Naming names
gawker
Older than dirt
I was just reading a review of a club in New York and the reviewer said he was going to see a dancer who he named. He ran through the dance options, one of which was 30 minutes in a room with no camera. The narrative continues as he chooses that option then describes how he received a Bare back blow job with more available if he’d had a condom.
I’m not a prude, am not offended, but I worry about a club that I know that was recently closed with 3 dancers charged with prostitution. In a city which has had a very liberal attitude towards strip clubs.
I recently read an article where a few dancers were arrested for lewd and lascivious conduct and the “crime” was talking to an undercover officer about sex. If talking about it is a crime I’m not going to be eligible for parole until I’m 112.
I’ve never really worried about law enforcement but for whatever reason, I’m seeing more and more intrusion to my favorite pastime by John Law, I think there are many of us who need a reminder to use euphemisms or hints rather than naming dancers who have been especially generous with their favors or even describing sex acts in a given club. OTC is a different story. Agree?
I’m not a prude, am not offended, but I worry about a club that I know that was recently closed with 3 dancers charged with prostitution. In a city which has had a very liberal attitude towards strip clubs.
I recently read an article where a few dancers were arrested for lewd and lascivious conduct and the “crime” was talking to an undercover officer about sex. If talking about it is a crime I’m not going to be eligible for parole until I’m 112.
I’ve never really worried about law enforcement but for whatever reason, I’m seeing more and more intrusion to my favorite pastime by John Law, I think there are many of us who need a reminder to use euphemisms or hints rather than naming dancers who have been especially generous with their favors or even describing sex acts in a given club. OTC is a different story. Agree?
19 comments
I happily name ROBs.
Perhaps being too explicit about extras may not be the absolutely best thing, but I think the pros outweigh the cons in that not mentioning it leaves out crucial info for those not in the know, and as NJBalla mentioned cops usually seem to go after a club for some specific reason vs "they didn't know what was going on until they read TUSCL" - plus sanitizing reviews will make them less-fun to read.
Unfortunately USAsexguide located in the Netherlands is not so thoughtful. Members not only mention names but post pornographic photos to go along with it. I am not registered there so I cannot post and object. The site is moderated and I would probably get my posts deleted.
You can describe a "liberal" lap dance, but describing extras are another thing. If you know the club, you know what a good or bad VIP is. If you say she gave a great VIP, at a low mileage club it might mean you got to pet the kitty. At Follies it means you were balls deep.
They not only allow it, they encourage it. Following the Cheaters scandal, I posted that members should consider that the site was getting a lot of scrutiny and be circumspect about specifics. My post got deleted and I was put "on probation" for discouraging the sharing of information.
I mostly stopped posting at USASG once I found TUSCL.
It's also possible to get a dancer in hot water with management if she's breaking the rules. We know that, in some cases, club managers / owners are on here.
But I think the bigger threat is local media and their occasional fixation on strip clubs. We already know it's not hard to publish a vague review and get VIP access. Locally, journalists *love* posting screen captures of explicit posts to terrify the civilian population.
And *that's* what actually gets law enforcement to pay attention to your favorite strip club.
HOWEVER... 🙄
it is better not to get the girl in trouble.😳
I have often wanted to do a review where I said "Sinnamon gave me a Engelbert Humperdinck for $$.45 roses." just to fuck with people.
"Be honest. You can go into detail of the private dances. Just be careful with names if it may get your ATF in trouble."
Doesn't take a rocket scientist to understand that, but those that approve "naming" reviews seem to not grasp it.
Except you can never be sure that it's not going to get her in trouble with the club, especially if management changes or in the aftermath of a bust.
Also, I don't want to see my explicit post on the local news during those times when the news media decides to solve the problem of horny guys in strip clubs...
I’ve also found there is a lot of YMMV with extras. I’ve been turned down by girls I know do extras and later gotten them. Sometimes it’s about trust and comfort. Most clubs are not brothels but we all know things do happen. Personally I wouldn’t post about specific extras other than to say that I was happy with the experience or the girl was honest or straight forward. What I would definitely say though is if a girl said she would do something and didn’t.
Some on TUSCL treat TUSCL as they would an escort-site where an escort is individually reviewed and every detail about what she does or doesn't do is expected to be posted - TUSCL is not an escort review site nor necessarily a dancer-review site, it's about describing what the clubs have to offer and although extras are a part of it it's not the only function of TUSCL as it is for an escort-site - for me not naming names w.r.t. extras is more out of courtesy to the girls providing those services.