The TUSCLer Two Decade Club
Later this year I'll have been lurking around TUSCL for 20 years. So as I recall shadowcat was in the midst of his run at Platinum Plus back in 2004 when I started posting after my old college buddy got put on lockdown by the wife lol. He was the guy finding hole in the wall clubs here before that but didn't post on the boards. I know some of you were also around back then but searching for stuff like that isn't fast.Where are the other guys who've been telling fish stories here for a couple of decades?
Got something to say?
Start your own discussion
49 comments
Latest
I don't miss desertscrub.
Boomer79 I was known as the Candyman at the Columbia Platinum Plus.
I hit my favorite club today but will probably go back Thursday to celebrate my 82nd birthday which is on next Saturday.
I got to admit it’s sort of odd to think about 2004 as two decades ago. That’s why I try to have as much fun as I can I’m well aware of that clock.
"I got to admit it’s sort of odd to think about 2004 as two decades ago."
It's pretty crazy when I start to think about what I was into back then in my 20s and how much more there was to see and do lol. And I'd already done a ton of shit in the hobby even then. Just saw things differently in those days. It's not how time works, but it would've been fun to have some of the old TUSCL conversations over again with what I know now.
"That’s why I try to have as much fun as I can I’m well aware of that clock."
Dude shadowcat's in his 80s and still getting down. Keep your game face on and the good times will be there. But to your point I'm definitely enjoying all the moments as they come because I know how things are with each girl can and will change. I was just looking the other day at a couple of pictures from the last time I hung out with my first ATF (who I still know many years later) and lemme tell you time is right up there with death and taxes lol.
Better is relative and it's ok for things to improve over time. There's a lot of feedback that's been given over time (that founder has been very responsive to) that's helped shape this place. The reviews are longer now and the expectations are higher, and generally speaking need to meet a more restrictive criteria to get posted. That's generally ok, but a lot of the details are cribbed from other reviews now so a lot of it is window dressing.
If an experienced club goer walks into a club, declares it shit for time they're in the place, I'm fine with a short review if they can explain what the problem was. Sometimes a club is just having a bad day or a down shift. If someone is writing reviews about the same club over and over I'm also fine with them not rehashing their same description over and over (or copy pasting it for the diehards).
Casuals are writing reviews for free access and to try and share something useful in exchange for the access. For most people it's not a contest, but I'm ok with the people who put in extra effort so long as they keep in mind other people aren't as invested.
"When founder put in review grading that was the best thing he ever did."
A lot of what drove the community voting for reviews was people complaining about the amount of time it took to get reviews published, and for a vocal minority it was about quality. Some reviews were bad but a lot of them were ok and had useful details. That's really the bottom line. I'm ok with the voting system and like being able to comment on reviews as I vote, but I don't vote on them that often because others have that covered.
I don't think so had an account on Z-bone but did read it, unless I had to make a login to read. Going back even further, besides Subraman (and kinda me) do we still have anyone around from the usenet days on ASS-C? I wasn't wallanon back then and actually don't remember my old handle anymore lol, but I was only really lurking back in those days.
—
Some of the best posters ever on TUSCL - except for DougS and MisterGuy. I mostly steered clear of Doug’s attacks but did get tired of how he went after some people. And MisterGuy is probably my most disliked. For me, he was worse than Icee and SJG.
Geez, getting old can be a bitch on one’s memory
DougS I don't really remember, but there's been plenty of quality contributors who weren't posting about topics or clubs I was paying attention to. When I looked the account up his stomping ground was Midwest and he was a Hip Hugger and Brad's Brass Flamingo guy in their heyday.
I only got to the Brass Flamingo once (not in its heyday) and could see what the fuss was about.
Juice. IMO the best member ever here. Who else would post selfies of themselves at work on an anonymous strip club message board and make rap songs making fun of other members. Annoying at times and a lot of his jokes missed the mark but when he was funny, he was REALLY funny.
