discussion comment
6 years ago
Today is also quite nice. Might check out Club Madonna as it is less than a block from my AirBnb.
discussion comment
6 years ago
@LoneWolf, I don’t know. To answer that question honestly requires a PhD in the subject matter. Try tweeting Sean Carroll. (Or perhaps watch one of his YouTube videos, he may have already answered that question)
discussion comment
6 years ago
Yes, quantum computers are legit, I have a masters in physics.
No, using a quantum computer won’t make porn better. It won’t make video games look more realistic. It really won’t do much at all to speed up your day-to-day computer activities in any direct way.
The only thing amazing that it will do is solve extremely complex problems—problems that would take a regular supercomputer days, weeks, months, to compute—in significantly shorter time (seconds). The only way this could speed up typical computers is to use the quantum computer to solve problems in the field of computer technology research (like solving some huge problem to make transistors 10% better, and then manufacturing the new transistor).
discussion comment
6 years ago
![]()
gammanu95My casual drinking is your alcohol poisoning.
For those of us who view overweight as ugly (one in the same) then women are getting uglier.
discussion comment
6 years ago
![]()
gammanu95My casual drinking is your alcohol poisoning.
It’s not just you gammanu, and it’s not because of the porn. All you have to do is look at the BMI and obesity statistics and there is your objective, unbiased lens through which to see if women are truly getting uglier. And the answer? Yes, they are getting uglier. Teens are getting fatter, and college “nubiles” on average weigh about as much as I do... and i’m over 6’ tall.
It sucks. This is one reason why I made the thread about which countries are best for expats. Might be a good idea to move to Canada. Or some poor European country where the women are so poor they don’t eat and stay thin... maybe Maldova? Ukraine? Czech Republic? Prague?
discussion comment
6 years ago
I love TUSCL
discussion comment
6 years ago
![]()
IceyI put your ATF on a winning team
^^ are those blowjobs the ones you get in the slums of Kenya or Ethiopia?
discussion comment
6 years ago
SJG, do you have a brain in your head? Markets are not casinos, dumbass!
discussion comment
6 years ago
@skibum in the last 5 years the value of bitcoin has increased about 530%, whereas the value of those quarters has decreased about 7%. Hope you don’t throw away your bitcoins!
discussion comment
6 years ago
Disappointing, nobody here believes in Bitcoin.
discussion comment
6 years ago
@Random didn’t the fed announce recently that they’ve put QT on pause? I heard the consensus view is that the Fed might even start to lower rates.
discussion comment
6 years ago
![]()
IceyI put your ATF on a winning team
$10
discussion comment
6 years ago
I only have had sex in clubs in which sex in the VIP/back room is commonplace. I have not had sex in a club in which sex occurs very rarely.
discussion comment
6 years ago
^^ that, and Americans are too fat.
discussion comment
6 years ago
The problem with America is there are too many irresponsible stupid people who think they are smart, and too few responsible smart people who doubt themselves.
You see it every day on the news, hell even on this thread! People spouting off statistics like it proves their point. People who barely have a high school diploma quoting statistics, calculated by PhD economists and sociologists, that they read in a biased news article.
The problem is that people who talk too much don’t think, and the people who think a lot don’t talk enough.
discussion comment
6 years ago
![]()
san_jose_guymoney was invented for handing to women, but buying dances is a chump's game
12 of those... okay, let’s call them paragraphs... began with the word “so.”
discussion comment
6 years ago
@Founder, I saw in another thread that you enjoy programming. I’ve written in a few threads that it would be nice if there were additional statistics / metrics displayed on the club pages. Are you open to expanding on what you’ve already done with the 1-10 ratings? Perhaps other stats like standard deviations (of course, dumb it down and call it something like consistency or reliability), or a time weighted rating system (if you haven’t done that already) that weights more recent reviews more than old reviews. Or those “word clouds” that size the words according to their relative frequency in the reviews.
discussion comment
6 years ago
https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/fastats/body-measurements.htm
discussion comment
6 years ago
^^ No, not average, showing again that you are Loco! Average is 5'3" 170 lbs with retarded expressions.
discussion comment
6 years ago
Yin an Yang. Let's not be so narrow-minded.
