“Too explicit”

As long as you DO NOT give the dancers names if you got extras you will be OK.

I agree with @DickyDoo2 that the paramount thing is not connecting a dancer's real name (or identifying qualities like tatoos) to any extras. I think this is important whether the club is in a jurisdiction where it's legal or not.

The problem is, there's no clear elaboration of that rule anywhere on the site (AFAIK). So some people just assume reviews are not allowed to be explicit at all.

It means nothing and they might as well get rid of it nobody cares. I'm for no mention of anything other than a lapdance going on ITC for any reason in public on the board.

Even if you don't drop a public name that protects the club. Plus I have no idea what extras what dancer will do for who. YMMV anyway so why post details, are we kids? Read between the damn lines. Keep the particulars in the PMs IMO.

But again nobody cares.

As far as protecting the clubs goes it does not make sense. There are a number of others sites where the posters go into graphic detail on the activities and out the dancers. If this were a problem all of these clubs would be shut down. It actually brings them more business. LE makes a show on occasion just to make the public think they are doing their job, so unless there are drug deals and shootings at the clubs LE just looks the other way.

Stating what you did with a dancer, the price and HER NAME is too explicit for me all the time. I don't care about LE, but I do care about impacting another's job. Let us say that one of our fellow posters is a big fan of a dancer, who has "limits" and somehow she has no "limits" with you, an occasional customer. Posting about your experience fucks up another's experience and could harm her ability to make money. Its also useless, since ymmv. Also, what is great, differs from person to person. # people at saturday night poker actually fucking threw down during a cigarette break over who makes the best gravy in the area. If you're Italian you know what I mean by gravy, but I was left wondering if they'd have shot each other over a stripper, given the reaction to food.

I have gotten that and seen that numerous times even without dancer names mentioned. Some people basically dont want you going in depth and descriptive with the sexual activities

It's less about "protecting" the clubs (most of whom are probably greasing both the mayor and the police chief's palms) and more about...

1. Not giving the local press ammo with which to attack all strip clubs in the city, because they will.
2. Not getting the girl in trouble with management, other girls (who are jealous), bf's, jealous fellow PLs that are pissed she did that for you and not for him.

Everyone knows things go on. Keeping it on the DL and keeping heat off the club, girls, and custies, lets the fun continue unabated.

When in doubt, go to PM.

For whatever reason the post fucked up my comment. Maybe because it was a bullet list?

Not giving the local press ammo to put the heat on all strip clubs in the city. Not getting the girl in trouble with the management, catty fellow dancers, jealous bf's, and other customers who are sore she did that with you and not her, or charged him more, and unlike us don't understand how the game works.

The general rule is, everyone knows what's going on, but keeping it on the down low and not bringing heat on anyone keeps the good times rolling.

When in doubt, PM.

Son of a fucking bitch. Is TUSCL now cutting off all posts longer than 2 lines?

Quick version until it's fixed. Everyone knows what goes on. Keeping it on the DL keeps good times rolling. When in doubt, PM.

In general, dancers want more business. They may or may not want their name posted online and connected to extras, but, assuming the guy is safe and all, they want more business.

People in general have an ego problem, perhaps men even more so… and a lot of guys dont want to talk about which dancers give extras because theyre possessive and in love with a dancer. A lot of guys also want to believe that they are the only client a dancer is seeing OTC, or that the dancer is “extremely selective” with who she sees OTC and the guy is part of an elite class of guys who are able to see the dancer OTC.

Its true that you shouldnt be posting a dancers name online and connecting to extras.. unless she explicitly wants you to do it. But i suspect for a lot of posters here, they are possessive with their OTC dancers.

I'll get the cut off comments fixed later today

Some of our fellow PLs are only a tiny increment above being prudes. Some think they're protecting the girls, the clubs and even us. Some are just stupid. That last category includes the ones who try to reject my articles for being too explicit. Moronic.

