Names or Explicitness

I think a description of service is more useful overall. I don't really want to read a Penthouse Letters account of what happened, but knowing that a PL paid $200 for $100 for FS to a cuban chick is useful information. A name without a description isn't terribly useful to someone who isn't a club regular who would recognize the name. But even if you wrote, "I took Violet, a hot cuban chick with big tits, to VIP and had a great time" it's pretty vague. For one PL a "truly hot experience" might be DFK, face fucking and multiple positions while for another it might be a really nice grind while he gropes her tits.

Either choice is better than a lot of the crap reviews I've been rejecting lately.

For a club I'm not familiar with, description of service is more helpful. For a club I'm familiar with, I'd much rather have the name

We don’t need no stinkin’ names. Explicit without names is much more valuable information than names with a generic description of “fun,“ “a great time,“ or “I left very happy,“ which means different things to different folks. I guess if all you want out of a strip club visit is a good grind and maybe some titty groping, then it really doesn’t matter. But if you like extras, this is valuable information, especially for someone who uses TUSCL to decide what clubs to visit when traveling. But even then, very explicit details, like how many and what positions, or how deep she goes, or how many milliliters of cum oozed out of your used condom, aren’t really necessary. Whether or not you got a BJ or FS tells us all we need to know. Oh, and how much you “tipped” would be nice to know. This can vary dramatically from city to city, club to club, and girl to girl, of course, but it gives you a ballpark idea for discussion purposes, if you find a suitable candidate to keep you company in VIP for a little while. And I can figure out who is a suitable candidate all by myself.

Depends on the situation and the club. Sometimes names are fine, sometimes acts but sometimes you have to write around giving either.

Yeah let’s all be explicit and get TUSCL shut down. Great idea, idiots.

I don't need either.

I certainly don't need or care about names. I don't care specifically about what chick you did what with at all. No need to describe her specifically or name her. I'm not gonna look for that specific girl when I go to the club. I don't care about your exploits, I only need it to be explicit enough for me to determine if extras are the norm or not. The fact that you hit it from the back doesn't interest me at all.

I'd rather you describe the lineup in general. I want to know Club A has nearly all Cuban chicks, mostly thicker and with fake tits and ass, vs Club B which has mostly trailer trashy white girls with tattoo's and piercings, vs Club C which has mostly black girls, vs Club D which has mostly skinny girls with small but natural tits, etc. That's 1000x more useful to me than the fact that the chick you chose was a Cuban with big titties or that her name was Violet. Similarly, I'm more interested in knowing you paid $75 for the room at 250 for the girl. That way I have a better idea of club and market rates.

I care about the club, not the girl. Sure, the girls are what make the club, but I'm not gonna go to the club for one specific girl based on a review. If you're going to a club I reviewed looking for the chick I saw, you're likely to fail or be disappointment. Odds are she won't be there or she'll be busy, there might be another girl with the same or very similar name that causes a mixup, or you'll disagree with my assessment of her hotness or personality. But if you go to the club I said has mostly thick plastic chicks who'll fuck for $225 for 3 songs or the one I said has mostly thin natural girls who'll do what they promise for $300 for 15 minutes, you're pretty likely to find something similar.

My preference is dancer names with physical descriptions, and then an explicit services/price comment that is not tied to any particular name.

This is simply not an issue relative to the SoCal clubs I frequent since 1) every LEO and local government already knows what goes on in every club, and 2) statements on this site are not admissible evidence. I acknowledge other parts of the country may have different standards.

But there’s too many pearl-clutchers and people who can’t follow rules on this site, so abuses will always happen and agreement to a standard will never happen. So let’s just carry on and give this dead horse topic a rest.

Dolfan: "I only need it to be explicit enough for me to determine if extras are the norm or not."

^ That, in a nutshell, is what I look for in a review.

the only words i really need to see to get me interested to go to a club are: pawg, latin, action, condoms, condom wrappers in the trash can or in toilet. names don't mean shit - my experiences with a tracy, mirasol, or brittney chances are will vary differently with many others.