"Today, in ecclesiastical circles, sex is being damned with faint praise. People are saying: “After all, yes, sex was made by God and we should remember the Jewish point of view. And it is perhaps for something more than reproduction. To bring about the cementing of the marriage ties between husband and wive. But, still, in practise, it remains the frightening taboo.” On the other hand, the opposition to Christian prudery goes overboard and always moves in the direction of total license. You see, what’s going on is a contest between the people who want the skirts pulled down to the floor and the people who want them pulled up to the neck. And you know you ‘got to draw the line somewhere. But the play between these forces is: where are we gonna draw it? Well that’s very exciting, provide neither side wins. I mean, imagine what it would be like if the libertines won and they took over the Church. So that on Wednesday evenings, the young Presbyterian group would meet for prayer-through-sex. Every child would go to the school physician for a course in hygienics and they’d have classes and they’d have plastic models and all the children would do it in class in very clean hygienic circumstances, all sprayed with rubbing alcohol. Imagine how boring it would all become! So you see, the people who say “No, modesty is important!” have something right about them. But they mustn’t be allowed to get away with it. But they mustn’t be obliterated. See, life works that way." - Alan Watts
discussion comment
6 years ago
![]()
TJ LeeThe ultimate strip clubs goer.
"But that's where the sense of entitlement comes in. He thinks he's too good for what he can get and feels deserving of something better just because he wants it."
- That may be true for the 27-year-old virgin shooter, but it's not generally true for all people who would refuse to have sexual relations with a "4". Choosing to pass on a sexual encounter is not indicative of an attitude of entitlement. In the same way, turning down an offer of free food is not indicative of an attitude of entitlement. Pursuing happiness is a right here in the United States: "We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness."
"free ice cream!"---"no thank you, I don't eat sweets (I have diabetes)"
"free roller coaster ride"---"no thank you, I don't enjoy riding roller coasters"
"free sex with me"---"no thank you, I don't find you physically attractive"
"minimum wage job offer"---"no thank you, I prefer a life of subsistence living"
"minimum wage job offer"---"no thank you, I have enough savings I can afford to wait for a higher offer"
"high wage job offer"--"no thank you, I still prefer a life of subsistence living!"
"free hand gun"---"no thank you, too dangerous"
Is a person "entitled" to food that is "better" than ice cream if he/she/they turns it down? Is a person "entitled" to... not riding a roller coaster... if he/she/they turn it down? That doesn't even make sense!
Think, IceyLoco! Don't be so loco!
discussion comment
6 years ago
![]()
TJ LeeThe ultimate strip clubs goer.
“There is no reason why these guys can't just fuck 4s or lower.”
- I wouldn’t fuck a 4 or lower even if I was in the middle of a decade long dry spell. My dick might shrink down just from the sight of her, as if I was outside in -30 degree weather and my balls just crawl back into my abdomen. As DC said, there are hookers out there who are stunningly beautiful.
discussion comment
6 years ago
![]()
TJ LeeThe ultimate strip clubs goer.
@DC, yes I agree that money doesn't provide a direct route vers la chatte, except when used to pay for prostitutes. I think that great wealth does, however, provide an indirect route, but perhaps not the way people often imagine. I don't think it happens so often that: woman meets man, woman learns that man is wealthy, woman sleeps with man because he's wealthy. Or even: woman meets man, man buys woman many gifts, woman sleeps with man (hell, I'd bet that hardly ever happens!) Rather, I think great wealth provides so many perks in life that getting laid is just plain easier; it requires less effort. I mean, life itself is less of an effort for those who have already acquired wealth. The process of acquiring the wealth, for sure, usually requires great effort (excepting those trust fund babies). But once you've got it, I imagine it must be hard to resist the temptation of spoiling yourself!
One thing I've noticed about myself is that I do better with women when my responsibilities are less. In particular, it was far easier to develop social connections and attract women during summer vacations and during those early times in college semesters when there was hardly any homework to do and no tests to study for. I had no worries! I was fed and sheltered through no effort of my own, except for some part-time low wage jobs. How much different life feels now that I have a full-blown career that requires my constant attention, as well as bills to pay, food to prepare, errands to run, etc. (and I'm probably quite lazy compared to others in my field who are married with kids).
So, I imagine that there is a minority of young and middle-aged men who 1) are millionaires, 2) work few hours, 3) use their money to streamline their lives and reduce the number of their responsibilities, and 4) spend a significant portion of their waking hours pursuing and attracting women. Whether it is through spending hours in the gym every day, spending hours expanding their social network every day, or spending hours meeting, dating, and attracting new women in clubs/malls/bars/conventions etc. every day, they are spending those hours for those purposes, while the lower and middle classes spend most of their hours surviving.
