Comments by FTS (page 17)

^^ No, not average, showing again that you are Loco! Average is 5'3" 170 lbs with retarded expressions.

Yin an Yang. Let's not be so narrow-minded. "Today, in ecclesiastical circles, sex is being damned with faint praise. People are saying: “After all, yes, sex was made by God and we should remember the Jewish point of view. And it is perhaps for something more than reproduction. To bring about the cementing of the marriage ties between husband and wive. But, still, in practise, it remains the frightening taboo.” On the other hand, the opposition to Christian prudery goes overboard and always moves in the direction of total license. You see, what’s going on is a contest between the people who want the skirts pulled down to the floor and the people who want them pulled up to the neck. And you know you ‘got to draw the line somewhere. But the play between these forces is: where are we gonna draw it? Well that’s very exciting, provide neither side wins. I mean, imagine what it would be like if the libertines won and they took over the Church. So that on Wednesday evenings, the young Presbyterian group would meet for prayer-through-sex. Every child would go to the school physician for a course in hygienics and they’d have classes and they’d have plastic models and all the children would do it in class in very clean hygienic circumstances, all sprayed with rubbing alcohol. Imagine how boring it would all become! So you see, the people who say “No, modesty is important!” have something right about them. But they mustn’t be allowed to get away with it. But they mustn’t be obliterated. See, life works that way." - Alan Watts

"But that's where the sense of entitlement comes in. He thinks he's too good for what he can get and feels deserving of something better just because he wants it." - That may be true for the 27-year-old virgin shooter, but it's not generally true for all people who would refuse to have sexual relations with a "4". Choosing to pass on a sexual encounter is not indicative of an attitude of entitlement. In the same way, turning down an offer of free food is not indicative of an attitude of entitlement. Pursuing happiness is a right here in the United States: "We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness." "free ice cream!"---"no thank you, I don't eat sweets (I have diabetes)" "free roller coaster ride"---"no thank you, I don't enjoy riding roller coasters" "free sex with me"---"no thank you, I don't find you physically attractive" "minimum wage job offer"---"no thank you, I prefer a life of subsistence living" "minimum wage job offer"---"no thank you, I have enough savings I can afford to wait for a higher offer" "high wage job offer"--"no thank you, I still prefer a life of subsistence living!" "free hand gun"---"no thank you, too dangerous" Is a person "entitled" to food that is "better" than ice cream if he/she/they turns it down? Is a person "entitled" to... not riding a roller coaster... if he/she/they turn it down? That doesn't even make sense! Think, IceyLoco! Don't be so loco!

“There is no reason why these guys can't just fuck 4s or lower.” - I wouldn’t fuck a 4 or lower even if I was in the middle of a decade long dry spell. My dick might shrink down just from the sight of her, as if I was outside in -30 degree weather and my balls just crawl back into my abdomen. As DC said, there are hookers out there who are stunningly beautiful.

@DC, yes I agree that money doesn't provide a direct route vers la chatte, except when used to pay for prostitutes. I think that great wealth does, however, provide an indirect route, but perhaps not the way people often imagine. I don't think it happens so often that: woman meets man, woman learns that man is wealthy, woman sleeps with man because he's wealthy. Or even: woman meets man, man buys woman many gifts, woman sleeps with man (hell, I'd bet that hardly ever happens!) Rather, I think great wealth provides so many perks in life that getting laid is just plain easier; it requires less effort. I mean, life itself is less of an effort for those who have already acquired wealth. The process of acquiring the wealth, for sure, usually requires great effort (excepting those trust fund babies). But once you've got it, I imagine it must be hard to resist the temptation of spoiling yourself! One thing I've noticed about myself is that I do better with women when my responsibilities are less. In particular, it was far easier to develop social connections and attract women during summer vacations and during those early times in college semesters when there was hardly any homework to do and no tests to study for. I had no worries! I was fed and sheltered through no effort of my own, except for some part-time low wage jobs. How much different life feels now that I have a full-blown career that requires my constant attention, as well as bills to pay, food to prepare, errands to run, etc. (and I'm probably quite lazy compared to others in my field who are married with kids). So, I imagine that there is a minority of young and middle-aged men who 1) are millionaires, 2) work few hours, 3) use their money to streamline their lives and reduce the number of their responsibilities, and 4) spend a significant portion of their waking hours pursuing and attracting women. Whether it is through spending hours in the gym every day, spending hours expanding their social network every day, or spending hours meeting, dating, and attracting new women in clubs/malls/bars/conventions etc. every day, they are spending those hours for those purposes, while the lower and middle classes spend most of their hours surviving. I suspect that this incel/redpill/mgtow subculture is most prevalent in the law-abiding lower and middle classes who strive to live healthy, settled lives. The minority of men who DON'T abide by the law, and who engage in relatively toxic and violent behavior, provide a level of excitement (albeit a very different kind of excitement than that provided by the wealthy) that gets the right type of woman's panties sufficiently wet. Biker gangs come to mind, and there are definitely women out there who fantasize about being the biker gang slut. Either way, it comes down to how men spend their time; a man is what he does. To provide a sweeping generalization that is without nuance: the "nice guys" who need more attaboys spend their time working, and the "bad boys" dominate through violence, disobedience, and (financial) leverage, and thus spend their time maintaining their harems.

