SW girls tell you the worst cities & states to dance in
Subraman
Car key and wallet dating your sister
Chicago
All of California, special call-outs to:
- LA: compete with thousands of beautiful girls, then mgmt takes a lot of your $
- SF: management takes a lot of your $
All of Virginia
NYC: high dancer fees... although a number of girls say the high rewards are worth the high fees
Houston: ghetto clubs, police stings
Miami: cheap extras
New Orleans: ghetto, cheap crowds
Detroit: cheap extras
Atlanta: high fees
Seattle: high fees, cheap crowds
All of AZ and NM: cheap dances
Louisville: extras, divey
Dallas: some girls complain about license fees, but others say once you pay the fee that it's a good town to dance in
Some of the descriptions by these girls, don't line up with the cities & strip clubs I know. For example, the characterization of SF clubs all being extras clubs ... that girl probably wasn't hot enough to get into the many non-extras clubs
Got something to say?
Start your own discussion
37 comments
Latest
It seems often times the clubs PLs like are not liked by the dancers - on several occasions I've talked w/ dancers about certain clubs I visit that get a fairly good crowd and often they'll tell me they don't like that club and often has to do w/ the girls working there not being friendly or being cutthroat bitches
It's interesting where there's overlap -- cities like SF and Seattle get mentioned by both PLs and strippers as bad SC cities. In SF, there's a clear and proximate cause: SF went from arguably the best SC city in the late 90s, to one of the worst today, because of a nearly-complete takeover of all SCs by Deja Vu. Deja Vu has made the customer experience terrible, and due to their monopoly power, can extract huge $ from the girls for what is now a tepid business
NYC, as the girls describe it, is an interesting one, with some girls loving it and others hating it. The difference seems to be: girls who are hot enough and who know how to work the insiders' system (paying bouncers to direct guys your way, etc) seem to be making serious bank despite the large fees; girls who are not hot enough and can't penetrate the system, end up suffering the fees but not pulling in enough revenue to make up for it.
My fave way of SCing here is more of a regulars' game, so will be hard to do on just a business trip. If I had a buddy coming in, I'd tell him to just go to Gold Club, Hustlers, or Condor, count on low contact, and just plan on spending a fun few hours drinking with a hot girl. If that doesn't appeal to you, skip the SCs
"Detroit: cheap extras" This is what makes Detroit a good strip club city.
Pasties (not in ALL of Virginia, but in Richmond which is where I'm at), no liquor AND over-priced dances. :-(
What an awful combination. This is why I very rarely go to clubs in my area. I just wait until I'm out of town, which isn't often enough
Fortunately, if that means that "strippers" such as those hanging out on SW won't come here, I'm ok with that.
It's like when I go to Burger King and see Whopper Jr.'s are only a $1, I will order 80 of them because, "I don't want to lose money!"
In that case, I'd better stay out of Vegas, lol.
High house fees are a turn off but if they limit how many girls are working then they can make a lot at those clubs.
Clubs with cheap dances can be profitable if you go by volume. Especially if they attract blue collar guys who get paid daily.
Lol, do it. If feeling extra ballsy, then cross post a post from there into r/stripclubs and see who you can get angry at you.
I personally have a hard time believing any city with multiple clubs and is large enough for them all would be “the worst”. It could maybe be “not worth it compared to manager bullshit at most places and the cost of living where I’m at”—which would be fair enough. But the worst has to be somewhere it’s not easy to hop on over elsewhere. But on the flip side, that kind of club has the potential to be one of the best places too.