tuscl

Calibration : Rachel Elleman

GACA
Un-retired: Met my ATF. Married her. Divorcing her.
OK for the guys that have seen her pic, how would you rate from 1-10

35 comments

  • GACA
    9 years ago
    yes I'm trying to get a feel for people's scales on here so I know who's reviews I can trust.
  • shailynn
    9 years ago
    post the link....
  • GACA
    9 years ago
    Yup it does
  • JamesSD
    9 years ago
    Face: 6
    Body: 7?

    I would, but wouldn't pay for it
  • lopaw
    9 years ago
    I'd pass.
  • tobala
    9 years ago
    Shes a 7. If you look close shes also an older girl. bangme.net must be like the old am-I-hot-or-not.com where you post pics and the other members rate you, kinda like this thread.
  • JohnSmith69
    9 years ago
    Not a good pic but yeah maybe a 7.

    I don't think having the same taste in women is an indication of what reviews you can trust. A good review gives people with a wide variety of tastes a good idea of whether they would like a club.
  • tobala
    9 years ago
    one of the pics is dated 2004. her weight changes and so does her chest from pic to pic.
  • Subraman
    9 years ago
    I might take the fight, but I wouldn't cut weight
  • rattdog
    9 years ago
    face=5.5-6
    body=5

  • jackslash
    9 years ago
    Moooo
  • warhawks
    9 years ago

    Decent body it looks like in some pictures. In others, not so good.

    Hate to say it, but face wouldn't do it for me.
    I'd have to be really, really toasted drunk to even consider it.
    Like others, I'd pass. Especially if I was sober. lol.
  • seaboardrr
    9 years ago
    Hard to say from the pics posted. Too many pics and most are pretty different. Some pics had no tits and others looks like a boob job which def improved the pics IMO. The pics pre-boob job she's too skinny for us. We'd pass. The face just doesn't do it for me from the pics posted and the hair and bangs made me instantly say no. The only pic that sorta looked decent was the one from 2004 where she had decent hair and no bangs. I don't like it when women frame their face with bangs. Overall from what's available to see I'd had to give her an overall 5 and I don't think me or mrs sea would approach her for any dances.
  • seaboardrr
    9 years ago
    i meant too many pics that have too many differences. Head shot selfies are hard to judge.
  • PhantomGeek
    9 years ago
    Overall, from I see in the pics, I'd have to say about 6, maybe 6.5. No offense, Rachel, but the pictures really aren't among the best, particularly the selfies. There's too much range in the dates (if that 2004 time stamp is accurate) to get a decent gauge on things. Some variety in the facial expressions would help a lot for me, too. I have a feeling she's someone I'd have to meet and spend some time with to get a decent idea of how to rate her.
  • 4got2wipe
    9 years ago
    I don't feel comfortable rating somebody until I meet them! Personality is important! :)

    But it think you're being a bit harsh! Is she flawless? No, and she says so! That's kind of brilliant!
  • sharkhunter
    9 years ago
    It's hard to tell from one pic from above. last night maybe a 6.5, this morning she looks better. She might look even better if I saw a pic facing her front side instead of the angle in the one pic I saw.
  • san_jose_guy
    9 years ago
    Seriously, I never evaluate girls by their pictures. I have to meet her face to face.

    So for example, if I was shown pictures of a dancer and I was going to her club, I would not tell her I was coming. I might not like her face to face. I might like one of the others.

    When dealing with escorts, pictures are the best you can do. But with SC's and AMP's, you can see the girl face to face before their is any commitment and to minimize hurt feelings. SC's are best because you should be able to get quite friendly with them, for some money, before committing to more than that.

    SJG

    Cramps, Smell of the Female
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V00BEZV3…
  • rl27
    9 years ago
    I agree with others 7
  • ime
    9 years ago
    5.5
  • GACA
    9 years ago
    My rating would be a 5. She us decent looking for an older chick. Bit would be lucky to get two dollars from me, and that would be just to go away.
  • GACA
    9 years ago
    JS69, you're pretty generous with the scoring for someone who's banging the best looking girl in the world.
  • GACA
    9 years ago
    JamesSD. Come'on bro...you're in SD, that bitch should have gotten minus points from you :p
  • GACA
    9 years ago
    So my trusted reviewers are anyone who handed a 5 or less. Think we have that same standard of beauty, and scale appropriately. Thanks for those who chimed in.
  • PhantomGeek
    9 years ago
    So, GACA, does this mean that the rest of us shouldn't trust your reviews? ; )
  • motorhead
    9 years ago
    4. Sorry I'm late

    I've always said I'm a tough grader. Kind of like that Texas A & M professor that hsve an "F" to the entire class.
  • GACA
    9 years ago
    @Phantom or they could take my reviews rating and if I said 5-6, they know they'd be enjoying 7-8
  • georgmicrodong
    9 years ago
    Based on those pics, she falls into the "attractive, but not hot" category for me. Still doable, though not for pay.
  • JamesSD
    9 years ago
    Eh, maybe I was feeling generous.

    For me any woman I'd fuck without needing to be drunk usually gets a 6. I'm pretty generous with my 6s. And I know I could fuck a 6 for free without too much hassle.

    I'm picky with my 9s and 10s. I haven't seen a 10 at the club yet. Most SI models are 9s at best. There's one 9.5 at my club, and she's a low mileage 19 year old. My favorites are usually 7.5 or 8s that give good milage.
  • Clackport
    9 years ago
    To be nice, I'll just say she's not my type.
  • georgmicrodong
    9 years ago
    OK, so after viewing the pics on my PC rather than my phone, I'd have to say she's a bit more attractive than I'd originally thought. Possibly getting into pay territory now.
  • sharkhunter
    9 years ago
    If instead we just used terms to describe the rating 1 to 3, repulsive, shouldn't be dancing at all. 4, below average. 5 to 7, average, 8 good looking. 9 very hot. 10 perfection. I would have given her an average rating.
  • rockstar666
    9 years ago
    I'll bang anyone if I like them. She's hot in an MILF way if not top stripper quality. I think as a value escort...yes.
  • DoctorPhil
    9 years ago
    @GACAclub “or they could take my reviews rating and if I said 5-6, they know they'd be enjoying 7-8”


    or 2-3
You must be a member to leave a comment.Join Now
Got something to say?
Start your own discussion