Johnsmith69. The attorney that was having a midlife crisis, wrote a review of him having sex with his wife, and used TUSCL posts as his own personal diary. Pure entertainment.
Trolls:
Lrryfisherman aka clackport. Probably the biggest toolbox ever, last I saw he still wrote raviews but steers clear of the discussion page.
SJG - words can’t describe.
Icee - someone who deep down has some real issues, wouldn’t shock me if it was Dougster the entire time, unlikely but you never know.
Underrated:
Silkypants - dude is an encyclopedia on Midwest strip clubs.
Woodstock - deserves to be in the hall of fame solely because he hangs out with Founder.
There was a stripper that used to post on here about +/- 10 years ago. She posted photos on here from the neck down and her body was damn near a 10. She was really funny and one day she posted that she won’t be on here for awhile because she was going to prison soon. Who was that? I’m trying to remember I think she lived in the north west like Oregon or Washington.
nj_pete didn't know this, but his writing style is among those I modeled mine after when I first started posting reviews way back when.
I’m coming up on 14 years soon. Will I make it to 20? Seems like it. There aren’t very many new topics left to be covered and the board is more quiet (and more enjoyable) with most of the trolls evicted. While bumping the old threads is annoying and I don’t condone it, some of the new comments to those old threads are interesting.
Two dancers that no longer post but I wish they did were bj99 and wiffle waffle.
I also remember an early version of the site back in the mid 1990's. I'm thinking 94-95... Very early WWW days. Hosted by a server with "paranoia" in the name if I recall. My friends and I used it before work trips. Good old days.
Kidding, I did the same exact thing, fresh out of college on the road for work, I went to TUSCL looking for stripclubs before people even knew what amazon.com and eBay.com were.
Not ready for assisted living yet. But making a note to find one that provides van service to the local clubs.
I had a couple years of work under my belt by the time "the Internet" became commonplace. Boy did productivity drop... And the stuff we viewed at work - you'd get fired for sure now.
During Covid, I had a lot of time on my hands and enjoyed talking about places I couldn't go to for a few months. I'm strictly just going to strip clubs these days.
shadowcat
ArtCollege
shailynn
DandyDan
nj_pete
steve3000
mike710
Who else is still loitering in the parking lot?
When that went away, I started writing reviews. I've only written for about half of the clubs I've visited.
I was one of the first to have a rating system averaging stage dancing and LD cost for overall value.
Chandler joined 2002 logged in this month
I know 3 more at 19 years.
In a way I see that sentiment as good thing, because it implies inclusiveness in a forum that's often accused of being unwelcoming. But I don't necessarily agree with it. The people who've been around the longest don't usually talk about it, which is why I thought to ask. And other than Mighty Quinn all the 20 year guys have usernames I recognized right away. MQ hasn't really been on the boards much and clubs in a part of the country I don't get to much so that's why.
On the participation front, there's a difference between participating and contributing. Some people can mistake always having something to say for having something worth saying. My preference is breadth and depth over volume. One complaint I see over and over again is the TUSCL board has run out of hobby topics to talk about, when most dudes here are probably lurking and never going to dive deep enough to swim beneath the surface level on the boards.
How many ways can even the most verbose among us write about the customer 101 basics, yet another strip club visit, or "I got laid this week"? A lot of the best conversations happen off the boards in PMs and other channels, but in all seriousness some of you guys (especially the noobs) should be asking more meaningful questions that will help you in this hobby while some of the old guard is still here and inclined to help out.
I'd vote for a forum of people who aren't friends but have interesting conversations any day over a bunch of dudes kissing each other's asses laughing at the same tired stories and jokes. I've made friends here, so I'm not saying there isn't value in that.
However, in almost two decades of reading here there only seems to be two default modes of discussion in most threads ("yes I agree" or "you're an idiot") on the boards. We're better than that and the Hobby is supposed to be fun.