Would you rather fuck a 9.5 OTC for $500. The sex is incredible, no complaints
or
You can fuck a 7.5 OTC for $250, sex is just as incredible as the first option.
No, because not only do you have to consider the 9.5, but the fact that you're paying 250$ for a 2.5 difference ,.esp.when personality can compensate for some of that 2.5 difference ..even if it can't, paying 250 for a 2.5 difference is crazy ..7.5 is cool.
This thread reminds me of a Quagmire quote when Peter was wondering how to raise $50,000.
"You could whore yourself out to a thousand women for fifty bucks each, or fifty fat women for a thousand bucks each. Fat women need it too, but they gotta pay!"
Interesting. If I had a gun to my head and had to choose one or the other, I would take the 9.5 for $500.
But if these were my only two options in a normal club setting, odds are good that I would walk out empty handed. If I am paying a real number for sex, I'm not going to blow good money on anything below an 8, but $500 is too much, in my view, to blow on a single sexual encounter with any girl. The reality is that I would probably move on to the next club and find something 8+ that is coming in at a more reasonable price.
It is like buying steak at the meat market. If I make the choice to cook steak (paying a stripper for sex) instead of buying far less expensive chicken or pork (say, jerking off to a cam site or porn), then I had better be getting a damned good piece of meat. If I am forced to choose between a $7 per lb top sirloin or a $15 per pound ribeye, I'm going to take the ribeye every time. But with that said, the odds are good that I'll look for a better deal on rib-eyes from another good source rather than pay $15 per lb for a single serving of steak that I have to cook myself, so if those were my only two choices I'd likely walk out of the store without the steak.
I think I need to clarify...that steak example comes from someone with a family of 5, so $15 per pound steak for the family is somewhere close to a $50 purchase for a single meal that we still have to cook ourselves. If I was single, like many of you, and could just swing into a market and buy a 1 lb steak for the grill for dinner, that analogy might not hold up quite as well.
I was thinking for some of you that no matter how hot the girl is you wouldn’t be willing to pay $500 for sex. So in that case you would go for the 7.5, because 7.5 is still hot and you save $250.
In my case I want the finer things in life haha, so if the finer things cost significant more, then so be it. You only live once, and 9.5’s don’t come around often.
Larry posted: "I was thinking for some of you that no matter how hot the girl is you wouldn’t be willing to pay $500 for sex. So in that case you would go for the 7.5, because 7.5 is still hot and you save $250."
Where your theories fell apart were in the assumptions that we would: (1) never pay $500 under any circumstance just because we normally won't; and (2) gladly settle for lesser talent when better talent was on the table. In order to validate your theories, you tried to force us into a binary choice when. In reality, our choices are more dynamic, so we know that we don't have to pay $500 to get a hot girl OR have necessarily to settle and, if one night goes sideways, there is always the next night.
Strip clubs are already an expensive entertainment option and there are plenty of cheaper options out there if busting a nut was the sole concern. Your hypothesis would likely get a lot more confirmation support on a board like USASG then it is going to get on a strip club customer site. A lot of those fuckers on USASG would gladly put a bag over her head and ignore the track marks on her arm if a girl will just let them stick their dicks in for $60.
Actually BBP, I was criticizing larry's poorly thought out hypothesis. The fact that SC junkies are addicts of one sort or another is a completely separate issue. ;)
I mean, 7.5 is still a decent rating on the scale, but 9.5 is hard to find in my town.
...
Fuck it. Going with the 9.5. I've got a hefty savings account.
I've never fucked less than an 8. Prices for both hypotheticals ($250 & $500) are a little over my budget so it's all academic. I'd wait until a 9 showed up in my budget or I'd wait until my budget grows. My financials are improving day by day.
Assuming the event is "just as incredible" which is a little hard to equate since the visual component is such a large factor when "rating" an encounter........ I would go with the 7.5, wait a week and then have the $250 to ring her up again for round 2!
yesterday afternoon I had the pleasure of enjoying a 19-year-old girl who is an absolute gorgeous 10 top to bottom … One of the very few absolutely perfect looking women I have ever seen... I saw her in the club dancing on the main stage and after her set we went up into the hotel... honestly... it was a trophy fuck that did not touch all the bases that I like... no BJ and no going down on her… ( she said "I don't like that") but still what I spent it was worth it! it was less than half of what the original post suggested for a price.
37 comments
Latest
"You could whore yourself out to a thousand women for fifty bucks each, or fifty fat women for a thousand bucks each. Fat women need it too, but they gotta pay!"
But if these were my only two options in a normal club setting, odds are good that I would walk out empty handed. If I am paying a real number for sex, I'm not going to blow good money on anything below an 8, but $500 is too much, in my view, to blow on a single sexual encounter with any girl. The reality is that I would probably move on to the next club and find something 8+ that is coming in at a more reasonable price.
It is like buying steak at the meat market. If I make the choice to cook steak (paying a stripper for sex) instead of buying far less expensive chicken or pork (say, jerking off to a cam site or porn), then I had better be getting a damned good piece of meat. If I am forced to choose between a $7 per lb top sirloin or a $15 per pound ribeye, I'm going to take the ribeye every time. But with that said, the odds are good that I'll look for a better deal on rib-eyes from another good source rather than pay $15 per lb for a single serving of steak that I have to cook myself, so if those were my only two choices I'd likely walk out of the store without the steak.
Good topic though. Too funny. :)
LOL.
In my case I want the finer things in life haha, so if the finer things cost significant more, then so be it. You only live once, and 9.5’s don’t come around often.
As I write that joke, I think about how fugly you have to be to be a 1.5. New thread coming.
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/…
Where your theories fell apart were in the assumptions that we would: (1) never pay $500 under any circumstance just because we normally won't; and (2) gladly settle for lesser talent when better talent was on the table. In order to validate your theories, you tried to force us into a binary choice when. In reality, our choices are more dynamic, so we know that we don't have to pay $500 to get a hot girl OR have necessarily to settle and, if one night goes sideways, there is always the next night.
Strip clubs are already an expensive entertainment option and there are plenty of cheaper options out there if busting a nut was the sole concern. Your hypothesis would likely get a lot more confirmation support on a board like USASG then it is going to get on a strip club customer site. A lot of those fuckers on USASG would gladly put a bag over her head and ignore the track marks on her arm if a girl will just let them stick their dicks in for $60.
...
Fuck it. Going with the 9.5. I've got a hefty savings account.
Seems reasonable to me...
The rates are pretty low already - so I’d say $75 for the room and call it even at $325 for several hours of bliss with a 7.5 - leaning towards an 8.