Writing a Detailed Review
founder
slip a dollar in her g-string for me
I often get emails from members who have had a review rejected for lack of details.
The emails usually always say the same thing.
"I provided lots of details"
"Go Fuck Yourself and your stupid website"
"These reviewers are assholes"
Here is an actual example, and my response.
Hopefully it will help members write a more detailed review.
------ auto response from rejected review:
Hi xxxxxxxxxx
We're sorry, but your review of Club Fred was not published for the following reasons:
joewebber said: Not Enough Club Details
MrEddyG said: Shill Review or Club Ad
georgmicrodong said: Not Enough Club Details
yankeez4lif said: Not Enough Club Details
Please feel free to correct and resubmit your review.
Text of Review:
stopped in after the first day of hunting. Club Fred has added high tables along the wall and floor lighting along the wall. It was $10 entrance fee. Dancer's setup is still the same tables setup in a rectangle with the girls dancing inside of tables. You had to call to let them know you were at the door. This is a BYOB club. Some food and soda is sold.
There were 6 dancers and all were friendly. 3 of them were blondes. My 2 favorites were Ava and Cece. Ava was tall with small round nipples and pubic hair. Cece was a tall blonde with B cup tits and waxed pussy. The other 4 were a variety of tats, piercings and fake tits.
The crowd enjoyed themselves. There was 1 bachelor party there and also 1 couple. Fred's is very accommondating to female guests.
I was there for 3 hours and spent about $35. I hope when I go back again that Ava is still dancing there.
------ response from member to me:
I provided plenty of club details. These people say the same things of every review. No wander people do not supply reviews of clubs anymore. This was my second review of Club Fred for last Saturday.
------- My Response to member
Hi xxxxxxxx,
Sorry for the delayed response. Don't take it personally. Your review
lacks details. Here are some questions I have after reading it.
What were you hunting for?
What is this "wall" that they added tables along? Does this club only
have one wall?
You had to call them to let them know you're at the door? Like the
front door? Did you have to use your cell phone? Or was it an
intercom?
What booze can you bring in? Do they allow hard alcohol and are
mixers provided?
Ava had round pubic hair? That's actually pretty detailed. :)
The other 4 dancers were inanimate objects? I can only assume one was
a tat, one was a piercing, and the other two were fake tits?
How do you know the crowd enjoyed themselves? Did they tell you? Or
did you observe some detail that you're not telling us?
There was a couple, and they were very accommodating to the female
guest. How so?
3 hours and only $35? Minus $10 for the entrance fee? So you spent
$25? That's about one lap dance and a tip. Is that what you spent
your money on?
I hope this criticism is taken constructively and you get your reviews
published in the future.
Founder
The Ultimate Strip Club List
https://www.tuscl.net
The emails usually always say the same thing.
"I provided lots of details"
"Go Fuck Yourself and your stupid website"
"These reviewers are assholes"
Here is an actual example, and my response.
Hopefully it will help members write a more detailed review.
------ auto response from rejected review:
Hi xxxxxxxxxx
We're sorry, but your review of Club Fred was not published for the following reasons:
joewebber said: Not Enough Club Details
MrEddyG said: Shill Review or Club Ad
georgmicrodong said: Not Enough Club Details
yankeez4lif said: Not Enough Club Details
Please feel free to correct and resubmit your review.
Text of Review:
stopped in after the first day of hunting. Club Fred has added high tables along the wall and floor lighting along the wall. It was $10 entrance fee. Dancer's setup is still the same tables setup in a rectangle with the girls dancing inside of tables. You had to call to let them know you were at the door. This is a BYOB club. Some food and soda is sold.
There were 6 dancers and all were friendly. 3 of them were blondes. My 2 favorites were Ava and Cece. Ava was tall with small round nipples and pubic hair. Cece was a tall blonde with B cup tits and waxed pussy. The other 4 were a variety of tats, piercings and fake tits.
The crowd enjoyed themselves. There was 1 bachelor party there and also 1 couple. Fred's is very accommondating to female guests.
I was there for 3 hours and spent about $35. I hope when I go back again that Ava is still dancing there.
------ response from member to me:
I provided plenty of club details. These people say the same things of every review. No wander people do not supply reviews of clubs anymore. This was my second review of Club Fred for last Saturday.
------- My Response to member
Hi xxxxxxxx,
Sorry for the delayed response. Don't take it personally. Your review
lacks details. Here are some questions I have after reading it.
What were you hunting for?
What is this "wall" that they added tables along? Does this club only
have one wall?
You had to call them to let them know you're at the door? Like the
front door? Did you have to use your cell phone? Or was it an
intercom?
What booze can you bring in? Do they allow hard alcohol and are
mixers provided?
Ava had round pubic hair? That's actually pretty detailed. :)
The other 4 dancers were inanimate objects? I can only assume one was
a tat, one was a piercing, and the other two were fake tits?
How do you know the crowd enjoyed themselves? Did they tell you? Or
did you observe some detail that you're not telling us?
There was a couple, and they were very accommodating to the female
guest. How so?
3 hours and only $35? Minus $10 for the entrance fee? So you spent
$25? That's about one lap dance and a tip. Is that what you spent
your money on?
I hope this criticism is taken constructively and you get your reviews
published in the future.
Founder
The Ultimate Strip Club List
https://www.tuscl.net
Got something to say?
Start your own discussion
58 comments
As a dancer, the fact he mentions he stopped there after a day of hunting is VERY relevant and good information. At least in my biased opinion. Then for everything else, there was just enough info that puts it as okay as a review. Yes it could have been better.
