Shes a 7. If you look close shes also an older girl. bangme.net must be like the old am-I-hot-or-not.com where you post pics and the other members rate you, kinda like this thread.
I don't think having the same taste in women is an indication of what reviews you can trust. A good review gives people with a wide variety of tastes a good idea of whether they would like a club.
Decent body it looks like in some pictures. In others, not so good.
Hate to say it, but face wouldn't do it for me.
I'd have to be really, really toasted drunk to even consider it.
Like others, I'd pass. Especially if I was sober. lol.
Hard to say from the pics posted. Too many pics and most are pretty different. Some pics had no tits and others looks like a boob job which def improved the pics IMO. The pics pre-boob job she's too skinny for us. We'd pass. The face just doesn't do it for me from the pics posted and the hair and bangs made me instantly say no. The only pic that sorta looked decent was the one from 2004 where she had decent hair and no bangs. I don't like it when women frame their face with bangs. Overall from what's available to see I'd had to give her an overall 5 and I don't think me or mrs sea would approach her for any dances.
Overall, from I see in the pics, I'd have to say about 6, maybe 6.5. No offense, Rachel, but the pictures really aren't among the best, particularly the selfies. There's too much range in the dates (if that 2004 time stamp is accurate) to get a decent gauge on things. Some variety in the facial expressions would help a lot for me, too. I have a feeling she's someone I'd have to meet and spend some time with to get a decent idea of how to rate her.
It's hard to tell from one pic from above. last night maybe a 6.5, this morning she looks better. She might look even better if I saw a pic facing her front side instead of the angle in the one pic I saw.
Seriously, I never evaluate girls by their pictures. I have to meet her face to face.
So for example, if I was shown pictures of a dancer and I was going to her club, I would not tell her I was coming. I might not like her face to face. I might like one of the others.
When dealing with escorts, pictures are the best you can do. But with SC's and AMP's, you can see the girl face to face before their is any commitment and to minimize hurt feelings. SC's are best because you should be able to get quite friendly with them, for some money, before committing to more than that.
So my trusted reviewers are anyone who handed a 5 or less. Think we have that same standard of beauty, and scale appropriately. Thanks for those who chimed in.
For me any woman I'd fuck without needing to be drunk usually gets a 6. I'm pretty generous with my 6s. And I know I could fuck a 6 for free without too much hassle.
I'm picky with my 9s and 10s. I haven't seen a 10 at the club yet. Most SI models are 9s at best. There's one 9.5 at my club, and she's a low mileage 19 year old. My favorites are usually 7.5 or 8s that give good milage.
OK, so after viewing the pics on my PC rather than my phone, I'd have to say she's a bit more attractive than I'd originally thought. Possibly getting into pay territory now.
If instead we just used terms to describe the rating 1 to 3, repulsive, shouldn't be dancing at all. 4, below average. 5 to 7, average, 8 good looking. 9 very hot. 10 perfection. I would have given her an average rating.
Comments
last commentyes I'm trying to get a feel for people's scales on here so I know who's reviews I can trust.
Log in to vote
post the link....
Log in to vote
Hope it works:
bangme.net
Log in to vote
Yup it does
Log in to vote
Face: 6
Body: 7?
I would, but wouldn't pay for it
Log in to vote
I'd pass.
Log in to vote
Shes a 7. If you look close shes also an older girl. bangme.net must be like the old am-I-hot-or-not.com where you post pics and the other members rate you, kinda like this thread.
Log in to vote
Not a good pic but yeah maybe a 7.
I don't think having the same taste in women is an indication of what reviews you can trust. A good review gives people with a wide variety of tastes a good idea of whether they would like a club.
Log in to vote
one of the pics is dated 2004. her weight changes and so does her chest from pic to pic.
Log in to vote
I might take the fight, but I wouldn't cut weight
Log in to vote
face=5.5-6
body=5
Log in to vote
Moooo
Log in to vote
Decent body it looks like in some pictures. In others, not so good.
Hate to say it, but face wouldn't do it for me.
I'd have to be really, really toasted drunk to even consider it.
Like others, I'd pass. Especially if I was sober. lol.
