1) She would charge a foolish GPS rate and there is nothing that justifies that unless you would get off banging the pres's side bitch or wanted to brag.
2) She is without a doubt being tailed by Republican agents waiting to extort her. Do you want to be the guy getting dragged out of the hotel in your underwear in cuffs with her and have your front page picture that will turn into an immortal meme.
3) She is proven she cant be trusted. Nuff said.
4) while pretty in the day she is a has-been porn star. Plenty of better talent out there.
Stormy Daniels, it says on her Wikipedia page that she is a Republican. Other than the alliance with Donald Trump, how true is this? I don't need to be spending my time arguing with some Republican idiot.
And of GPS rates, it seems like the going one is $1,100 per hour. That was the Heidi Fleiss rate. It was also the rate being used by retired porn star Mimi Miyagi. And you also had to pay that for a preliminary lunch date. So there seems to be some agreement on that number.
And of that $1,100 per hour rate, Mimi Miagi used to advertise that. She is in LV. But if you want it, I'm sure its still available. Just based on her movies, she'd be worth it. Now 44yo.
But, seems that she ran as a Republican to be LV's governor. When she did not get the nomination, she switched to Libertarian.
Well, I see that as a huge negative. The foundation of every society is that it is fair and just. You can't have that when there are huge and increasing wealth gaps, and more and more the operation of the society depends upon Social Darwinism, and when our schools are being turned into charters which the rich would never send their kids to.
So that she would go along with such is a huge negative.
We've talked about before strippers supporting Trump, during the election. People said that it was most.
Well, maybe a huge under the table income does that to people.
But I tell you, from my experience on the ground, most local strippers do not think that way at all. And most of all not in San Francisco. That is a really neat place.
I mean we all came of age in, or in the wake of, the Civil Rights Movement, the Women's Movement, and the Move to End The War in Vietnam. But then when Reagan got elected, it was like none of these hard won victories mattered. So that Daniels and Miyagi go along with this, is a huge negative.
BHF says yes. But most are saying no. For those who say no, how much do her political views, and in general what would seem to be going on between her ears, influence your decision?
I can only speak for myself, but I don't consider a person's political views when deciding with whom to get naked. For example, I'm a libertarian, but I've never even met a female libertarian in person before. Libertarians make up only a teeny tiny fraction of the country, and at least two-thirds of them are male.
If you believe Randommember, then you would have to believe that all the libertarians in the world have somehow congregated here on TUSCL; I strongly disagree, but that's beside the point. If you accept Random's claim that like half the people on the TUSCL board are "randoids," as he calls us, you'll notice that I *still* disagree with most of them at least half the time. My point is that if you hold out for someone who agrees with you all the time, you would be very lonely indeed.
Bear in mind that there are several big disagreements among libertarians: the yokel-tarians vs the cosmo-tarians, the Cato people vs the Ludwig von Mises people, Austrian economics vs the Chicago school of economics, "thin" libertarianism vs "thick" libertarianism, moralists vs consequentialists, the conspiracy theorists vs the skeptics, the issue of abortion, the issue of foreign policy, etc. So we don't even agree amongst ourselves. But Stormy Daniels has a great rack - I would like to think that's the one thing where we all would agree ;) And politics would be a pretty lame reason to not have sex with someone.
If they bring it up, I'll humor them and talk about it but it's not my preference. Before Trump, strippers never used to talk about politics with me. But now it happens all the time. Trump has made politics more accesible to the average man and woman (perhaps because he has the diction and vocabulary of a fifth grader).
I don't think you're gonna get even an over-the-hill porn actress for less than 500. And very few can be had for less than 800. I can remember a time when 2,000 to 2,500 was the going rate. As for Stormy Daniels, I would throw her a thousand.
Yes. I have to pop my extras or p4p cherry sometime. Timing and who she is will make it 'memorable'. Assuming she would agree to standard market rate, otherwise no.
It has nothing to do with politics. Her being Republican, democrat etc doesn't change her pussy, boobs etc. I still say no, and a hell no! Probably because I am early thirties, and she isn't my type at all. Just look at my avatar and banner. Now that's my type!
Not consider political views? Republican - Libertarian is a severe character disorder.
I have no desire to be wasting my time having debates with such persons, or to be giving them money. Even at our local no touching clubs I really don't engage with girls unless we are clearly able to get along.
If the price was right (but it wouldn't be) or if I'd just won the lottery, then sure. But there are other porn stars who I'd rather fuck at GPS rates.
LOL. I'm kinda torn because, unlike most people here, I really do think she's hot. But on the other hand, Donald Trump is pretty skeevy and I wouldn't necessarily want to be someplace where he's already been. But on the other other hand, it would be quite a story that I could always keep with me. So I guess my answer still stands. I would go for it.
