Naming names

19 comments

• jackslash

  •

  5 years ago

  Naming strippers who do extras is stupid. It is also stupid to state you received extras in a certain club.
• Call.Me.Ishmael

  •

  5 years ago

  I never connect dancers by name to specific acts. I reject reviews that do.
  
  I happily name ROBs.
• NJBalla

  •

  5 years ago

  Yeah thats common SC etiquette. Leave extras to the private messages. But forums are rarely the reason clubs get raided and dancers get charged. Cops arent idiots and it doesnt take too much for them to get the information. Clubs get raided because of drugs, problems with locals, or problems with local politicians. In my experience cops and FBI agents are some of the biggest clubbers.
• Warrior15

  •

  5 years ago

  I would Reject it if it were unpublished. If it's in the Daily Reviews, then I'll call out the writer of the Review. Don't name names then extras are involved.
• Papi_Chulo

  •

  5 years ago

  The guidelines state not to use dancer-names in conjunction with extras and most on this board follow that guideline.
  
  Perhaps being too explicit about extras may not be the absolutely best thing, but I think the pros outweigh the cons in that not mentioning it leaves out crucial info for those not in the know, and as NJBalla mentioned cops usually seem to go after a club for some specific reason vs "they didn't know what was going on until they read TUSCL" - plus sanitizing reviews will make them less-fun to read.
• shadowcat

  •

  5 years ago

  I think that most members realize that it is not good policy and don't do it. And most members are rejecting review that do implicate dancers.
  
  Unfortunately USAsexguide located in the Netherlands is not so thoughtful. Members not only mention names but post pornographic photos to go along with it. I am not registered there so I cannot post and object. The site is moderated and I would probably get my posts deleted.
• goldmongerATL

  •

  5 years ago

  Well, I recently mentioned a girl I took OTC for the purpose of letting people know well, she did OTC. We just talked and then fell asleep. Honest! It is hard to imply OTC was available or done. If you are going to provide that info for the benefit of others, you pretty much have to state it. I got called on it by one review reviewer.
  
  You can describe a "liberal" lap dance, but describing extras are another thing. If you know the club, you know what a good or bad VIP is. If you say she gave a great VIP, at a low mileage club it might mean you got to pet the kitty. At Follies it means you were balls deep.
  
  
• Call.Me.Ishmael

  •

  5 years ago

  shadowcat said "Unfortunately USAsexguide located in the Netherlands is not so thoughtful. Members not only mention names but post pornographic photos to go along with it. I am not registered there so I cannot post and object. The site is moderated and I would probably get my posts deleted."
  
  They not only allow it, they encourage it. Following the Cheaters scandal, I posted that members should consider that the site was getting a lot of scrutiny and be circumspect about specifics. My post got deleted and I was put "on probation" for discouraging the sharing of information.
  
  I mostly stopped posting at USASG once I found TUSCL.
• Call.Me.Ishmael

  •

  5 years ago

  Here's the other thing to keep in mind... It's not just a law enforcement thing.
  
  It's also possible to get a dancer in hot water with management if she's breaking the rules. We know that, in some cases, club managers / owners are on here.
  
  But I think the bigger threat is local media and their occasional fixation on strip clubs. We already know it's not hard to publish a vague review and get VIP access. Locally, journalists *love* posting screen captures of explicit posts to terrify the civilian population.
  
  And *that's* what actually gets law enforcement to pay attention to your favorite strip club.
• Jascoi

  •

  5 years ago

  personally i like names and what they do. 😁
  
  HOWEVER... 🙄
  
  it is better not to get the girl in trouble.😳
• datinman

  •

  5 years ago

  Oh, but if you use code words like Billy Joel or Frank Sinatra no one could possible figure it out.
  
  I have often wanted to do a review where I said "Sinnamon gave me a Engelbert Humperdinck for $$.45 roses." just to fuck with people.
• Longball300

  •

  5 years ago

  You can certainly imply a level of fun and connect that to a name without being specific. Us mongers will get the idea..😛
• Clubber

  •

  5 years ago

  If you read that here, then enough TUSCLers approved it. Sems many that approve or reject don't have a grasp of the guidelines. They specifically state:
  "Be honest. You can go into detail of the private dances. Just be careful with names if it may get your ATF in trouble."
  
  Doesn't take a rocket scientist to understand that, but those that approve "naming" reviews seem to not grasp it.
• goldmongerATL

  •

  5 years ago

  What that tells me is if it is not going to get her in trouble with the club, you can use her name with a certain amount of detail of what went on.
• Call.Me.Ishmael

  •

  5 years ago

  GoldmongerATL said "What that tells me is if it is not going to get her in trouble with the club, you can use her name with a certain amount of detail of what went on."
  
  Except you can never be sure that it's not going to get her in trouble with the club, especially if management changes or in the aftermath of a bust.
  
  Also, I don't want to see my explicit post on the local news during those times when the news media decides to solve the problem of horny guys in strip clubs...
• boomer79

  •

  5 years ago

  I think there are plenty of ways to hint that extras might be available without saying it. You don’t have to be explicit. Of course there are places like Follies where some people are very straight forward. I guess they think that if anyone doesn’t know they just don’t want to.
  
  I’ve also found there is a lot of YMMV with extras. I’ve been turned down by girls I know do extras and later gotten them. Sometimes it’s about trust and comfort. Most clubs are not brothels but we all know things do happen. Personally I wouldn’t post about specific extras other than to say that I was happy with the experience or the girl was honest or straight forward. What I would definitely say though is if a girl said she would do something and didn’t.
• Papi_Chulo

  •

  5 years ago

  Beyond not naming girls by name b/c they could potentially get in trouble in the club, I just think it's as much out of courtesy to not announce it to the World Wide Web what Bambi does in VIP - I'm sure most of us would not like getting outed to the world w.r.t. what we specifically do in the clubs.
  
  Some on TUSCL treat TUSCL as they would an escort-site where an escort is individually reviewed and every detail about what she does or doesn't do is expected to be posted - TUSCL is not an escort review site nor necessarily a dancer-review site, it's about describing what the clubs have to offer and although extras are a part of it it's not the only function of TUSCL as it is for an escort-site - for me not naming names w.r.t. extras is more out of courtesy to the girls providing those services.
• skibum609

  •

  5 years ago

  As a lawyer I know a lot of police officers and when they are being honest with you, this is their take on crime solving: About 10% happens in front of us and the other 90% is usually the result of someone ratting out someone else.
• Muddy

  •

  5 years ago

  It just takes a little common sense and decency to not do something like that. Fucking animals. They contribute to raids and the decline of strip clubs.