This is precisely why I wear nice clothes to the clubs; it creates the illusion that I actually have some money haha. Thank god they can't look at my accounts!

"As for the 1950s thing, I'd argue that the comparative extreme promiscuity of people in the modern age is exactly why it was easier in the 1950s. Losing your virginity is nothing, it doesn't actually mean much, its about whether you can continue getting sex on some kind of regular basis or whether you end up having like two hookups for the entire year and don't get any sex outside of that. The social elite just doesn't think about it that way because getting laid is easy to them so high levels of promiscuity in their eyes means getting to fuck whenever you want, with whoever you want. The reality for everyone else, however, is that rampant promiscuity means that almost all the girls are going for the guys in the social elite and you get the scraps. So essentially, you get maybe one or two one time hookups per year and that's it. With less promiscuity, girls fuck a guy and then they stay and continue to have sex with that guy. The social elite gets to be mildly promiscuous, having a fling or two on the side of their main girl, but everyone else gets to have one woman they can rely on to like them and want to have sex with them. In the 1950s, if you managed to lose your virginity you could probably continue having an active sex life as long as you wanted because girls back then wanted a commitment." - Which came first, the promiscuity, the reason for the promiscuity, or the illusion of greater promiscuity? Seems to me like the combination of extreme wealth inequality, public awareness through social media, and instant gratification, has the effect of increasing promiscuity, especially in women. Why? Because in the 1950s, there were no social media, MTV, Million Dollar Cribs TV shows, so the apparent access to super walthy men was thin to none. And there wasn't any social media to be addicted to, so people weren't constantly comparing themselves to others, women weren't comparing their boyfriends to others, etc. And, of course, no porn! Both men, AND WOMEN, had no access to streaming 1080p harcore pornography... the most they had was a rare photograph of a person in a swimsuit, or a playboy magazine, which nowadays is considered virtually harmless. Not to say that pornography is a bad thing (hell, those ISIS guys would probably be way more calm if they were like a lot of the guys here and jacked off to some porn every couple of days), but the combination is probably not very positive for both sexes. A lot of men and women nowadays (mostly men) learn about sex, not by engaging in it, but by watching videos of others on an LCD screen. Essentially, both men and women have become more aware, and conscious, of their position on the social ladder, as well as the position of others on that ladder... and these extreme behaviors are the manifestation of our animal instincts reacting to such awareness. What else would cause a young man to snap, and go on a shooting rampage, than the very real illusion of forever being at the bottom rungs of the social ladder, with no money and no status to ever catch the attention of an even mildly attractive woman? Sounds rather bleak, doesn't it? The problem, I think, is that this illusion is more than a mere illusion... it's a self-fulfilling thing. The illusion creates the anxiety which produces the behaviors that further enhance the illusion. I'm sure these incel shootings don't reflect very positively on young men, low on the social ladder. How are women supposed to respond? By rushing to every poor young man and sucking their dicks? No, they're probably more inclined to run the hell away! And what does that do but enchance the illusion for young men that they will remain single and sexless. My guess is, as you said, just like income inequality, there may be greater inequality in sexual activity (partially caused by the income inequality). The likes of JohnSmith and gawker can fuck hot 22 yr olds because of their wealth. Was it always so easy? I would guess not, because wealth was not as unequal as it is today.

