Ejaculating During a Dance
I go commando with thin nylon pants. I've "came" many times with dancers and usually do a good job (i think) of hiding it until the dance is over with my shirt or asking them to shake in front of me or something. Anyway, is that odd? Do dancers notice it/ say anything about it? Also, I found myself feeling the urge to cum last night and I grabbed her off of me in an unsuspecting way because I don't think I think she would have noticed it this time. I was a little upset that i missed out. Just looking for your opinions on this matter. ThanksGot something to say?
Start your own discussion
62 comments
Latest
I think it's better for them because as they can get you to a certain point at the end of a song their chances of getting another one is pretty damn good.
When I have an orgasm in the club, it is because I am engaging in some form of sexual activity -- a BJ or intercourse. And in that case, I am wearing a condom, for obvious reasons. So I am not cumming in my pants, thank god. Instead, I'm cumming in her mouth or in her pussy. And while I never thought of it this way before, I guess one of the added benefits of wearing a condom is that my cum stays in the condom and doesn't get on anyone's clothing. Again, ick.
It sounds like you guys are saying that instead of having sex, you are cumming by having the girl rub you through your clothes. To which I have a simple question: WTF?!?!? Why don't you just have sex like a normal person?
Help me out people I am really perplexed by this. Please don't tell me you are going to strip clubs so the girls can get you off through your clothing. I don't think I've cum that way since high school. Someone please throw me a bone (no pun intended).
If the club won't let you have sex, then I would not remain in that club. I am willing to give a new place a try for a little bit (maybe 30 minutes or so max), but if it's not producing any mileage, forget it. 22 lapdances -- that's $440 minimum where I come from -- for nothing more than soiling my pants? Why? For $440 I better be having sex. And yes, that's going to require pulling down my pants. Honestly for $440 you can hire a very nice escort who will meet you in a hotel room and spend an hour or more with you boning in every possible way. I am not going to pick on someone who pays for sex, but I think it is ridiculous to pay for nothing. Don't you want to have sex with these girls? Then why don't you?
Sex is not available at every club, obviously, but you can usually figure out pretty quickly which ones provide it and which ones don't -- if not from a site like this, then certainly with a visit. Again, I think the picture is usually crystal clear within 30 minutes of arrival. Within a few minutes you'll be asked for a dance, and in the first couple dances you can find out what the dancers think the club rules are. If sex is banned, then leave (unless all you want is to look at girls dancing in their underwear).
If sex is available at the club, I think it is silly to suggest you need to get to know the girl well. You only need to know if she is providing extras for sale, or not. If so, the only thing she's going to want to know about you is whether you can pay the freight. When I have had sex with the girls in the clubs (which is most of the time, since I avoid clubs where it is banned), it has happened within 5 minutes of meeting the right girl. It is just a question of finding the right girl at the right club -- once you've found each other, there's no need for a lengthy courtship.
This thing about getting drained of cash at the ATM is especially weird to me. If the club is such a ripoff, then leave. Go to an escort or at least an AMP and just have sex. It won't cost any more and it will be way more satisfying. If you keep blowing your wad in your pants, apart from the laundry bills, you are going to render yourself sexually dysfunctional, because when you finally do have sex, you'll be a premature ejaculator.
All together now: Stop cumming in your pants! Start having sex!
Having said that, I strongly suspect even in your region you will be able to find decent escorts. I would suggest looking at TER, which has one of the best search engines you will ever find. If you are going to spend $440, even in the NYC area, you could get a 2 hour session with a very very attractive escort that would include every sex act imaginable, with the possible exception of greek (there it will depend on the escort). Frankly, I suspect prices are lower where you live, so for that kind of money you could get a session that would be really memorable. In the friendliest way possible, I am suggesting that that would be a much more satisfying experience.
Maybe we are just in a different place in life, but there was a thread about this a short while ago (why go to strip clubs), and I fell firmly into the "I do it for sex" camp. If the girls in the clubs stopped providing sex, I would stop going.
And I think it all depends on the club. For those that say that most dancers expect it to happen, I would disagree. I too have talked about this with my ATF and it is pretty infrequent in her club. I have known her for a long time and she is pretty honest with me and she says it has only happed to her twice in her 8 years of dancing. Both from guys who apparently had zero control and lost it immediately.
As for the mess, here's what I do. Sit in the club, look around, till I'm feeling a little firm. Go to restroom, roll on a raincoat. Go get some dances. AFterward, return to restroom to remove the raincoat. I've had the experience of getting in the car and shoving paper towels down my pants, then the next day dropping my suit off at the dry cleaners, hoping my wife didn't smell it in the closet. Oh, and walking into my fancy hotel holding a jacket in front of me. No fun. Wear a rubber.
