough to understand if it's a valid review and not bullshit.

My result: Your food choices resemble those of the lower-middle class (75%). Regular Mid-class and Low-class were the next two strongest. Upper and Upper-Mid were the lowest, even though I rated the caviar as a favorite.

I agree with most of what’s been said already, so let me change it up a bit. Sometimes I get annoyed by the adjudicators and the criteria they use to approve or reject reviews. I won’t name names but some guys need to be a little more thoughtful in their approach. First, it looks like a few of you must go down the list and just approve anything that appears long enough. Reviews getting approved when they have almost no useful content. Now I’m not one of these sticklers that will reject a submission because it doesn’t check every box. I’m pretty easy in that regard. But there has been some real garbage getting approved lately. And even worse (thankfully this doesn’t happen as often) what reads like a fairly good review is actually some made-up bullshit that would be obvious to anyone who’s been to that club before. I kinda think adjudicators should stick to approving places they know something about. More to come on that. This also goes the other way. Reviews being rejected for no good reason. Example would be that I see reviews in my home turf of NJ rejected because it doesn’t say whether the stage shows and/or lap dances were topless or nude. Well, in this state, if there’s alcohol served it’s illegal to have anything other than bikini dances. No topless. No nude. No anything. If the adjudicator knew that, he’d understand when the reviewer says, “My rum and coke was $11” and then doesn’t expressly state that the girls kept their tops on. Not to say that shenanigans don’t happen in the VIP (they certainly do) but “officially” topless dancing is a no-go unless it’s a BYOB juice bar. So, my main point is, an adjudicator should ask himself whether he's really qualified to pass judgment on a review for a particular club or jurisdiction. I know, it takes a majority to approve or reject, but some of what I’ve described is so frequent, it’s almost like every review in NJ starts off with a strike against, or every review that’s at least two paragraphs long gets a free thumbs up. Same adjudicators over and over. When I skim through the unpublished reviews, I’m first looking at the state the club resides in. If something outside my area catches my eye, I might read it out of curiosity, but I don’t approve reviews for clubs I know nothing about. On the other hand, when I spot a 1 or 2 sentence review that is clearly pure garbage, I’ll reject no matter the location. But outside of that, I’ll leave it up to the locals who know what’s what.

@shadow - Lol, I forgot about Amish Paradise. One of Weird Al's best!

So the first time you got sucked and fingered the girl until she squirted, and that was $10 plus a generous $10 tip. What did you spent for all the activities on the 2nd trip? Like 50 bucks?

I have gone to VIP and dropped the pants to my ankles before she even puts down her purse. But showing up without pants to begin with, now THAT'S a novel idea. I'm thinking maybe a tee-shirt with a downward pointing arrow and some instructions - possibly in both English and Portuguese.

Whatta-you-know... I was just thinking how long it's been since we had a pants discussion!

I'll smash and let you guys know how it was.

If you have VIP just click the purple TUSCL logo at the top of the page and then click on the first button that says "What's Nearby?". The same map you're used to will come right up.

Butterface? To me the face is the only part that's not too bad.

Fuck no.

I'm 58 (don't know what "gen" that is) and I've been eating ass since my first long-term college girlfriend back in 1986. The first time we planned it in advance and took a bath together beforehand. Cleaned her up real good and then got in bed to do the deed. She loved it so much that after the initial time I'd just shift from pussy to ass every time I went down. Since then I've done it with more than I can count. Had to pass on a few strippers that either didnt turn me on that much or if they were smelly.

It's easy: BBBJCIM

Why is she teasing the poor guy? Just get down and suck it, baby!