^ It's worse than that. They're all fat and short and disfigured. Don't go, worst club ever.

I kinda wish I lived in a country where most people were generally quite healthy. I went to Montreal, Canada a couple of times and was quite impressed by the women there.

@flagooner, I wasn’t referring to any peer pressure from this forum, in particular, i’m referring to the general peer pressure and social programming that every person in civilized society experiences. These pressure and social programming can be counter to our evolutionary programming. Do you realize that every single other creature on this planet shits in a carefree manner, often on the ground, without any regard to social convention or consequence.... but us humans... we have a very special chair in which we empty our bowels. And what do we call people who are SO DISGUSTING that they shit in the woods? We call them “animals!” “Such crude behavior!” Flagooner, why don’t you go back to Heaven and sit on Zeus’s lap? I’m sure you’ll be far more comfortable there, where nobody fucks inappropriately or displays any animalistic behavior. Don’t worry, I won’t bother you with any prayers.

This is all a bunch of bullshit, and merely opinions formed by peer pressure and political pressures. Let’s not forget what we are; let’s not forget the fundamental reality of our existence: We are animals. Your DNA doesn’t give a fu k what your left or right wing agenda is. Sure, you can look away from the hot girl so you won’t get a boner, but that’s merely social programming, a mask, a deception. Use that “w” word all you want... Wrong.... as if Zeus will strike you down with a thunderbolt from Mt. Olympus. Or you can stop making shit up.

I can see the logic of sending a dick pic, though. Might it provide some degree of confidence, for the woman, that the guy's dick isn't some STD-ridden, boil-covered, hairy monster? It also might provide her with some level of information about the guy. 1. she knows exactly what his dick looks like, 2. she knows he has the confidence (not the same as social tact) to show off his reproductive organ, 3. She knows what his pubes are like. It also immediately makes the relationship an explicitly sexual one, if it wasn't one already. Similarly, if a girl spreads her legs and takes a flattering photo of her pussy and sends it to you, and it looks great, you then have some confidence that it's not going to be some crusty, hairy, bumpy thing. Of course, some people might not really care about any of these things...

Recently, Heather Harmon.

I can beat that. https://www.redtube.com/146802

The chart that I showed might just end up holding true: 205 months before January 2019 the 1s10s spread was 2.9%. The RSI of the monthly S&P 500 is down to 43.5.

My comment used the following definition of “speculation:” speculation noun the contemplation or consideration of some subject: to engage in speculation on humanity's ultimate destiny. a single instance or process of consideration. a conclusion or opinion reached by such contemplation: These speculations are impossible to verify. conjectural consideration of a matter; conjecture or surmise: a report based on speculation rather than facts.

People speculate because that is what is required in any business transaction. Please remove your head from your anus.

Why do I feel conflicted about this? How can I agree with all of you that this is a horrible thing, and at the same time I look at her photo, I remember how I fantasized about my teachers at that age, and I think to myself “damn, I wish that had happened to me?”

^^^ “Any sufficiently advanced [game] is indistinguishable from [a rigged system].”

@justaguy, thanks for replying to my question. It’s a high correlation, but perhaps it’s just coincidence.

These drugs are sweaooooknezv!

That was fhnZzzz

Wisdom terth

^^^ Yes, their moves account for the bulk of the overall moves of the market. But do they employ any market timing strategies? Perhaps they have economic forecasts, and due to the fact that TODAY is not TOMORROW, the prices are set as they are today with the anticipation of the direction in which they are headed. I.e. how do you know they aren't also saying amongst themselves, "we see a high probability of a recession in 2019/2020, so there is no reason to sell everything TODAY."?

Not sure how easy it is to generalize in this manner. Are we comparing ALL strippers to ALL escorts? Not all strippers engage in OTC p4p, whereas p4p is the primary function of an escort. So, if we are maximally inclusive when discussing these two categories, it then becomes "maybe sex" vs. "guaranteed sex." Of course, with that comes other pros and cons, like "you get to see her first" vs. "you only get to see pics of her first." Ultimately, I think strippers are less business-minded and more carefree; part-way between girl-next-door civvie chick and professional courtesan.