- In Phoenix, I get it from my GF. But in the SC's, there is no chance of real sex, and very little chance of whipping it out. The only way to cum is in your pants, covered or not.
- In NJ, go to a dive tittie bar, meet a girl, tell her what you want. High probability of success.
- In Tijuana....
I do agree with njscfan about the SC versus escort bang-for-the-buck comparison. As many of us know, our little brain is an impulse buyer and a poor money manager.
The pledge to have more sex is a good one.
Look, I agree that the idea of cumming in my pants is not entirely the best option that I can think of, and I don't think that's ever even happened to me. But, obviously not everyone that goes to a strip club is looking for sex or even comfortable with the idea of having sex with a complete stranger (either in or out of a club). I have no problem going to a club and just looking at and interacting with naked or nearly naked women that happen to be attractive to me. I'm not going to spend a ton of money doing it though, and I can't fully understand the cumming in the pants vibe & why it might be satisfying to people...but to each his own I think.
The idea that someone has been going to strip clubs for a long time and hasn't even heard of guys cumming in their pants during a LD is just silly to me. NJ sucks...Canada and RI rule...it's all legal there baby...there are other places too...
With regard to the original thread, no, I actually had no idea guys were cumming in their pants at strip clubs. The thought never occurred to me. I guess you guys are doing a pretty good job of hiding those wet spots on your nylon shorts. Kudos. Obviously, you're right, not everyone goes to clubs to have sex (some of the people on this site cannot have sex, sadly). But the guys who are cumming in their pants obviously want "something," and personally I am finding it difficult to understand why they don't get the real thing. Being a heterosexual guy, when I see a goodlooking nearly naked woman, my first thought is "I'd like to have sex with her." My first thought is not, "I'd like to bust a nut in my underwear." But as you say, different strokes for different folks (sorry for the pun).
But then, alas, you have to go and attack my adopted home state of New Jersey, a state that can proudly boast of Bruce Springsteen, Frank Sinatra and an ex-Governor who had three way sex with his wife and an aide (read today's paper). NJ sucks and Canada and RI rule, you say? Well, I've never been to SCs in Canada or RI, but you have, so let's look at your reviews (all quotes are your words; everything else is a fair summation of your words):
Satin Dolls (RI) -- the dancers wouldn't even talk to you
Chez Paree (Canada) -- "notoriously low contact"; no prolonged interaction
Super Sexe (Canada) -- "notoriously low contact"; you never got a dance
Gentleman's Choice (Canada) -- you didn't get a dance
Balloons (RI) -- $300 for 2 lapdances where you couldn't even touch the girls' breasts and you got a "dry HJ"
Studio 253 (RI) -- "self-service" only
Mickey's Valley View Pub (RI) -- you will "never find any extras at this place"
Desire (RI) -- $125 for a 15 minute dance and you got to touch the girl's pussy
Cadillac (RI) -- 1 dance; grinding only
Club L'Entre Neus (Canada) -- you gave this a "2" rating; the dancers are all "old" and "ugly"
Cheaters (RI) -- you did not get a dance
Les Belles De Nuit (Canada) -- you gave this a "1" rating; the dancers were "old, fat and homely"; extras were "not allowed"
Bar Le Gentleman (Canada) -- one of the few places you really liked; you said FS was $200; unclear if you partook
Desire (RI) -- you could rub your face on the dancer's breasts; you did not get a lapdance
Club Fantasies (RI) -- $130 in the VIP room could get you "full touching"
Satin Dolls (RI) -- you got 2 dances with "grinding" and you got to "peek inside their thongs"; but there were no extras
Sportsman Inn (RI) -- you gave this place a "1"; you said one girl flashed her breasts and her "box" at you
Chez Diane (Canada) -- this is another place you liked, but again it was not 100% clear what you got here. Your review said the lap dances were "full contact!" which suggests they were not "full service".
Bar Le Gentlemen (Canada) -- you say FS is available for $200, but it's unclear if you actually tried it
Club 35-10 (Canada) -- you were offered to lick a girl's nipples for $20 (you turned this offer down)
Club Downtown (Canada) -- another place you liked, but again it's unclear what is on the menu, if anything
Club Wandas (Canada) -- "NO CONTACT" dances
Club Super Contact (Canada) -- some contact is available here
Le Chateau due Sexe (Canada) -- the "contact" here does not include touching the pussy, which is prohibited
Cabaret Sex Appeal (Canada) -- same; you can't even touch the pussy
Hill Top (RI) -- FS is supposedly available (as usual, one can't tell if you actually tried it); during lapdances you can't touch the pussy
According to your own blog, in Montreal the strip clubs "won't tolerate" extras anymore.
