Small naturals or Big fakes
IronFox22
Ohio
Hypothetical: You have a chance to spend a fun evening getting dances (and likely more) from one of two girls.. They have equally attractive asses, personalities, intelligence, hair, facial features, possibilities for extras, etc. The only difference is that one girl has big fake boobs while the other one has much smaller natural boobs. The small, natural tit girl wins every time, right?. I'm provided two representative samples of tits below (ignore the girls' faces). Which would you choose?
http://www.fuckyeahfaketits.com/post/109…
http://albums.xbabe.com/main/682x682/200…
http://www.fuckyeahfaketits.com/post/109…
http://albums.xbabe.com/main/682x682/200…
48 comments
the girl with the small breasts in the pictures you provided....her breasts aren't too small
So that made it very easy to choose
Big fake!
Big fake!
SW dancers I hope you're paying attention
i totally agree motor.
just a few weeks ago i did a 15 minute VIP with a 20-year-old brunette who had very nice perky natural B cups and towards the end of our dance she asked me if she should get them enhanced. let's just say i said no as kindly as i could lol
i think many strippers think that most customers prefer bigger breasts (bigger is better mindset)--and thus that's why they make the plunge and get implants
Because regular TUSCL posters aren't even close to a majority, or even a significant minority, of strip club goers. Most guys in strip clubs believe the "there's no sex in the champagne room" bullshit.
Girls get big tits because guys *do* like them. At least until they get their hands on them. For just appearance, lots of guys are still in the "bigger is better" camp.
Most strippers I've talked to CLAIM that their revenues go noticeably up when they get implants. On every strip club forum I've ever seen, "small naturals" crushes "big fakies" every time, but the girls say that either we're posing, or that forum guys aren't representative of customer tastes at-large.
bvino, I don't actually believe that's what going on here. Speaking for myself, even if it's "look only, no touch", I'll take small naturals every time. I'd bet most of the guys saying "small naturals" would agree -- I like everything about naturals better, how they look, how they feel, and how they represent a woman who isn't so insecure about her body that she gets plastic surgery.
What about you other guys? Any of you who voted "small naturals" change your vote in a look-but-don't-touch club?
@Subraman I seldom go to look but don't touch clubs.
I do not deny that a great pair is great but most fake tits look fake because most strippers can't afford a good plastic surgeon or decide to go much bigger than they should and they look BAD.
http://www.hosted.mplstudios.com/galleri…
@chessmaster: I too have seen many, many fakes that *look* good when the woman is dressed. Check out Sara X Mills on Facebook and Instagram for an example.
Far fewer look good when they are naked, or nearly so, though. Since Miss Sara declines to display her assets in their full glory, it's hard to tell, but I based on what she *has* displayed she falls just ever so slightly short of "looks great" when naked.
Even fewer feel right when I get my hands on them. Two local strippers (one an escort) have beautiful bodies, and simply gorgeous breasts, even when naked. But both of them fall short on during the tactile test.
I have met precisely one stripper whose fake breasts were so good that I couldn't tell, even with the massage she let me do. I didn't believe her until she showed me the scar, which was barely discernible in her navel.
The reason the dancers make more money is more 1st timers will take a chance on a girl with big tits; they figure if she's a dud in the grindage at least she has big tits. But they lose out on some men who might have become regulars because they'll dance with the big tit girl but want to spend their time and money with the natural girl, so it evens out. My ATF once considered enhancement but she's already as busy as she chooses to be, so she's stayed natural.
And as gmd mentioned; although I do not like fake-ones; some of them look awesome when mostly covered up and maybe just showing some cleavage – but once they are bare many do not look as attractive nor do they feel as good – an OTOH some natural boobs may look unimpressive but look much better once seen bare and can feel much more amazing than they might o/w look covered-up.
The girl I hung out with this weekend has small, okay-shaped boobs, but a 9.8 world-class ass. I could not give a shit less that her boobs aren't that great. Nor would I give a shit if she had big clown boobs. Meanwhile, I have buddies who will point a chick out to me because he thinks she's hot, and I'll be like, "Dude, she's got a glass eye and a pegleg, and weighs like 50 pounds too much." Him: "But she's got big tits, man, you see those tits?". Me: "Don't ever point a chick out to me ever again. And I'm going to slap your momma for not breastfeeding you enough, or whatever caused this fucking malfunction."
I'm with the others who aren't all that focused on tits. I love them like I love other parts of a woman's body. I like playing with them, but they're a sideshow, not the main event.
I like'em both! Haha...
So in this case I'll take the small naturals, but it's a case by case basis.