Log in to vote
Hard to say from the pics posted. Too many pics and most are pretty different. Some pics had no tits and others looks like a boob job which def improved the pics IMO. The pics pre-boob job she's too skinny for us. We'd pass. The face just doesn't do it for me from the pics posted and the hair and bangs made me instantly say no. The only pic that sorta looked decent was the one from 2004 where she had decent hair and no bangs. I don't like it when women frame their face with bangs. Overall from what's available to see I'd had to give her an overall 5 and I don't think me or mrs sea would approach her for any dances.
Log in to vote
i meant too many pics that have too many differences. Head shot selfies are hard to judge.
Log in to vote
Overall, from I see in the pics, I'd have to say about 6, maybe 6.5. No offense, Rachel, but the pictures really aren't among the best, particularly the selfies. There's too much range in the dates (if that 2004 time stamp is accurate) to get a decent gauge on things. Some variety in the facial expressions would help a lot for me, too. I have a feeling she's someone I'd have to meet and spend some time with to get a decent idea of how to rate her.
Log in to vote
I don't feel comfortable rating somebody until I meet them! Personality is important! :)
But it think you're being a bit harsh! Is she flawless? No, and she says so! That's kind of brilliant!
Log in to vote
It's hard to tell from one pic from above. last night maybe a 6.5, this morning she looks better. She might look even better if I saw a pic facing her front side instead of the angle in the one pic I saw.
Log in to vote
Seriously, I never evaluate girls by their pictures. I have to meet her face to face.
So for example, if I was shown pictures of a dancer and I was going to her club, I would not tell her I was coming. I might not like her face to face. I might like one of the others.
When dealing with escorts, pictures are the best you can do. But with SC's and AMP's, you can see the girl face to face before their is any commitment and to minimize hurt feelings. SC's are best because you should be able to get quite friendly with them, for some money, before committing to more than that.
SJG
Cramps, Smell of the Female
youtube.com
Log in to vote
I agree with others 7
Log in to vote
5.5
Log in to vote
My rating would be a 5. She us decent looking for an older chick. Bit would be lucky to get two dollars from me, and that would be just to go away.
Log in to vote
JS69, you're pretty generous with the scoring for someone who's banging the best looking girl in the world.
Log in to vote
JamesSD. Come'on bro...you're in SD, that bitch should have gotten minus points from you :p
Log in to vote
So my trusted reviewers are anyone who handed a 5 or less. Think we have that same standard of beauty, and scale appropriately. Thanks for those who chimed in.
Log in to vote
So, GACA, does this mean that the rest of us shouldn't trust your reviews? ; )
Log in to vote
I've always said I'm a tough grader. Kind of like that Texas A & M professor that hsve an "F" to the entire class.
Log in to vote
@Phantom or they could take my reviews rating and if I said 5-6, they know they'd be enjoying 7-8
Log in to vote
Based on those pics, she falls into the "attractive, but not hot" category for me. Still doable, though not for pay.
Log in to vote
Eh, maybe I was feeling generous.
For me any woman I'd fuck without needing to be drunk usually gets a 6. I'm pretty generous with my 6s. And I know I could fuck a 6 for free without too much hassle.
I'm picky with my 9s and 10s. I haven't seen a 10 at the club yet. Most SI models are 9s at best. There's one 9.5 at my club, and she's a low mileage 19 year old. My favorites are usually 7.5 or 8s that give good milage.
Log in to vote
To be nice, I'll just say she's not my type.
Log in to vote
OK, so after viewing the pics on my PC rather than my phone, I'd have to say she's a bit more attractive than I'd originally thought. Possibly getting into pay territory now.
Log in to vote
If instead we just used terms to describe the rating 1 to 3, repulsive, shouldn't be dancing at all. 4, below average. 5 to 7, average, 8 good looking. 9 very hot. 10 perfection. I would have given her an average rating.
Log in to vote
I'll bang anyone if I like them. She's hot in an MILF way if not top stripper quality. I think as a value escort...yes.
Log in to vote
@GACAclub “or they could take my reviews rating and if I said 5-6, they know they'd be enjoying 7-8”
or 2-3
Log in to vote