Honestly, my friend, but the mileage appears to be pretty low in RI and Canada according to your reviews. Touching a girl's breasts or pussy don't count as "extras" in my book; that's called foreplay.
Dude, come on down to Jersey. Wondergrl and I will give you a tour of the high mileage clubs. And I promise you won't have to cum in your pants.
Your friend
njscfan
Now let's *really* stack up the details...
RI:
Satin Doll - I've had plenty of LDs here, and they were all two-way contact. They even have a newer room here now where it appears that anything goes.
Balloons - it's on wondergrl's ROB listing I believe...courtesy of me. Although, the no breast touch issue was in the LD area, not the VIP area.
Desire - way more mileage can definitely be had here than I got.
Cheaters - this place is *hugely* notorious for high mileage...you just have to find someone that tickles your fancy is all...read a few more reviews of the place.
Club Fantasies - certain extras (usually short of FS) are common here with plenty of dancers.
That says nothing of all the AMPs in RI that provide a full range of "extra" activity...depending on where you go.
Canada:
Bar Le Gentleman - this is a FS strip club...anything goes.
Chez Diane - another FS strip club...anything goes.
Hill Top - yet another FS strip club...anything goes, even Greek.
It is indeed very hard to find any "extras" in downtown Montreal strip clubs anymore, which is why you should try the escort scene there instead.
For you, it's obviously all about the sex, which is fine...but I think that you really come off like an ass when you look down your nose at other people who might not be all about the sex. I can testify that is possible to have fun during a session with a dancer...either having sex with her or not.
Why don't you actually try out a few clubs in Canada and/or RI, where everything that you would want to do in a club is LEGAL? No need to worry about embarrasing yourself or going to jail...ever... NJ sucks...for many, many other reasons besides the very odd strip club scene down there IMO.
I do not begrudge anyone who does not want to have sex in the clubs. That's not my approach, obviously, but it does not bother me if someone prefers to spend their money just so that a young girl will talk to him.
But THIS thread (as the topic title indicates) is actually about cumming in your pants, for chrissake. The guys who are doing that are obviously looking for more than "friendship" or socializing -- they want to get their nut off. And from all the posts on this site, that is obviously not an accidental or incidental occurrence. You have guys putting on nylon shorts in the dead of winter; pulling their dicks out of their underwear; sticking paper towels down their pants; and going thru all sorts of elaborate measures so they can drop a load in their pants. It is this particular behavior that I am struggling hard to understand.
I feel genuine sympathy for someone who feels that is their only option. As a man myself, I feel bad seeing my fellow men engaging in behavior that must feel at least a little degrading, at least some of the time. Even some of the posters on this thread have talked about feeling "shame." So I feel bad for them, but I do not understand why they do it.
I guess the response is that cumming in your pants is the only thing available in some parts of the country. If true, respectfully, I would urge the cum-in-your-pants-crowd (to be distinguished from the no-sex-in-the-club-crowd) to go on strike. You obviously want sex if you are cumming in your pants. So insist on it. If the club bans it, stop going. I bet they will re-think their business strategy if they lose customers.
Meanwhile, why not save your time and money for real sex, either with a civilian or an escort? No matter where you live there must be some girls who are willing to fuck. But I would not let someone manipulate me into paying $$$$ for the pleasure of soiling myself. Cumming in your pants is not a substitute for sex.
Related to this, by the way (a topic for a completely different thread, I guess) is how many guys in clubs are just really awkward and uncomfortable around women, and so use strip clubs as a substitute for a regular romantic life. I have been getting sad stories about guys who are paying money for the most meager rewards -- a little feel of the boobs, a goodnight kiss with an ATF after dinner, etc. Again, I don't blame any girl for making a living the best way she can in this cruel world, but I feel pretty lousy for the guys if they are being used like that. If this represents a significant portion of the club going population, then that would go a long way to explaining why some guys are putting up with what otherwise should be obviously manipulative bullshit. I would urge those guys to stand up for themselves. You are entitled to a rich and full sex life, not a crummy substitute for one.
If you can't get laid in a FS Canadian strip club, you either can't get laid anywhere or you don't want to get laid, period. I won't be looking for you...so don't look for me. You can send your wife though...just kidding... ;)
If you ever figure out what's going thru the minds of the "drop a load in their pants" crowd, you let us know...I don't have a clue about that either...maybe some people like the "shame" of it...who knows...