"Republican - Libertarian is a severe character disorder. I have no desire to be wasting my time having debates with such persons"
Really? It begs the question of why you spend so much time debating with us here on TUSCL. For my part, I think diversity of political opinion is fine and healthy, and it's part of what makes life interesting.
@bfh totally agree. @shadowcat. Totally agree. Ugly, fat and old. Give me a petite young girl, tight smooth skin. That tattoo is to cover up her stretch marks.
BurlingtonHF - I agree with your comments. I try to not think about the other guys who have fucked the girls who I fuck. It’s easier to block them out as they aren’t actual names - but simply other pl’s.
I think she’s hot and kinda cute (in a milf way). I’d have no problem getting hard for an otc session with her.
It’s odd - in my view - that she fucked Trump without a condom. I thought he was a big germophobe. I guess he makes an exception for porn stars? Lol! It proves he’s a horny dude.
Nope, but for a different reason than she's "washed up" or "has been" or "too expensive" or anything like that. She is still pretty good looking to be honest for a MILF type. The reason is what could I possible give her that 100's if not 1000's of guys haven't already? With no emotional connection at all, my very average member would barely register, and if she's not getting off, it'll just be a finish you as quick as I can type of deal ... for $1000+ Hence my no.
JS69, you are correct sir with your last comment. Now if we only could see pics. of those 2 Russian hookers peeing on him in his hotel in Russia, my bet is they're going to be a lot better looking. Oh, allegedly at his hotel of course ....
Steverox - that video will go for a high price - if it is still around. All these investigations into Russian collusion and the election seems overdone - as nothing motivates an elected official like a golden shower video!
I’m guessing there is a Russian pimp holding that video - and thinking of what price it will bring from Pornhub or Brazzers - or maybe Vivid?
Those Russian whores were probably super hot! It might sound very creepy - but I wonder if they bear a resemblance to Ivanka? Trump seems very enamored with her.
Libertarians claim to have disparity of views with Republicans and with each other, but these are just cover. Really what they all believe in is Social Darwinism.
Most people who parrot libertarian views do so because they think it sounds good, you could even say, sounds sexy.
I listened to a book tour radio interview with this author. I felt that she was not really getting it about the cool sounding appeal of libertarianism, and how it was completely compatible with Social Darwinism. So I wrote a long message and faxed it to her. Next tour interview and she changed her pitch.
So most seem to say no to Stormy Daniels. I only see BHF saying yes. So then is it really her politics, or you could say, that which goes on between her ears, which make you want to reject her?
Most of the strippers I have encountered are not like that, but there have been a few. On in particular I know was fired.
The girl and I have got to like each other. Anatomy and a pretty face alone do not guarantee this.
Even if she is full go, just to get the money, that still does not mean I will comply. And I notice here that most all except BHF have said no.
Daniels, no spring chicken, but still a famous porno star, so the issue would seem to be that which goes on between her ears.
Now what is it, things she has said? The alliance with Trump.
Do people know more about her?
All I know is the alliance with Trump, and that she is listed on wikipedia as "Republican". Curious about her as she is listed as from Louisiana. That is by no means a one party state. But amongst the white population there has been now decades of growing conservatism.
Were I to meet her face to face and talk with her just a bit, I would quickly be able to glean where her head was act, and that would make the decision for me.
BHF seems to think that politics is secondary. I could not disagree more strongly.
Know what, the people who always talk like politics is secondary are clergy. Its how they are able to fill churches with people who might have greatly disparate views. They replace politics with talk about "God". And that type of "God" is always always always an idol.
Saying the politics is secondary is an extremely effective kind of conservative politics. It is like trying to claim your own separate peace in a war for our nation's survival. Religion is an opiate.
Recently on a people finder site I ran across a definite listing for a GF of decades ago, and she is listed as a "Registered Republican". This really bothers me. She never claimed anything like that back when I knew her. But we did beyond a point find it impossible to get along. I can see how she could have moved further to the right, having those tendencies already within her. Don't know if what the site says is necessarily correct. But it has disturbed me. Makes me ask, how could I have been so stupid to be having arguments with and listening to moral degradation from such a girl.
Anti-Intellectualism has long been rampant in America. With Reagan it escalated to an epidemic. That's the first thing I would be on the look out for with Stormy Daniels, and it has nothing to do with her bra size or hair color.
I think the pro-Trump guys wouldn't want to fuck Stormy Daniels because they now view her as the enemy. And I think many anti-Trump guys wouldn't want to fuck Stormy Daniels because they are skeeved out by the thought of screwing someone who has previously had her mouth and private parts on the President. So she's not going to have many fans amongst the more politically minded PLs.
