BlankSpace has been deleted.

Wow! Pretty fucking responsive. When I got home and checked I found that got a email from BlankSpace. It was truly amazing reading! That guy could weave a yarn!!!

^^^ I got two PMs from him. You guessed it - empty subject; empty body.

BlankSpace was clearly Juice/TDHQ. Glad he's no longer with us...

I wonder if there is a technical way for Founder to determine someone using multiple aliases from the same device? If so, that would help keeping those that are banned for stupidity; banned.

It's a new day.

Thank god backspace is gone...that's y I stoped posting...that shit got old fast

Papi the answer is yes

Damn phone...i ment blankspace...my phone corrected it as backspace LOL

Double Bravo !! Does he/she/it hold the shortest record for TUSCL membership?

Papi: "I wonder if there is a technical way for Founder to determine someone using multiple aliases from the same device? "

I don't think there is a way to prevent it (currently) if the person is knowledgable/determined enough. For example you could give them a cookie, but they could just delete it later.

What about milk ?

We all know blank space was Juice. That dude needs help.

Sorry not this time....dude once juicebox69 froze up I learned my leason...y you thank bigtuna is calm in comparision to juice....shit man.....

HAHAHA...The next one gone needs to be juice's aliases and zipperturd

Tuna,is that a P-51 Mustang?

Sorry!Spitfire.

every now and then I do something good

Like!

@founder....Lol...good one bro

Blankspace was a waste of....space

I guess crazyjoe’s post above was a silent protest in support of blankspace

I don't think there is a way to prevent it (currently) if the person is knowledgable/determined enough. For example you could give them a cookie, but they could just delete it later.

One can ban by REMOTE_IP - yea, they can get a new one, but it is getting harder and harder to do so these days.

"every now and then I do something good"

If by "every now and then" you mean "every day just by keeping this site up", I agree completely. :)

I'm telling you the easiest way to do it would be to ban IP addresses. That's the easiest way to do things right now (didn't say it was great but it sure is the easiest thus far)

Personally though, never found him a problem. Forgot he existed sometimes with how little he posted. Maybe I'm just used to ignoring crap.

@tumblingdice. It isn't a Spitfire (the finest fighter ever built)

I wonder if it was Taylor Swift all along.

@londonguy: the Spitfire the finest fighter ever built? First of all, you have to put it in the context of its era. For example, you couldn't even think about matching up a Spitfire against an F-22 Raptor.

Second, how was it used? The Spit, while quick and very maneuverable (excuse the American spelling) was notoriously short-legged and was not suitable for deep escort of bombers. Definitely superior to the ME 109, but a lot iffier vs the FW 190. Contrast this with the P 51D, a very good airplane that was darn near as maneuverable as the Spit, was considerably faster and had roughly three times the useful range using the same engine! The ME 262 was 100 mph faster and in the hands of a great pilot was virtually unstoppable. Fortunately for us it had very short range and a mean time between hours of only 25 hours because of its first generation engines.

Not criticizing (US spelling again) the Spit which was a fine airplane and a staunch defender during the Battle of Britain, but as an all purpose fighter, it was only second rate.