"There were a fair amount of girls . . . but not one dancer came up to say
anything to me...even when I tipped at the railing! . . . It looked like
there might have been a fair amount of "activity" going on from what I
could see under the drapes though."
This was really code language for what you meant to say, which was:
"As soon as I walked in I was mobbed by about 5 girls, all 10s, ranging in
age from 18 to 19 years old. They tore off my clothes and raped me on the
spot."
Thanks for the clarification. And you're right, I'm not in your league. Guess I'll just have to keep clubbing in the seedy environs of Joisey. Sniff.
Well said snowtime...I still don't like the "cum in the pants" option though.
Guys I am not understanding this post, or the responses for that matter. Are you actually saying some guys have sex in the club? Ick. Don't you get cum all over your dancer? Why do you do that -- I don't get it? Perhaps it's because I am a slightly, ahem, more mature gentleman (i.e., past 40), but I don't think I would ever come close to orgasm by having a woman blow me in a public setting where I kept all my clothes on. Can you guys really cum that easily?
When I have an orgasm in the club, it is because I am engaging in consecutive lap dances. And in that case, I am not wearing a condom, for obvious reasons. So I am not cumming in her mouth, thank god. Instead, I'm cumming in my pants. And while I never thought of it this way before, I guess one of the added benefits of not wearing a condom is that my cum can spew freely instead of in a gross condom that needs to be disposed of. Again, ick.
It sounds like you guys are saying that instead of cumming by having the girl rub you through your clothes, you are having sex. To which I have a simple question: WTF?!?!? Why don't you just cum in your pants like a normal person?
Help me out people I am really perplexed by this. Please don't tell me you are going to strip clubs so the girls can get you off through illegal acts. Clubbing for old guys is like pretending your in high school. Someone please throw me a bone (no pun intended).
Rather than attack you personally (even though you have basically just called me a liar, twice now), I will simply point out to you that it is possible I am having different experiences in the clubs than you are. I think you might consider the possibility that your experience is not the same as that of every other man. You believe, for example, that you know I am lying about the sex available in clubs in NJ, even though you have never lived in NJ (and even though there are some 125 clubs listed in NJ just for tuscl alone). But somehow you know what is happening on every night in every club in the entire state. You also believe this even though there are other reviews on this very site by other patrons stating they had sex in the same clubs; I guess they're lying too. You also believe that you know what happened to every patron in every club on every night in Washington, D.C. over 20 years ago -- and that absolutely no one's experience could be any different than your experience. I think merely to state the proposition reveals how arrogant the underlying conceit is. Just because you're not having sex does not mean that no one else is.
As for your ATF, I believe you have described her as being in her 20s or 30s, so I think that would disqualify her from having any knowledge about what was or was not happening in the clubs in the mid-1980s, since she would not have been an adult at the time. Like I said, I am biting my tongue in this response, so I won't comment further about your repeated references to your ATF. But it takes a certain amount of hubris to think that because you know some dancers you therefore know what has happened to every patron in every club over a period of years. Honestly, has it ever occurred to you that perhaps -- just perhaps -- the dancers you think are your "friends" (but to whom you have to give $$$ so they will spend time with you) are actually just telling you what they think you want to hear? Did it ever occur to you that a girl you pay money to in a strip club just might not be telling you about everything she does with other customers?
It seems you take especial offense at people who use the clubs as a venue for sex. You have, in various posts, suggested that it is only possible in "seedy" environs, that there is something wrong with having sex with "strangers," and of course that anyone who claims to be having sex (when you're not) must be lying. I think it is odd that on a site like this of all places we would find people who are judgmental about having sex with strippers. Personally I would not use a strip club as a social life, and would not delude myself into thinking that I am "friends" with people who use me as an ATM. But it doesn't bother me if that's the satisfaction some guys get out of going to clubs; life can be lonely, after all, and who am I to judge someone who needs companionship, however procured. By the same token, I don't see why you are judgmental about guys who like to have sex with lots of different girls, and who use strip clubs as a convenient venue for achieving that goal.
I don't care what other guys do in clubs but I do get annoyed when others criticize those of us who prefer to keep things legal. I'll point out one more time the obvious - illegal activities in clubs provide easy ammunition to those in our society who would like to see strip clubs put out of business.
Personally, lap dances have never pushed me over the edge before. They've been enjoyable, but it just hasn't been enough.
That however doesn't mean that I have experienced this topic from both perspectives.
I went to a club in a nearby city -- one that is well known for extras -- and maybe I was naive or maybe I just didn't think about it but as I was getting some oral satisfaction, the dancer would periodically stop what she was doing to make sure Big Brother outside wasn't looking in. Well, she stopped one time just as I was at the edge, and since you can't stop nature, it caused quite a mess in my shorts.
