Comments by rickmacrodong (page 2)

SMT Trump apparently disavowed project 2025. If what you said is true thats ridiculous. the other major issues with the republican party right now are how they want to torture and ban immigrants and wipe out the middle east.

Something that hasnt been mentioned in this thread is the fact these ID scanners are also used to verify the ID is real.. something that not every bouncer is capable of. The primary purpose of them is their verification purpose and demographics data like finding out the ages of customers, how customers spend money .. etc. maybe 1% or less of club customers are banned I doubt thats the main purpose. Most clubs only have a few managers and bouncers and can probably recognize banned guys

Nixur i dont think the ID scanning does a background check does it? They can use the info from the ID to then run a background check, but i doubt they will have the time or willingness to do that with every customer The biggest problem with these ID scanning clubs is that they have the poorest, most desperate people in the club (the bouncers) scanning the IDs and given access to the software. They should really only give access to the owner or one of the highly paid managers. And if a dancer is aware of the ID scanning software which they probably will be, now anytime theres an issue with a customer, the dancer can basically obtain the customers full address and identity, and either rob the guys place or threaten to contact his family friends workplace etc. it isnt hard for a dancer to pull a bouncers strings, they can offer some sexual favors or some money and the bouncer will give them access. I would assume a club could be sued over the ID scan software if it was proven that a bouncer or dancer accessed the info for nefarious purposes. Say a guys house gets robbed or he gets into some professional trouble or family issues because a dancer used the club system to access his info.. the club is probably liable for something at that point…

^pocket watching isnt entirely wrong but if its not being used to harm other people or oneself, it doesnt really matter what they’re spending their money on. Note that means if theyre giving their money to a pimp, that is basically self harm, so its good to not pay girls who have pimps/baby daddies they support. That way the leeches can starve

It can be used for banning customers, and the numerous demographics data, but it can also probably be accessed by other employees besides the club owner. Many people might not want some ghetto dancer or bouncer having access to their home address or complete real name. Especially if they know you’re a big spender, some ghetto dancer or her pimp could easily be tempted to rob your place… like Icey, some people dont even find anything wrong with robbing tricks as they put it.

Atacdawg, icey is racist. He calls girls like this average or ugly, but if its an ugly latina or black girl hell say shes super hot. He goes out of his way to specifically under rate the white girls and over rate the minority ones.

There are OF girls who will chat with you one on one once your subbed to them. And some do meetups with fans but it cant be discussed on the messaging on there

There is tons of free porn available… but at the same time, if you want to see a specific only fans girl, you may need to subscribe unless she also posts free videos on other sites or someone leaks her OF stuff. I normally would never pay for OF… On one occasion i signed up for an escorts OF.. just $10.. to see what she had on it. I would have possibly spent $500 on her for an hour, so to me it was worth the OF fee. You also get to chat with them one on one. Im glad i did it because on her OF, i was able to find her IG, and also found her boyfriend pimp through the OF and IG. She gained $10 from the OF, but lost $500 I would have spent on her. There are a few amateur pornstars online who reveal their face on onlyfans for paying subscribers. I signed up for a few of those faceless pornstars OF’s, purely to see what their faces looked like. So it was just a one-time, one month sign up to see what they looked like. It was worth the $5-$10 for me to do it. Unfortunately some of them were scammers and wanted you to pay an additional one time fee to purchase a video showing their face. It was misleading that they didnt state that upfront… only after you paid and subbed to their onlyfans.

Drew ill address some of your points. They arent accurate. I agree that there are a category of people usually on the right, who think immigrants have to give up their religion or their own culture, and get into beer and football and thanksgiving, in order to be american. It’s mistaken, because if giving up religion and culture wss necessary it would be in the constitution “So why are some so concerned about the legality of another man’s immigration status? One possibility is that the obsession with the illegality of border crossers is little more than a weak veil for xenophobia. It’s easier to say “but but but they’re BREAKING THE LAW”, than to admit “I don’t like Mexicans”. Imagine being faced with starvation or living under threat, and deciding to commit the enormous crime of breaking an immigration law. PERISH the thought.” In some cases its racism, some cases its blue collar workers who want protectionist economic policies. Mexicans are willing to work for cheaper, and that can hurt the business of some citizen who wants to charge more. It’s similar to how some local american born dancers want $1000 for the same extras a Cuban is willing to do for $200 or $300. You are right, if someone is under threat or starvation, it shouldnt be a crime for them to come here. So the question is what do they do when they come here? Are you proposing they should be given free housing or food? That is where you would be wrong, it isnt the responsibility of americans to provide anyone shelter or food. Do you go to other countries and just show up and expect them to give you free stuff? If you want to move to another country is it acceptable to just show up and demand they give you stuff? Thats laughable