But there's also the fact that she's clearly an attention-whore, and many people are simply turned off by attention-seeking behavior. For example, Kim Kardashian is an obviously attractive woman, and yet many men seem to be turned off by her fame-seeking antics. And the same thing used to apply to Paris Hilton, back when she was still making regular appearances in the gossip columns. So I think that's what's going on in the case of Stormy Daniels, too.
How else can you explain it? There are guys here calling her old and fat, but she's actually only 38 years old and she clearly isn't fat. It's true, she's over the hill by porn standards, but still I guarantee, if you're over the age of, say, 50, Stormy Daniels is way hotter than anyone you'll ever come home to ever again in your entire life. And hotter than anyone I'll ever come home to, as well, for that matter. It helps to keep things in perspective.
47 comments
1) She would charge a foolish GPS rate and there is nothing that justifies that unless you would get off banging the pres's side bitch or wanted to brag.
2) She is without a doubt being tailed by Republican agents waiting to extort her. Do you want to be the guy getting dragged out of the hotel in your underwear in cuffs with her and have your front page picture that will turn into an immortal meme.
3) She is proven she cant be trusted. Nuff said.
4) while pretty in the day she is a has-been porn star. Plenty of better talent out there.
And of GPS rates, it seems like the going one is $1,100 per hour. That was the Heidi Fleiss rate. It was also the rate being used by retired porn star Mimi Miyagi. And you also had to pay that for a preliminary lunch date. So there seems to be some agreement on that number.
SJG
But, seems that she ran as a Republican to be LV's governor. When she did not get the nomination, she switched to Libertarian.
Well, I see that as a huge negative. The foundation of every society is that it is fair and just. You can't have that when there are huge and increasing wealth gaps, and more and more the operation of the society depends upon Social Darwinism, and when our schools are being turned into charters which the rich would never send their kids to.
So that she would go along with such is a huge negative.
We've talked about before strippers supporting Trump, during the election. People said that it was most.
Well, maybe a huge under the table income does that to people.
But I tell you, from my experience on the ground, most local strippers do not think that way at all. And most of all not in San Francisco. That is a really neat place.
I mean we all came of age in, or in the wake of, the Civil Rights Movement, the Women's Movement, and the Move to End The War in Vietnam. But then when Reagan got elected, it was like none of these hard won victories mattered. So that Daniels and Miyagi go along with this, is a huge negative.
SJG
SJG
I can only speak for myself, but I don't consider a person's political views when deciding with whom to get naked. For example, I'm a libertarian, but I've never even met a female libertarian in person before. Libertarians make up only a teeny tiny fraction of the country, and at least two-thirds of them are male.
If you believe Randommember, then you would have to believe that all the libertarians in the world have somehow congregated here on TUSCL; I strongly disagree, but that's beside the point. If you accept Random's claim that like half the people on the TUSCL board are "randoids," as he calls us, you'll notice that I *still* disagree with most of them at least half the time. My point is that if you hold out for someone who agrees with you all the time, you would be very lonely indeed.
Bear in mind that there are several big disagreements among libertarians: the yokel-tarians vs the cosmo-tarians, the Cato people vs the Ludwig von Mises people, Austrian economics vs the Chicago school of economics, "thin" libertarianism vs "thick" libertarianism, moralists vs consequentialists, the conspiracy theorists vs the skeptics, the issue of abortion, the issue of foreign policy, etc. So we don't even agree amongst ourselves. But Stormy Daniels has a great rack - I would like to think that's the one thing where we all would agree ;) And politics would be a pretty lame reason to not have sex with someone.
I don’t give a shit about her politics. If she mentions politics I’ll kick her ass out of the room - and end the session immediately!
If they bring it up, I'll humor them and talk about it but it's not my preference. Before Trump, strippers never used to talk about politics with me. But now it happens all the time. Trump has made politics more accesible to the average man and woman (perhaps because he has the diction and vocabulary of a fifth grader).
I don't think you're gonna get even an over-the-hill porn actress for less than 500. And very few can be had for less than 800. I can remember a time when 2,000 to 2,500 was the going rate. As for Stormy Daniels, I would throw her a thousand.
My SO is hotter than the way she (Stormy) looks now, and they’re the same age so of course my answer is no.
I have no desire to be wasting my time having debates with such persons, or to be giving them money. Even at our local no touching clubs I really don't engage with girls unless we are clearly able to get along.
SJG
If she wants $1000 to ride her for an hour - I’m going to wear orange self tanner - and a Trump wig - and fuck her while reciting Trump tweets....
As opposed to the average stripper, who is the epitome of trustworthiness.
LOL. I'm kinda torn because, unlike most people here, I really do think she's hot. But on the other hand, Donald Trump is pretty skeevy and I wouldn't necessarily want to be someplace where he's already been. But on the other other hand, it would be quite a story that I could always keep with me. So I guess my answer still stands. I would go for it.
