discussion comment
15 years ago
Don't be floored, mitciv. Most Americans love this country and love liberty, unlike anti-American leftists.
discussion comment
15 years ago
![]()
rickduganVerified and Certifiable Super-Reviewer
Those gals are welcome to their little clique where they can plot how to take more money while doing less. But if they think they will get my money for merely teasing me, they are deluded. To each his own, of course.
discussion comment
15 years ago
That article describes a Sheriff with some common sense and some leadership. Applause for Joe...
discussion comment
15 years ago
Never heard of T-Pain, but consider Prince/Symbol/The-Artist-Formerly-Known-As-Prince/The-Artist/Prince:
He had some raunchy songs (Jack U Off, Sexy M-F, Erotic City, etc.), but also some spiritual songs (The Cross, 7, The Word, etc.)
discussion comment
15 years ago
Steve, that poor little bikini has no chance to contain that mASSive booty! It's just not fair, I tell ya...
discussion comment
15 years ago
![]()
rickduganVerified and Certifiable Super-Reviewer
Redefining established terms to "win a debate" is pointless. f_d feels resentment towards those who make more than she, and there is nothing unusual about that. So be it.
discussion comment
15 years ago
Before Kourtney got knocked up, she was probably the most do-able. But Kim is surely pretty, even if she has a cartoon-parody sized booty...
discussion comment
15 years ago
![]()
rickduganVerified and Certifiable Super-Reviewer
f_d said, "In a SC, there is no such balance. We are all vying for customers; every patron who walks in the door has the potential to give money to ANY of us. Therefore, when you have a dancer willing to whore herself out, a chance that would be leapt at by a patron, the rest of us have just been robbed. Both of money and also of the POTENTIAL to make money."
True, until you claim to have been robbed. You're "vying for money," she's "vying for money." If you have what someone is willing to give you money for, you can get some money. If not, not. No one has robbed you just because you don't make all the money that you see potentially out there...
discussion comment
15 years ago
Ignore MG. He is either the most evil liar in history, or simply too ignorant of the truth to be a functioning member of humanity. Hard to imagine evil like MG exhibits actually exists, but there it is for you to see...
discussion comment
15 years ago
I am unwilling to pay for your ignorance. But you are irrelevant and worthless, so feel free to continue in your pitiful ways. Those who love America will defend her against the left, whatever it takes.
Yes, leftists hate America. They will say, "I love America! I love America so much I want to fundamentally change the country." And they either won't realize the inherent idiocy of their statement, or they'll hope everyone else fails to realize it. No such luck.
discussion comment
15 years ago
arbeeguy said, "I don't personally know a single leftist who wants to subvert the constitution of the US or forcibly redistribute the assets of the US."
Sen Max Baucus said, "'Health reform' is an income shift. It is a shift, a leveling."
Gov Howard Dean said, "This [health care bill] is a form of redistribution."
Pres Barack Obama said, "We have to spread the wealth around."
Great patriot Samuel Adams said, "The Utopian schemes of leveling are as visionary and impractical as those which vest all property in the Crown. These ideas are arbitrary, despotic, and, in our government, unconstitutional."
I suppose your statement can be seen as true, arbeeguy, in that you may not "personally know" the senator, governor, president, nor the scores of accomplices they have in their subversion of the constitution; however, that should be cold comfort.
discussion comment
15 years ago
arbeeguy, you are correct that "enemies of the United States are people/organizations opposed to our constitution." And that describes leftists. Your guess that it is merely 1% of the left is wishful thinking. Did you not hear anything about what nearly 100% of elected democrats (a mainstream brand of "leftist") have been doing for the past few years?
discussion comment
15 years ago
![]()
rickduganVerified and Certifiable Super-Reviewer
@f_d, your logic does not have any merit. If I choose to buy dinner at "Texas Roadhouse," then every other restaurant lost the opportunity to have that money. But so what? The proprietor of "Texas Roadhouse" did not rob those other restaurants. Nor did any extras-providing dancer rob you when a guy chooses her over you...
discussion comment
15 years ago
caualguy, the entire Kardashian family had (has?) a show called "Keeping up with the Kardashians," and that spun off another show about two of the sisters. I think it is on the E! channel.
discussion comment
15 years ago
So, based on MG's non-response, I gather that the "insight" was merely BS he made up, hoping some believe it. He is a leftist, and therefore an enemy of the United States. Shameful and horrific, MG is.
discussion comment
15 years ago
Lipstixx in Tampa. The old location, not the new one.
discussion comment
15 years ago
![]()
rickduganVerified and Certifiable Super-Reviewer
@f_d, I cannot agree with your statement that "having a girl who gives extras in a club is the same as having someone in your place of business who robs the till/safe."
That other girl who does more is providing something for which others are willing to pay, so she's not robbing the safe. What she is providing is across a certain boundary, so judge all you like, but your analogy is completely wrong.
And she has nothing to do with your inability to make money, if that were the case, so to project responsibility on her as your statements do is also wrong.
discussion comment
15 years ago
MG said to CT, "You're acting like the govt. actually *wants* to own shares in financial institutions, auto companies, insurance companies, etc.. It really doesn't."
This is a fascinating insight of which I was unaware. How did you come to this knowledge, MG?
discussion comment
15 years ago
Glad to know G's on the mend. All the best...
discussion comment
15 years ago
You can succeed on any shift, judyjudy, but after reading your posts in this thread, I suggest you avoid the day shift. Why put yourself through feeling nervous or even scared when you're in this for fun?
discussion comment
15 years ago
I prefer the suggestive talk to the overtly raunchy, but surely it is nice to get some aural stimulation along with the rest of it...
discussion comment
15 years ago
@f_d, age is a secondary or tertiary consideration at most. It's about "connection," even if it's all in our minds. For me, that connection has typically included activities beyond your established boundaries, but for many, what you offer could be enough to maintain interest and make that "connection."
discussion comment
15 years ago
Just got around to this post... nicely done, Steve!
discussion comment
15 years ago
Regarding extras: I'll absolutely respect and abide by any limit any dancer establishes; however, I am unlikely to buy dances from those whose limits are less than all-the-way, since I have no interest in paying to be teased.
discussion comment
15 years ago
Haven't seen the show. Looked at the HuffPo link above (thanks, samsung1), and "Snooki" looks cute enough. I suppose the negativity about her may be due to attitude; is that the case?