Why BBBJ but CFS
216OJ614
In a lot of reviews with "extras" the guys will have a BBBJ but CFS. Why? Is it because we fear STDs from vaginal penetration more than from oral? Or does a BBBJ really feel that much better than a CBJ? Maybe it's so they don't get the dancer pregnant?
16 comments
I think it's something that guys will tell you they don't want, or don't do because of the risk of STDs. Same thing guys said years ago when extras weren't as standard as they are now - something they didn't want or due to STD risks. Kind of patting themselves on the back/making a virtue out of necessity. I think the real reason is just that's it's not offered that often. If it were I bet they would engage despite whatever rationalizations for not they currently offer at the moment.
Girls might say they have an STD fear and some do, but I've yet to meet a girl (not just dancers)that wouldn't fuck me bareback at some point when there was access to a shower.
1. More chance of STD from FS
2. Risk of pregnancy from FS
3. Reserving the intimacy of FS for boyfriend /husband
"Have a baby by me baby, be on welfare"
Oral's not really sex according to Billy Clinton.
Why the F@#$ would you risk knocking her up? Child support is expensive. (So are antiviral drugs)
I'd also agree with the "clean up" issue.
For those of you poor sods who haven't experienced the freedom of getting snipped, pregnancy obviously is an issue.
@ Esta: I can say from experience (27 years) that it does not :-)