I planned ahead after that in this club and if the dancer wouldn't allow CIM, then I would have a napkin or towel to clean up. This eliminated the problem.
I went to another club and got a dance from a girl that was known for giving HJ and BJ in the private dance area. Sure enough, she pulled it right out and started to go to work. When the time came (sic), she caught it all in her hand and I have no idea what she did with it after that.
I've never had that kind of experience at the best club near my house, even though the girls are notorious for giving some serious stick-shifting during the dances. The streak ended awhile back when I met a new dancer who told me I was too serious. I jokingly told her it was her job to make me happy. When we went into the dance area, she whispered in my ear that she was really going to make me happy, proceeding to continually rub ole junior throughout the entire dance. When I realized that I was about to cum, I told her to back off but she broke into a huge smile and tugged all the harder.
A week later at the same club, I half-jokingly told another favorite dancer that the problem with this club was that the girls could never finish the deal (because of the openness of the private area). Now she had danced for me at least a dozen times before but for the first time, she seem challenged and told me that if I wanted to drop a nut, she would make sure it happened. I stopped her because I didn't want a mess but ever since, I don't go in the place without a cover (it has come in handy a number of times, including the one and only time one of the girls told me that she was feeling horny and and agreed to get me off if I got her first. After a good fingering, she quite conspicuously pulled me out and screwed my brains out just 10 feet from a bouncer and a half dozen other dancers - it was a great experience).
Bottom line: I prefer to avoid the mess but some times, it is unavoidable.
First, it is not legal to be masturbated in exchange for money. In pretty much every jurisdiction, prostitution is paying for "sexual acts." Sexual acts, in turn, are very broadly defined, and almost always include masturbation. So, if you pay a girl to masturbate you -- even if it is through your pants -- it is prostitution, and you have violated the law. That's why it is just as illegal to get a handjob at an AMP as it is to get a blowjob. You do not need to have skin to skin contact. Nor does it matter whether you climax or not, by the way. I repeat: if you pay a girl to masturbate you, then you have violated your state's prohibition against prostitution. Thus, the cum-in-the-pants people (or even the rub-the-dick-through-the-pants people) are just as in violation of the law as the old fashioned let's-have-sex crowd. The only way to keep it legal in the club is to avoid all sexual activity, whether your dick is out or not. If FONDL just watches, then he's legal. But as soon as someone fondles FONDL's dick, then he has violated the law, same as when the girl who road Cleveland Tom's Johnson.
But more importantly, FONDL's argument is disingenuous. We all know perfectly well that people are not cumming in their pants because of a legal analysis. They are doing it because they feel it is the best they can get, for whatever reason. No one on this site who is busting a nut in his shorts would turn down a handjob, blowjob or full service if it were offered.
When we are talking about cumming during a lap dance, are we talking about an actual lap dance or are we talking extras: HJ, BJ, FS, etc... Beacause of all the hundreds (or thousands ??) of dances I have had, I have never, ever been close to cumming. I would be shocked if guys actually can cum from just some dry rubbing.
I wasn't sure what she meant but soon did. As she danced, she systematically removed the cover, leaving me with the decision to be happy or leave unhappy.
I'll keep my decision to myself but I will share the funny part.
When I was finished with the dance, I looked all over the place but couldn't find the misplaced cover. I have no idea what happened to it.
in most cases we all go for a different experience, me personally i like the idea of cumming in your pants in a lap dance and it has happend to me a lot and beleave it or not
thats why i go in the first place otherwise id stay home and just jerkoff to internet porn, i find it happens the most when i wear cotton jogging pants (like the ones found at any big name department store)i wear black ones with joe boxer undershorts(also black) and i go to the club and the girls take full advantage of the jogging pants :D, they even sometimes stick their hand down in there to stroke my cock and one time i was really lucky to have a stripper suck my cock in the vip section once.
oh yeah i know that most clubs may have a dress code where you live but here its not really enforced, most clubs in my area have full contact lap dancing and most girls let you touch them and i don't know if you can really call it lap dancing(more like dry humping)but in any case i don't care what its called i like it and as long as i getoff on it they can call it what ever they want, i have been to upscale clubs and they really do just kinda dance with little contact to groin area and more of the look-at-what-you-can't-have-even-if-you-could-afford-it dance but thats just fine with me since i don't really ever plan on going back to a upscale club ever again, the local lower class clubs is where all the real fun is and usually at a cheaper price.
oh and one other thing i keep hearing about this pink site, can some one PM me the url to that site?