"Republican - Libertarian is a severe character disorder. I have no desire to be wasting my time having debates with such persons"
Really? It begs the question of why you spend so much time debating with us here on TUSCL. For my part, I think diversity of political opinion is fine and healthy, and it's part of what makes life interesting.
I think she’s hot and kinda cute (in a milf way). I’d have no problem getting hard for an otc session with her.
It’s odd - in my view - that she fucked Trump without a condom. I thought he was a big germophobe. I guess he makes an exception for porn stars? Lol! It proves he’s a horny dude.
I wouldn't mind Jessica drake though.
I’m guessing there is a Russian pimp holding that video - and thinking of what price it will bring from Pornhub or Brazzers - or maybe Vivid?
Those Russian whores were probably super hot! It might sound very creepy - but I wonder if they bear a resemblance to Ivanka? Trump seems very enamored with her.
Most people who parrot libertarian views do so because they think it sounds good, you could even say, sounds sexy.
I listened to a book tour radio interview with this author. I felt that she was not really getting it about the cool sounding appeal of libertarianism, and how it was completely compatible with Social Darwinism. So I wrote a long message and faxed it to her. Next tour interview and she changed her pitch.
https://www.amazon.com/Cyberselfish-Crit…
So most seem to say no to Stormy Daniels. I only see BHF saying yes. So then is it really her politics, or you could say, that which goes on between her ears, which make you want to reject her?
Most of the strippers I have encountered are not like that, but there have been a few. On in particular I know was fired.
SJG
Trump’s New CIA Nominee, Gina Haspel, Faces Possible Arrest Warrant in Germany over Torture
https://www.democracynow.org/2018/3/14/t…
European Center for Constitutional and Human Rights
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/European_C…
https://www.ecchr.eu/en/home.html
some great old Ferrari's
https://blogs.yahoo.co.jp/haseo_stile/40…
https://blog-001.west.edge.storage-yahoo…
Even if she is full go, just to get the money, that still does not mean I will comply. And I notice here that most all except BHF have said no.
Daniels, no spring chicken, but still a famous porno star, so the issue would seem to be that which goes on between her ears.
Now what is it, things she has said? The alliance with Trump.
Do people know more about her?
All I know is the alliance with Trump, and that she is listed on wikipedia as "Republican". Curious about her as she is listed as from Louisiana. That is by no means a one party state. But amongst the white population there has been now decades of growing conservatism.
Were I to meet her face to face and talk with her just a bit, I would quickly be able to glean where her head was act, and that would make the decision for me.
BHF seems to think that politics is secondary. I could not disagree more strongly.
Know what, the people who always talk like politics is secondary are clergy. Its how they are able to fill churches with people who might have greatly disparate views. They replace politics with talk about "God". And that type of "God" is always always always an idol.
Saying the politics is secondary is an extremely effective kind of conservative politics. It is like trying to claim your own separate peace in a war for our nation's survival. Religion is an opiate.
Recently on a people finder site I ran across a definite listing for a GF of decades ago, and she is listed as a "Registered Republican". This really bothers me. She never claimed anything like that back when I knew her. But we did beyond a point find it impossible to get along. I can see how she could have moved further to the right, having those tendencies already within her. Don't know if what the site says is necessarily correct. But it has disturbed me. Makes me ask, how could I have been so stupid to be having arguments with and listening to moral degradation from such a girl.
Anti-Intellectualism has long been rampant in America. With Reagan it escalated to an epidemic. That's the first thing I would be on the look out for with Stormy Daniels, and it has nothing to do with her bra size or hair color.
SJG
Erik Satie
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5pyhBJzu…
This music sounds good as it was written, on piano, but not so much when adapted to organ.
Georges Delerue
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fd8XNTGW…
The Hours - Philip Glas
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wsg73PzK…
Philip Glass - Metamorphosis | complete - played live on 1920's Steinway
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M73x3O7d…
http://ilovesteinway.com/steinway/models…
But there's also the fact that she's clearly an attention-whore, and many people are simply turned off by attention-seeking behavior. For example, Kim Kardashian is an obviously attractive woman, and yet many men seem to be turned off by her fame-seeking antics. And the same thing used to apply to Paris Hilton, back when she was still making regular appearances in the gossip columns. So I think that's what's going on in the case of Stormy Daniels, too.
How else can you explain it? There are guys here calling her old and fat, but she's actually only 38 years old and she clearly isn't fat. It's true, she's over the hill by porn standards, but still I guarantee, if you're over the age of, say, 50, Stormy Daniels is way hotter than anyone you'll ever come home to ever again in your entire life. And hotter than anyone I'll ever come home to, as well, for that matter. It helps to keep things in perspective.