Another one bites the dust! Bye Scrub. Hope to see you in the club!
Mate27
TUSCL’s #1 Soothsayer!
Browsing through some posts and saw people hating on a Scrub post without his signature retort. Anyway, I also see his account has vanished or been deleted. I found him to be rather humorous, unless you were someone who takes yourself seriously. The guy knows clubs, but maybe he had one too many false “club ads of the day”? I’m thinking only founder knows.
99 comments
Snazzy built his impressive numbers solely by sending creepy / weird private messages to dancers. So, net benefit there.
So, my guess is that founder got tired of his antics. But I have no idea.
"of the day"?
The problem with douchebags like desertscrub is that if someone who doesn't know about him puts in the time to do a review, and hears someone call them a liar, they probably won't do another review, and may just abandon the site.
It's hilarious that he had literally 15,000 comments (which don't even include his "Adjudications"), which you used to be able to verify if you clicked his name.
Most just said "Shill Review or Club Ad", calling everyone a liar.
If each of those comments took him 5 minutes (considering login time, searching for reviews, etc) that would work out to 146 full eight hour shifts in a job, or 29 straight weeks of full time work at a job.
Now al of that douchebags time has been completely wasted.
It's not much of a life, but it's not much of a life. It's a douche life.
I will actually miss scrubby, and all the accusations he threw at me mocking me for eating at Luby’s and being a man. But, I get it. That account has probably deterred a lot of would-have-been contributing reviewers over the years. So cie la vie
I found him amusing, and usually someone would pipe up to the insulted reviewer and explain that being accused of writing a club ad was a rite of passage. If it were up to me, I'd let him in.
If he was shown the door by founder and decides to return under a new profile, I hope that he leaves the "Angry Donald Duck" online persona behind. It was pretty tedious.
Apparently when founder boots someone their name defaults to founder.
But sometimes he was dead on with those club ads of the day. We need to fill in that void.
https://app.tuscl.net/discussion/82525
... where he rage typed at Papi to get off TUSCL because he hadn't posted a review recently.
I mean, if you're going to to be shitty to every new member, post horrible things at the dancers, discourage people from writing reviews, and then start going after the long-term members over nothing at all, then it shouldn't surprise anyone if founder reached a limit.
And we still don't know if that's what happened, but I'm not going to spend time lamenting his absence.
I think you nailed it. The unprovoked attack on Papi was over the top even for DS
I won't miss him, but there is one downside to his removal. The comments he made with adjudications now are associated to the user "tuscl" which kinda lends his stupid comments an air of credibility they didn't have when it was obviously coming from an ignorant troll.
I'll take that compared to his presence here though. Even though I had him on ignore, it was obvious his comments on reviews were deterring participation from new members without adding any value whatsoever.
Also Desertscrub vs the entire city of Providence was a good tv on here.
tuscl
A catch-all account
This account is used for storing all reviews of users who asked to be removed from this site. They're here because the reviews still provide valuable insight to the listings. Do not send messages to this account as it is not monitored.
I could add much to this conversaton but why flog a dead horse, I'll leave it at I won't miss him.
…imagine? Hah! I REMEMBER that happening to me! Hahaha
I enjoyed Scrub’s scatalogical outbursts, and always felt his heart was in the right place: he thought he was defending the site and it position as a quality informational resource. He also had a habit of accepting new viewpoints after seeing data to back up an argument. That always impressed me.
I did think that he was discouraging new reviewers though.
You never know what happens in someone’s private life, he may have had a reason to request removal.
Whoever said above that he wasn’t 10% as annoying as Icey or SJG is absolutely correct.
Oh well, time marches on…
Bada Bing
You’re just sore cause your gay bff quit you.
Are you proud to be the slowest child left on the short bus
A) Wave to him
Is that the best you’ve got because it’s pretty weak.
Over-the-years TUSCL has made room for pretty-much anyone and some people tend to take advantage of that leniency.
w.r.t. Scrub he def took things too far and seemed to more-and-more go-off-the-rails.
w.r.t. TUSCL I've always been anti-censorship and felt flame-wars should be contained to the Discussion board and reviews should not be messed with; but Scrub also wanted to fuck with the reviews that are the lifeline/main-purpose of TUSCL.
Imagine tuscl as a strip club, and you walk in, and some patron at the bar says basically "what the fuck are you doing here, twat?". I'm pretty sure the bouncer would kick that guy out.
Treat others with respect until they prove unworthy of your respect.
I've met many members here through my travels and all have been very friendly and open to sharing info. Clubbing began as a means to entertain my customers after taking them out to dinner, to becoming an actual hobby filled with enjoyable encounters and making friends who share a common interest.
Regardless of how you felt about desertscrub, you will undoubtedly admit that this forum will be different without his comments and contributions. I don't know if I can even say that about myself. His presence will be missed and I wish him all the best!
Thanks for the update @founder. You made a good choice booting his dumb ass. 🤙
1. yelled at by desertscrub when you post your first review
2. If your a stripper, get a million creep PM's from snazzyjazz or whatever the fuck his name is. Founder this dude has to go, more than anyone else. Talk about a cancer to dancers sticking around.
3. And then come to the board and read SJG's spam bullshit as far as the eye can see. As well as read wannabe gangsta ghetto fuckhead icee going full on sjw in every thread.
