Married stripper tells you need use condoms.
Player11
Texas
You met her when she was engaged to Steve (her 3rd husband and HS sweetheart when she was cheerleader in HS in Idaho). He even proposed to her on a mountain then. You never had a gf in HS let alone a CL.
You been doing her otc and itc pay4play. Approaching 100 sessions. She says “you need to use condoms because you don’t look like Steve”. You have always used condoms with her. What wb your thoughts on this?
You been doing her otc and itc pay4play. Approaching 100 sessions. She says “you need to use condoms because you don’t look like Steve”. You have always used condoms with her. What wb your thoughts on this?
28 comments
But it just seems like a no win situation being jn a p4p relationship with a married woman that long
Not sure what the point of this insert was, but I will say that I'm sorry that your HS experience sucked so much.
===> "She says “you need to use condoms because you don’t look like Steve”. You have always used condoms with her. What wb your thoughts on this?"
She's trying to get pregnant with Steve and doesn't want to have your kid instead. I'm guessing that it feels a bit like an extension of your HS rejections and in one sense maybe it is. Only you can decide how you process that.
But in another sense you should probably be grateful. Anyone who marries and then impregnates a headcase stripper who has already been divorced twice and has been fucking for $ is getting the shitty end of the life stick. He just doesn't know it yet.
Another wise statement by Rick D. Unfortunately I’m guessing she’s probably good looking so the hubby thinks he has won the jackpot and is willing (for now) to put up with the BS that he actually knows about. Contributing with the assumption that she’s hit the OP is willing to put up with her BS as well.
As far as the fatherhood thing in Florida, I'm pretty sure Rick's correct. However, presumption is a key word. There are a number of avenues for the husband to prove he was not the father, for the mother to prove someone else was, and even some for the actual father to prove he was. It's not like you can knock up a married woman and and have zero chance of being responsible for the child or that your 100% responsible to support someone else's child. The presumption just determines where the burden of proof lies. Kinda like you're presumed innocent but can still be proven guilty.
Get my legal advice on Google!!
You know what they say: the client who has Google for their lawyer is a fool.
(Then again, a person who has Google for their websearch site is probably a fool too!)
Guy’s love getting OPP.
Idaho cheerleader?
I’ll take UCLA for $1000, Alex
https://images.app.goo.gl/N8zh81MXgSetQv…
https://i.pinimg.com/originals/57/0b/93/…
From my understanding, in many places the presumption is only rebuttable if there is another man ready to step in and claim responsibility for the child and the mother is onboard. Otherwise the courts are generally disinclined to let the husband off the hook for the kid's welfare, regardless of biological paternity.
Also she would do nude lappers w me nude on couch then w her back turned lower her butt so her pussy almost touching my hard cock. All I had to do would be shove it in, fuk hell outta her fill her w cum. But the dance would stop then would expertly put rubber on me fuk me sitting in my lap on couch fuking me. I Would literally explode few minutes later, the joy of housewife pussy. She so good at fuking.
Probably. If I had to guess, she was probably saying the same thing to all her Johns. At some point in her p4p career I'm guessing that, when faced with the prospect of losing the money of a guy who balked at a condom, she decided to let him just stick it in.
She also may have a std.