I only hit it when named dancers are tied to extras. They almost always get approved anyway

I understand jealous bfs are a possibility… and catty dancers are a possibility… but its also very possible most of these dancers bfs know what they are doing.. and other dancers also know

At least according to stripperweb and r/stripper, a lot of tnese dancers discuss boundaries with their bfs. As far as dancer not doing something with one guy but not with another.. it could be a heat of the moment thing, a hygiene issue, or a conscious choice on her part to do it with one guy but not another. That last part gets exaggerated often, because it involves ego

“TOO EXPLICIT” aka please don’t provide the content that 90% are on this site to discover LOL

Some Pls are cfrass and stupid (SGray). Some have the penis and mentality of an 8th grader (SGray). Some are not real men and have to dime others out to pretend they are ...guess who that fucking is? By the way too explicit means - too immature, weak, childish impotent and stupid. Fuck off.

I thought not naming names was good enough but I've gotten bitched at about describing a dancer who gave me a cbj. Some think talking in code is unnecessary. I think it's hilarious to say Uptown Girl and Tom Ford cologne collection.

I doubt law enforcement has the resources to monitor tuscl then do sting operations based on comments (that should all be considered a work of fiction btw). But I do think being too explicit could result in repercussions for the dancer from the SC or the club implenting changes that affect mileage.

I love the tasty details but I understand you can't put them on blast.

The first thing I'd say is that if you haven't noticed, everyone has their own opinion on it. There are no hard and fast rules. There are the guidelines that founder put out, which are viewable if you click the little view guidelines button while writing a review.

It's a widely held opinion, though not universal, that linking a particular dancer to extras is too explicit. Again generally but not universally this includes names and enough of a description to uniquely identify a dancer. Some people apply this guideline more strictly than others; some consider things like abbreviations and code a valid "work around. " An example of that might be "Sta** sang Billy Joel covers in the VIP" Depending on the opinions of your adjudicators, you may get some responses that indicate your review is too explicit.

You can take that feedback and adjust your reviews to be less explicit in these areas, and likely see less negative votes as a result. Or you can rebel against the tyranny and continue to submit reviews that push the envelope of what's generally accepted, and likely see more of those comments and perhaps get rejected a few times. That's up to you.

There are tons of threads around here regarding the pros and cons of naming names if you're interested in reading the opinions of others in the community. Be warned, as you can see from this thread the conversations here tend to quickly devolve into name calling and often feature reductio ad absurdum, straw men, and other similar forms of arguments.

My personal opinion is that there's little value in being explicit. A review that says bubbles the 24 year old 5' 5" 127lb red hed with the hello kitty tattoo on her left thigh and c-cup implants with visible scars gave me a bareback blow job and let me fuck her in multiple positions while wearing a condom isn't much more informative to me than a review that says there were some mid-twenties slim girls with a couple tattoos that lived up to all her promises in the room. For me, the second one conveys everything a potential customer needs to know while at the same time avoiding the pitfalls others cite as reasons not to be explicit.

I also find code to be useless. I don't even know what uptown girl and tom ford cologne means. But maybe I'm just not cool.

^You're right, so cool is irrelevant.

Years ago, one of the girls I would see fairly regularly asked me about the other site. She asked what guys said and if I ever talked about her. I told her, truthfully, that in my reviews I would mention her and say that we have a good time in conversation or in VIP She said, "Next time tell them what a great BBBJ I give you". I was surprised and said, "Are you sure" She said, "I do give you a great BBBJ don't I?" I said, "Yes you do and yes I will" A couple weeks later, she came over to me and said Thanks. Since I made the comment she's had 6 or 8 new customers.

Years ago, one of the girls I would see fairly regularly asked me about the other site. She asked what guys said and if I ever talked about her. I told her, truthfully, that in my reviews I would mention her and say that we have a good time in conversation or in VIP She said, "Next time tell them what a great BBBJ I give you". I was surprised and said, "Are you sure" She said, "I do give you a great BBBJ don't I?" I said, "Yes you do and yes I will" A couple weeks later, she came over to me and said Thanks. Since I made the comment she's had 6 or 8 new customers.

I try not to explicitly say but if I say the club doesn’t care and that it’s between you and the girl and that I liked someone it should be enough to let someone know that there are possibilities.

Now if it’s something on the floor that other patrons can and do see go ahead and say it. They’re not trying to hide it. In private just knowing it’s a possibility should be enough. Unless it’s a straight out brothel we should be expecting to ask and negotiate. Most clubs don’t have standardized prices for extras that everyone accepts.