The thing is when people visit this site, that's their first impression and they think that's ALL of us. These guys are shitting in the punch bowl. Gotta change it up. New site, turning the page, try something new.
I saw him in a Phoenix club once. He was sitting next to me and acting like you’d expect Scrub to act. I didn’t realize it was him until I read his review from that visit.
Pretty average looking middle age guy. Treated dancers in a less than respectful way.
You’re right. It will be a lot better.
He's a big part of the reason that this board has had so little activity in New England compared to what it should have, and the douchebag has never been to New England.
He was a complete nuisance, and should have been gone years ago.
He literally had over 15,000 comments (which don't even include his "Adjudications"), which you used to be able to verify if you clicked his name.
Most just said "Shill Review or Club Ad", calling everyone a liar.
It's amazing how much damage one douche can do, and he lived to be a douche.
He always talked about being 6'5" as if that made him Billy Badass.
And with regard to anyone saying that he was cool or helpful via PM, offline, or in person, that's not actually a point in his favor. All it means is that he made a conscious and willful decision to be a prick whenever he had an audience.
And if it takes input from multiple people to help you understand that posting horrible comments to dancer photos is a shitty thing to do, then that's not exactly a sterling character reference.
Having not reviewed anything at all, I can definitively say: no.
Yes he did, and thought that being 6'5" made him equivalent to a UFC heavyweight champ. Which says he's never been in a real fight since middle school.
I don't think there were very many of either. Lots of people don't know how to jump through every one of the flaming hoops of a tuscl review or are morons or don't try very hard, but actual scammers? I haven't seen many. And actual club owners pretending to be PLs? I can think of a very few times I've seen anything like that. According to scrub though, most reviews were clubs ads, and any review by a new PL was fake. I've said before I think he really did believe he was protecting tuscl. However his radar was way way off. Plenty of times I saw reviews that tracked 100% with a club I know intimately, and scrub called them club ads. Almost every one of my early reviews got the same treatment, and I know I was telling the truth snd that I don't work for a club. If he did help by being so inaccurately overprotective, it was a tiny percent of the time. Still, I will miss his hilarious outbusrts.
I'm not sure that scrub kept very many reviews from slipping through, as there are a number of TUSCLers who approve pretty much anything.
Scrub was one of them. For quite a while, scrub would approve every single submission, either inserting a "club ad" comment along with his approval, or, once they were posted, would call the suspect ones "club ads" in the comment section after he had already approved them. He admitted doing this, saying he wanted members to see the miscreants. More than anything else, I think he did it so *he* could be seen as the One and Only Supreme Protector of TUSCL.
Think about it: If scrub wanted to tell a suspected promoter that he should contact founder and pay for an ad, he could have done that in a comment with his downvote, which would have been seen by the miscreant even if enough people rejected the review. Instead, he seemed to relish the attention of a wider audience. No matter what his motives were, the bottom line is that scrub did very little to prevent bad reviews from slipping through.
For example, I noticed that reviews can be up and down voted like discussion threads and comments. Just because a review received enough votes to get published doesn't mean it can't use a little feedback. I read over a few of the recently posted reviews and added a thumb. The comments are a little slow to post this morning so I didn't have time to do more.
Idea - what do you think of having reviews sortable by up and down votes and latest comments? Reviews with no votes get stuck in between. There's lots and lots of old reviews without votes, which is a given. But TUSCL has a recency bias anyway, and if it's sortable by recent comments then people can make older reviews that are quality easier to find (or can just bump their own regardless lol).
It's also pretty obvious that his ongoing tantrum with regards to Club Desire in Providence was fueled entirely by a need for turmoil, and not review integrity. I'm pretty sure he had that club bookmarked, because it's hard to find a Desire review that doesn't have his "feedback".
New reviewers would post at best tepid or even negative reviews of that club and he would still pounce and accuse them of being shills, managers, promoters, occasionally LEO, etc., and justifiably you'd never see a second review from that person.
If Club Desire appears to have an overinflated status on this site (and it likely does), then that's because over 90% of the reviews are from the same 6 to 8 guys who (a) really like the club and (b) figured out that Scrub's opinions were pure bombast. I'd argue that Scrub's gatekeeping accomplished the opposite of his stated goal.
I suspect that Desire's status here will actually deflate quite a bit once newer and more critical reviewers get to post and not be immediately attacked.
I like that idea.
I'd also like it if comments on reviews for clubs I had bookmarked would show in my feed.
Bippity, boppity, bacon!
"He discouraged new members.
Imagine tuscl as a strip club, and you walk in, and some patron at the bar says basically "what the fuck are you doing here, twat?". I'm pretty sure the bouncer would kick that guy out.
Treat others with respect until they prove unworthy of your respect."
Propose be written be the same length as “the Iliad; and the Odyssey”? I mean that is the true definition of Epic. I do t think you could accurately use “epic” in describing strip club adventures. Maybe I’m wrong because guys like Shadowcat who’ve done this long enough could be considered epic, but in comparison to a true epic writing like illiad and the odyssey seems to be a term that is over used. But I digress. Example, is the current inflation effects of our economy on an epic proportion, or just a momentary blip?