I suspect that this incel/redpill/mgtow subculture is most prevalent in the law-abiding lower and middle classes who strive to live healthy, settled lives. The minority of men who DON'T abide by the law, and who engage in relatively toxic and violent behavior, provide a level of excitement (albeit a very different kind of excitement than that provided by the wealthy) that gets the right type of woman's panties sufficiently wet. Biker gangs come to mind, and there are definitely women out there who fantasize about being the biker gang slut.
Either way, it comes down to how men spend their time; a man is what he does. To provide a sweeping generalization that is without nuance: the "nice guys" who need more attaboys spend their time working, and the "bad boys" dominate through violence, disobedience, and (financial) leverage, and thus spend their time maintaining their harems.
discussion comment
6 years ago
This is precisely why I wear nice clothes to the clubs; it creates the illusion that I actually have some money haha. Thank god they can't look at my accounts!
discussion comment
6 years ago
![]()
TJ LeeThe ultimate strip clubs goer.
"As for the 1950s thing, I'd argue that the comparative extreme promiscuity of people in the modern age is exactly why it was easier in the 1950s. Losing your virginity is nothing, it doesn't actually mean much, its about whether you can continue getting sex on some kind of regular basis or whether you end up having like two hookups for the entire year and don't get any sex outside of that. The social elite just doesn't think about it that way because getting laid is easy to them so high levels of promiscuity in their eyes means getting to fuck whenever you want, with whoever you want. The reality for everyone else, however, is that rampant promiscuity means that almost all the girls are going for the guys in the social elite and you get the scraps. So essentially, you get maybe one or two one time hookups per year and that's it.
With less promiscuity, girls fuck a guy and then they stay and continue to have sex with that guy. The social elite gets to be mildly promiscuous, having a fling or two on the side of their main girl, but everyone else gets to have one woman they can rely on to like them and want to have sex with them. In the 1950s, if you managed to lose your virginity you could probably continue having an active sex life as long as you wanted because girls back then wanted a commitment."
- Which came first, the promiscuity, the reason for the promiscuity, or the illusion of greater promiscuity?
Seems to me like the combination of extreme wealth inequality, public awareness through social media, and instant gratification, has the effect of increasing promiscuity, especially in women. Why? Because in the 1950s, there were no social media, MTV, Million Dollar Cribs TV shows, so the apparent access to super walthy men was thin to none. And there wasn't any social media to be addicted to, so people weren't constantly comparing themselves to others, women weren't comparing their boyfriends to others, etc. And, of course, no porn! Both men, AND WOMEN, had no access to streaming 1080p harcore pornography... the most they had was a rare photograph of a person in a swimsuit, or a playboy magazine, which nowadays is considered virtually harmless. Not to say that pornography is a bad thing (hell, those ISIS guys would probably be way more calm if they were like a lot of the guys here and jacked off to some porn every couple of days), but the combination is probably not very positive for both sexes. A lot of men and women nowadays (mostly men) learn about sex, not by engaging in it, but by watching videos of others on an LCD screen. Essentially, both men and women have become more aware, and conscious, of their position on the social ladder, as well as the position of others on that ladder... and these extreme behaviors are the manifestation of our animal instincts reacting to such awareness. What else would cause a young man to snap, and go on a shooting rampage, than the very real illusion of forever being at the bottom rungs of the social ladder, with no money and no status to ever catch the attention of an even mildly attractive woman? Sounds rather bleak, doesn't it? The problem, I think, is that this illusion is more than a mere illusion... it's a self-fulfilling thing. The illusion creates the anxiety which produces the behaviors that further enhance the illusion. I'm sure these incel shootings don't reflect very positively on young men, low on the social ladder. How are women supposed to respond? By rushing to every poor young man and sucking their dicks? No, they're probably more inclined to run the hell away! And what does that do but enchance the illusion for young men that they will remain single and sexless.
My guess is, as you said, just like income inequality, there may be greater inequality in sexual activity (partially caused by the income inequality). The likes of JohnSmith and gawker can fuck hot 22 yr olds because of their wealth. Was it always so easy? I would guess not, because wealth was not as unequal as it is today.