Providing dancers' names in reviews
Thekingof32
Lately I haven't been posting dancer's named in any of my reviews. If I'm referring to a particular dancer I'll use descriptions like body type, hair color, tattoos etc. The only time I think names are appropriate in reviews is when referring to ROB's. Does every person reading my need to know that my favorite provides BBFS in the VIP??? I think those kinds of details should be reserved for PM. However, I've been noticing an increase in the amount of users posting names in their reviews.
What do you think the standard should be? Are named appropriate in reviews and under what circumstances?
What do you think the standard should be? Are named appropriate in reviews and under what circumstances?
13 comments
Now, if I ever run into a ROB, I will spread her name far and wide!
I also enjoy other's reviews who mention my favorites. Some echo my experiences with them which is positive of course, and some make them seem like a different person, both in personality and relative contact. It just goes to show that the dancer's opinion of a PL is a fundamental part of the experience. One of my faves is always available to make me cum one way or another, but she's not necessarily like that for others.
For me, the key point is that what happens in private between me and a stripper is confidential. I'm even pretty guarded about revealing anything to other dancers or patrons in person or in PMs. On the internet, I may tell about my experience in generalities, but there's no way I'm going to name or even imply who it was with.
I read a review recently in which extras were mentioned from a dancer named something like "Na**sha". Way to conceal her identity, dude!