Age of the reviewer

FWIW, I don't care

A review should stand on its own. If people want to put their age in their user profiles and someone reading is interested they can click the profile. I don’t see it as mandatory info though.

^ Ditto. I'm all for the least amount of regulations.

The one rule I do like is filtering out "penis women" who claim to be women or strippers.

You trying to make it like a goddam Reddit flair”?

Let the review stand in its own. It should matter if I like rock or rap. Mary Ann or Ginger. Chipotle or McDonald’s.

Yeah, let's post our driver's licenses to verify our ages while we're at it. /s

You should just have to post your IQ, your political leanings, and the size of your dick.

It's simple...visited prior to 8pm.....> 40 years old...after 8pm....< 40.

Exception for "in town on business"

Lmao @funonthaside

But seriously. A quality review is a quality review. Age has no relevance.

I’m 14.

I don’t think it’s a good idea. No one wants to advertise who they are. And people can just lie anyway.

You trying to chase away all the 14 year old boys that lurk on here?

I think the detail that asks for the "amount of money" spent at the club could be removed. I don't care what some other PL spends or claims to have spent and it is not relevant. What is important are the prices, e.g., cover, drink, lap dance, vip, etc.

What the hell does the age of the author have to do with the price of tea in China?

Why would it matter?

How old are you?

Everyone send in their birth certificate, even if it's Kenyan.

I don't think the age of the review would be much help to me in deciding if a club was worth a visit. I'd rather not give my precise age, only increases the chances of someone connecting my posts to me irl.

as others have said, not relevant... and I'm not interested in sharing that either

Would one category be 18 (for nude clubs)to 50, one 51 to 75, and one 76-100? If so I'm clicking 76-100 every time even though I'm not in that category.

"Mandatory". What the fuck. Want to suck the fun out of anything? Start using the word "mandatory".

Most of us old fuckheads pretty much reveal ourselves anyway. And even if we don't, it ain't too hard to read between the lines. Plus, I have never gone to a club based on a review and concluded: "That asshole whose review I read must be from a different demographic from me, as I disagree with his opinion."

Anyone younger than 40 and single has no business spending time and money in a strip club. They should be out getting civilian pussy and leave the strip club pussy to us old married geezers who have to pay for it.

Yeah, I don't think any personal details like age should ever be REQUIRED. Some might be perfectly comfortable stating their age, or some kind of reference to their general age range, but then again some might not want to share that info...

I'm still going strong at 117, but if you saw me, you'd think maybe 108 tops...

Not something I really care about, but I would be OK with an age range as something you could select.

What makes you think a person post their real age though. Reviews are full of lies as is

How did I miss this thread?

I don't think age is relevant to reviews. Most people on TUSCL are probably at least 40.

Age can be relevant. It helps explain why 25 for example goes at opening so he doesn't miss his afternoon nap. Why some consider 9pm late night. It also helps understand the interaction between dancer and customer. Like why some call 30+ hardened meth hoes hot. Or Gordieboy dying his hair thinking he looks 20 but treated like creepy grandpa.

But in general I dont think it should be asked on a review site.

I'm at least 40.

Age can be relevant, it explains for example why an idiot like Icey thinks his idiotic school yard insults, miss their mark and tell us more about him, with his hero worship of minority gangsters and other types of societal misfits, like pimps, and misogynistic woman abusers, tell us he's a born loser, who is on the wrong side of every discussion, and has the morals of a snake.

Having an age field for accounts would be fine but definitely not something mandatory on Reviews.

The way a reviewer writes tells so much more about them than just another fake number associated with their PL persona anyway.

Fuck age. Reviews should be required to estimate the dancer average for this metric: www.youtube.com .

Yes. I have to agree. she does have a great t!t to arm ratio.

If the poster gives any hint that the dancers "like him" or that he "dates them for free", you know 2 things: The poster is young and the poster is a liar.