Which is better?

Big head says option 1 and little head says option 2. I would go with option 2 if I had you bank roll.

The majority of my life was situation #1. This year I've started enjoying situation #2. It's too soon for me to know the answer to this question, but I've enjoyed both scenarios. Currently, I'm enjoying the heck out of situation #2 though. Curious to see what others have to say.

*your bank roll.

Option 1 is harder to find. 2 will always be there.

Number 1. No contest. You'll spend a lot less, have more than just a sexual relationship and a great sexual relationship. Win, win, win.

If I was rich option 2. Otherwise option 1. But a a. stripfifgter suggests, finding a hot girl that's eager to please is like finding a needle in a haystack.

*as stripfighter suggests. Autocorrect is changing to words that aren't even words.

Option 1, not even close. You have a whole lot of time that you actually are not having sex. With option 2, you are by yourself. That will start to suck more and more as you age into your next decade. Also, clearly your dancers with option 2 are pros. You cut them off and they got themselves back on the payroll. Eventually, all that money going in that direction will be an issue, even if it is not right now.

i was in option 1.1 for half my life. sub option 1.2 could be nice. option 2 is soooo good.

I'd go for number 1. #2 has its perks and is never just the same ole, same ole, but 30 years from now or whenever my health starts to significantly decline, I'd like to have that "one" there.

Number 1 for sure, no contest. If in number 2, the girls were free fuck buddies, I would choose number 2.

Option 1 is certainly preferable but far less practical as the years go by. What start out as a hot and steamy relationship with a real beauty turns into annual sex (if that much) with someone moving far past their prime. Then #2 starts looking real good.

1....mainly because of what RTP said....the companionship factor

I would like to say #1. But, as I age, I increasingly see the benefit of living the #2 lifestyle. As the old joke goes. I don't pay for sex. I pay for them to leave. I have dated civilian women in the past. #2 in my opinion is less complicated. I have chosen #2 without really considering it too much. If for no other reason, I was tired of all of the games civilian women play.

If I'm to choose one of them, then option 1.

Option 1. Option 2 sounds like your running some sex shop industry and the women are nothing more than common goods to you. That's creepy and sick sounding

Lololol Tibuorn that's so funny and true

I would take No. 1 in a heartbeat. Although I've found that difficult to find.

option 1 is NOT CHEAP. believe me. she costs me a lot. butt i do miss her cooking.

Well... if she's a good mother to your children, and is a productive member of society, and she doesn't hose you for half or more in a divorce, the obviously #1. Such women do exist, but they are rare specimens and are the first ones "off the market" IME.

Option 1. You can always go back to option 1 if it goes sideways.

My big head says option #2 as well as my little-head

I see option #1 as an awesome new car that is great when new but w/ time will show it's age & won't be as nice as the newer models even if you try to maintain the upkeep - and after a while you are used to having/driving it & doesn't get you as excited anymore

One is my choice, I don't need some crazy stripper sucking cash.

For either option, the grass will always be greener...

Papi's analogy for the win.

I tried to ask this before in an earlier and very open ended thread, Would You Do It Again, and JS69 said yes, he would do Marriage and Family Again. I felt that people were not really thinking about it.

Anyway, I will never be married to a woman or live with a woman again. But this does not mean that I will not have long term connections to them. It will just work differently.

My view is that monogamy is bad for women and men.

Remember coldnshallow? She would never go along with this, even though her own life experiences tended to support it. Not wrong form women to try and demand monogamy. But I feel that it is horrid. It is not just that the one partner ages or has limitations. I feel that the institution it self is toxic.

So when JS69 was talking about dumping DS1 in favor of his Civvi MILF, I advised caution in going that way. Need to really think it through.

My ex-wife had her limitations, but the societal pressures are what really poisoned it. I feel that we need to find other ways.

SJG

Nema en.wikipedia.org

Conan! What is best in life?

When I've had #1, the thought of #2 never even crossed my mind.

It's tougher though in situations where your partner is average for her age and is half hearted about sexually satisfying you.

If you're that happy, dump the whores.

at this point in my life option 2! For god's sake john go back to the DS's...LOL!

b/f I turned 40; very likely I would have chosen #1; now past 40, #2 (maybe at some point in the future I may revert back to #1 but that is TBD)

Yoda says it is better to shit at McD's

I think #1 would be more fulfilling

but

#2 would be more exciting, like a rollercoaster.

I would probably have to go with #1, I would be curious if I could actually do it and remain "faithful." My guess is no.

IF you choose #2 why not just buy a silicone doll. I hear they make them in America much better than they do in Japan AND you can customize them at your leisure. In theory you have a complaicant different stepford wife every night. America even makes celebrity editions. Lifelike and all, all for the low low price of a cool $3K.

Sorry that was a little too far. Just had a very...illuminating day filled with over the top conversations with some people I know.

Give me #1. With a sexual freak, who is always trying to please me, I wouldn't need another woman.

i love sampling soooooo many HOT 18+ women! freedom!

Number 1 as memories will fill in when the experience drops off. Moreover the option 2 can always be on the table with option 1 but option 1 will not , usually, co-exists with option 2. Good decision to have to make. Some guys do not have an option 1 and cannot afford the option 2.

Interesting. A group of strip club enthusiasts chooses a monogamous relationship over a life with strippers. Sometimes you guys surprise me.

Don't know why that would surprise you, JS. Having a woman who is a sexual freak who just plain likes you is infinitely preferable to knowing she's with you just because you're paying her.

ATACdawg more or less took the words right out of my mouth

Not sure why you are surprised, JS69.

Most guys want a beautiful woman who will love them and satisfy them sexually. Some don't want the hassle, and many have come to realize how rare that type of woman is.

Paying for it will never stroke the ego like civvy sex.

Obviously number 1. Then pet your unicorn and shine your pot o gold.

The point is -- I am not convinced she exists. If you reach middle age or beyond and have a wife that " is very attractive for her age, is a sexual freak who will try hard to meet your every sexual need and desire, and is fun, pleasant, and not a bitch" then hit your knees every night and every morning. Oh yeah, and pet that unicorn for me.

If you'll add "bisexual" to your #1 description then I can tell you with 100% certainty that option 1 is the way to go.

Since I don't think I can find a 74 yo woman that can fill the requirements of #1, I'll go with #2. :)

A mistress and a wife, that's the life