I don’t need either, but since coded words are pretty easy to decode, I’ll take explicit over names paired up with “billy joel”, “left relieved”, “checked her tonsils”, etc. you’re not fooling anyone with that stuff.

I’m with the guys that just want basic club intel, I don’t care what you did with Barbie I don’t even care what your personal preference is, all I look for is did you have fun what the girls look like, how much did you spend, and are there enough girls there. If I have that data, I’ll figure the rest out easily all by myself.

I'm not telling you the names of my favorites. They may not be your type and if they are I don't want the competition. It's enough to know what is available in a club without knowing the names of specific dancers.

In the review I don't mind adding in a name w/o specific acts; I would like our fellow members to have a good experience. If I DO allude to xtra fun I include a "PM me if you'd like a name" and even in those messages I do not get overly explicit.

I don't get to the same club often enough to be possessive of a dancer; hell, it's rare when I "bump" into them a second time.

Concur with 25 that I do like to know what's available in any particular club.... so I don't get slapped or thrown out.

Wow. I can't remember the last time this was discussed and we got to watch everyone not change their minds.

Except that's not true. It was 8 days ago.

https://tuscl.net/discussion/83486

Yeah anytime you want to name someone or give details - please refer to this excellent point below bubbleyum made the other day. If you can’t understand her point then you probably don’t need to be on a raview board. I didn’t say you have to AGREE with it, but at least be competent enough to understand it.

“^so, extras are technically defined as anything more than a dance. And given that most US states have a no contact law regarding sexually oriented businesses, most strip clubs are technically extras clubs in that they allow touching of some kind. Extras are known for being more explicitly sexual in nature, but they technically really are anything more than a dance. A dancer merely just sitting on your lap is considered an extra in the eyes of the law. Just throwing that out there as food for thought.

I 100% agree with and support of not linking names to extras. It's a great way to get a girl fired or jumped. So many customers desperately seek out extras, yet can't just simply respect that dancer that serviced him afterward by just leaving her name out in a review“ - bubbleyum

Cause tbh I don’t even know sometimes. You don’t want to put a dancer out there. Or put a club out there either. But you also don’t want to write boring, and vanilla useless review either. I’m just feeling out a consensus which we don’t have on this issue. Looks at this thread it’s all over the place. It’s not all black and whit either there this grey area that it’s not always so clear sometimes.

^ The previous dozen or so threads on this topic didn't create a consensus. This one won't as well.

I can live with that. Because it's pretty obvious that this is a topic where there will always be disagreement and no true consensus.

It’s kind of irrelevant in the South Florida market where it’s assumed that lap dances involve heavy groping and VIP means FS.
We would never see a review that says “I paid $300 and took a hot cuban to the 3 song VIP at DD Pompano where she gave me a good grind.” We all know you got FS, CBJ, cleaned up and out the door in about 6 minutes.

I've gone to making up the dancer names.

"extras are technically defined as"

^ Anything following that is inherently wrong. There is no agreed upon technical definition of an extra. There are countless threads on here debating what exactly constitutes an "extra." Further, no where is it written that anything illegal constitutes an extra or vice versa.

And even if you buy into the idea that illegal == extra, in Florida and specifically Palm Beach County contact between an adult entertainer and a customer is not illegal. I'm pretty sure Dade (Miami ) & Broward (Pompano) have no such legal provisions either. The idea that touching a dancers hand or her sitting on a customers lap is "technically" an extra is complete nonsense. I haven't the slightest fucking clue about laws across the country or around the world, but if I had to I'd bet that the Tri-County area in south Florida is not the outlier but we are the norm or at least a large minority.

Don't get me wrong, I don't disagree with her point that calling out a girl for pushing or crossing the line with respect to extras isn't worth doing. I very much agree with it. But that line of logic just doesn't hold up to any scrutiny whatsoever.