Some of the answers were for fast casual restaurants. Shake shack and five guys, can take 10 minutes to prepare your burger. If were counting fast casual, ill say smashburger. In my opinion, it is a lot better than five guys or shake shack. If its strictly fast food places, has to be the arbys wagyu cheeseburger. Or their big game burger possibly

^thats probably any sense really. Taste, touch, smell, hearing, seeing.. it’s laughable to go on these long diatribes about how smell is intricately linked to memory. Its pseudo intellectual nonsense… youre trying to sound educated and sophisticated discussing an extremely simple concept… of course smells can trigger memories.. people generally learn that at 4 years old or something..

Icey everything you criticize, you also support when its in favor of your chosen group. You may have some valid criticisms of right wingers- but the first mistake you make is judging most right wingers based off your personal experience. You support minority race’s being allowed to pummel, rape, rob and attack white people. So thats no different than a right wing extremist who believes whites can do the same. Its two sides of the same coin. You believe clients shouldn’t rob dancers, but its fine for dancers to rob clients. So your worldview is fundamentally flawed, and biased. You arent able to see things from a neutral perspective. Right and wrong for you, simply depends on the profession or gender or race of the people involved

@GMD, saw palmetto is confirmed negative for everyone, it doesnt really matter who. Just like poison will be bad for everyone, even though it may not be equally toxic to everyone. A quick google of saw palmetto side effects… will pull up numerous effects.

How do you know its AI?

CMI: “That's not news to him. He's a troll who routinely posts ridiculous points/arguments to stir shit and get attention.” If someone is arguing that you should avoid dancers or escorts with SO’s, its not really such a “wild take” that it counts as trolling/attention seeking by default. You’re acting like its a flat earth level argument, which is asylum level logic. Even besides the points I’ve previously mentioned, anytime youre dealing with a girl who has a SO, regardless of what her job is, you’re potentially entangling yourself in a situation where the SO is crazy/violent/vengeful. Some SO’s may not even be aware of and be okay with their girl being a dancer. So once again, not really such a “wild take” to avoid dancers with SOs. I would actually argue it should be the default take for anyone who so passionately posts about not outing extras dancers by name. One of the reasons commonly brought up is SOs lurking and snooping and finding out what a dancer is doing. Those SOs are also a risk to clients

^yeah just one of those status things. Its still a similar concept to getting women using money.

Her body is nice. Face is average

“I'm still surprised some people still don't get what I'm saying... Like I know I'm not gonna hook up with the dancer. That's not the point, the point is that option is open doesn't matter if my odds are freaking zero. The only way I'd think differently if it's some super model that I really like, she's type with the vibe, she's a pro and does stuff on the side.” So you’re convinced its not possible to hook up with a dancer? Its absolutely possible. Especially with cash involved. Even dancers who say no, would probably agree to some amount like 5k or 10k. Even if shes in a relationship, it doesnt mean shes not available to hook up with you.

If shes in a relationship, logic and probability dictates her dances will be lower mileage. Of course there can be exceptions. It doesnt really matter that she works at a strip club. That doesnt automatically mean she will provide proper lapdances, as the evidence shows there are numerous air dancer girls at these clubs. Hank provided an example above of a dancer cutting off ITC activities when in a relationship. The problem is, not every dancer is so honest. Some will just scam you, either via doing airdances, or making a deal for extras but not following through. Especially if youre new to clubs, and you care about extras or mileage level, its better to just entirely avoid dancers who have a SO. Also you have an easy way to find this out. See if shes open to something like DATY. If the answer is no, its almost certainly because of an SO. And it means there are no extras available besides maybe a mechanical HJ or cbj.