If it was a club I was interested in, I would have followed up with more questions in the comments.
Personally, I’m all for giving some slack, because it’s a club that doesn’t get reviewed often. Vivide, Baby Dolls Dallas, Club Desire RI, Hong Kong in Tijuana— yeah absolutely demand the highest possible review standards.
I also think some slack should be given to people with a lower review count. If one digs through the reviews of some prominent posters on this board, and read their very first club review ever submitted, it likely wouldn’t pass muster today. And if they interact with enough other site members, then they tend to figure out what other people think is important and fall in line.
Like the Club Desire crowd always liking to list the entire lineup of dancers on a Tuesday afternoon, and that SpongeBob dancer was wearing a yellow bikini and had an obnoxious laugh and provides great vip service and that Squidward dancer was wearing brown and had no bottoms in and was being a bitch. I think that practice just happened organically because people decided that was important and others figure it out when they start participating.
Trade offs for quality and quantity of reviews is its own pitfall though.
I'll also let a review go if it shows a good effort. Questions can be asked and pointers can be given in the comments.
Another issue is that there's no natural connection between "guy who likes strip clubs" and "guy who knows how to write". And for a lot of guys who aren't good writers, it's a lot of work to be coherent with the written word. Writing is a skill, and not everyone has that skill.
I would never expect anyone else to write reviews similar to Papi or Oldwhiteguy. It's nice when that happens, but it's an unrealistic expectation from a broad range of people.
That's something that definitely needs more explanation. It sounds like an employee training session or a college classroom. No stage? No bar? Even BYOB spots usually have a bar where they'll keep your beer cold or whatever.
I'm usually not a stickler that needs every single box checked for a review to be approved, but I at least want to imagine what the place looks like. "Tables in a rectangle" creates more questions than answers.
And what the fuck did you do there for three hours?
Also, the reviewer isn't shown. I would be in favor of showing some info about the user, like their number of reviewed clubs, number of reviews, last review date, joined date, something like that. But I guess we don't want to show the actual name to avoid the cliques and trolls from getting approve or reject happy.
SJG
I have made exceptions to reviews of international clubs that have few if any reviews.
SJG
If reviewer is that careless HOW he writes, what he writes is suspect as well.
I’ve never been to this club. It sounds like someone’s house. You either ring a doorbell or call ahead to get in. Then when you are in, you sit at a table facing another table with more dudes in camo?
How do you spend 3 hours staring at dancers and dudes in camo - and spend $35? I understand it’s BYOB - but that’s cheap.
In case anyone wanted to know - I find dancers with horseshoe shaped nipples to be the luckiest! As long as the horseshoes are pointing up - so all the luck doesn’t run out of them.
a good review stands out if it can only describe the club being reviewed.
if the review says "stopped by PL's" girls were hot. bought a drink. got a dance. left."
we need details. demographic makeup of the dancers and clientele. music. cost of dances. cost of drinks. is vip private? rate the dancers' looks? was it slow? did you have to wait a long time before you got a dance?
there's just a number of different pieces of information that a reader wants to know about a club, and a generic three sentences doesn't cut it.
Some sentences, paragraphs don't.
Or, if you just want to make a simple, short trip report about a club, go to that club's TUSCL listing page and post it to a club "Discussion". Those discussion threads have no adjudicators and now show up in "Front Room" discussion feed (and in the "My Feed" newsfeed for anyone who "follows" that club). Just don't be a dickhead and connect dancers by name to extras.
But if you want free access to benefits that would otherwise cost money, then make an effort and follow the review guidelines.
I just went to unpublished reviews. The first four that came up are each 3 lines long. Did not even bother to read them or vote.
A well written review with a lot of details can read like an advertisement trying to cover all bases. And a well written review doesn't mean it is accurate; it means the reviewer writes well and may have a vivid imagination.
For infrequently reviewed clubs, it's important for me to know whether the reviewer had a good time and good time should not be code for extras.
My 2 cents.
https://tuscl.net/review.php?id=366470
If a club reviewer can't write a review that crosses the finish line while those above can, then the problem isn't the judging process...
With inflation and Kung Flu, prices are changing weekly so I want to be able to compare the prices I get from a dancer to the previous reviews. This is a money centered hobby.
That's why San Jose Creep has never written a review!
The more I read your posts, the more I like SJG and Icee. You really are the dumbest fucking imbecile on this whole board.
1. Review Rejected
2. Review Approved and posted, gets reviews for the minor clubs which don't get many, and some reviews are important as they just tell you the place is operating. Best not to have to reject these sorts of reviews. But this does not get the author VIP Status
3. Super Review Approved, reaches to your high bar standard and gets published and gets author a month or two of VIP status. Most reviewers will probably try to write these Super Reviews.
SJG
One humble quibble, though: I don't quite understand this site's emphasis on a club's physical details such as layout, size, etc. Those don't change very often, so you run the risk of reviews getting repetitive. And when a club does undergo a major remodel, it seems like the reviewers are all over it without prompting. That said, overall I love the site and rely on it regularly.
My over arching need to know: the shape of the bar!!!
Is it a rectangle? A circle? A pentagon?
That’s important shit.
What are you going to do with the minutes you spend adding putting info ? Find a cure for cancer?
Stop rejecting reviews. There is something good in each review.
Rejecting reviews makes members not write them anymore. Not all people can write the same way. I.e. Papi Chulo summation skills are horrible. He writes articles with redundancy after redundancy. Yet some members get info out of them. Some people like to talk about their preferences like "I like red bull with vodka". Its all good. Stop the cancel bullshit culture here. Let my people free.