I dont think its healthy or natural for a guy to not be into large breasted wide hipped women. Theres been studies and biological reasons found behind why guys are attracted to those things. People likely had to be brainwashed into liking skinny women, although now its the reverse with people being brainwashed into liking BBWs. Comically large breast implants or ass implants aren’t attractive either.

Dolfan, on the contrary its you who doesnt know what youre talking about. Ive dealt with both escorts and dancers who have SO’s, whom are boyfriend pimps. Youre either an undercover boyfriend pimp, in love with a pimped dancer and delusional about the situation, or you just got lucky a few times with a few dancers here and there. There can always be exceptions to rules like this. I never said 100% of dancers with SO’s would have hangups and rules. Youre also bringing up completely irrelevant nonsense like married dancers being more punctual and on time than non married ones? First of all thats hilarious that you think their punctuality means anything. Secondly, youre being played. The reason the married dancers are so punctual is because theyre all business, because theyr clock watchers, and because if you pay them for an hour of service, they wont give you even a minute more for free because in their world, if they give you any free sex/extra free time its akin to cheating. I find it insane that you think the below paragraph of yours, even addresses my points. Im talking about these pimped dancers and escorts providing poor low quality service, and youre talking about their pathetic punctuality? In no way does this debunk anything I said. “Strippers in relationships in my experience are substantially more likely to show up on time and ready to go for OTC engagements. If anything, they're similar ITC too, but I have almost no problems with strippers not delivering ITC so I can't say they're substantially better than single girls since there really isn't really room for them to be much better. On the odd occasion they do have to cancel, they are infinitely more likely to tell me than the single girls who think its fine to just ghost.” So yeah, that said, ill continue providing genuine, logical advice that’s actually meant to help people, while you can take Icees approach and encourage people to visit dishonest girls with boyfriend pimps. To reiterate my points, a dancer or escort with an SO is more likely to be a clock watcher, more likely to provide shitty service, more likely to not allow daty, more likely to not cum with clients, more likely to not tongue kiss, more likely to be a scammer, more likely to be inclined away from getting banged and push the client towards bjs/hjs. Again you may get lucky and find a girl with an SO who somehow does provide all the GFE service standards, but chances are, more often than not, if youre with an SO girl theres a whole list of things she wont do, the experience will be extremely mechanical if not straight up scamming. For instance if you book a girl for an hour, and she only allows you to bang her for 20 minutes, you basically got scammed. This is all known info, you can even see dancers talking about it on the stripper subreddit and stripperweb or whatever the dancer oriented website was. Girls with SO’s often use different methods to differentiate work related sex with clients, from sex with their SO. And they do it by using the methods i mentioned earlier. The fact of the matter is, anyone who wants proper service worth paying for, would do best avoiding any girls with SOs. You’re probably better off avoiding even civvie girls with SOs. Im not paying money for subpar, subhuman service. The dancers with SOs are more likely to give airdances and scam dances too.

^Georg lol. Saw palmetto literally castrates man. Its called a 5 alpha reductase inhibitor. It’s basically a natural finasteride. If you actually have a microdong, the saw palmetto is definitely something that contributes. It worsens not just dong size but also function. Its one of the worst things a guy can take for anything. It’s basically chemical castration!

Thats incorrect Icey. Onlyfans chat system doesnt allow any discussion of doing meetups. In fact a buncj of onlyfans girls who are also escorts, constantly repeat that they are not able to discuss anything about meeting up on onlyfans, and you have to either email them or text them for that

I used to try to keep up with brazzers and bangbros new releases regularly, not to jerk off but mostly to see what new pornstars are out there. As far as jerking off to porn, only if its been weeks or even months without sex. I may google a pornstar and look at some pictures if its someone I haven’t seen before. Ive only been to 10 or so clubs, but to me the hottest pornstars are hotter than anyone ive seen at a club.

And yeah if you straight up ask them about having an SO, most will lie because many guys dont like hearing that. Its not something you find out from directly asking. It is something you can easily find out, by seeing if they allow you to eat their pussy or if they tongue kiss you. Chances are the dancers with SOs wont do those things.