The bare look
happylap
Michigan
I was reading some of the posts on Chitown's topic "Favorite porn stars". I don't know many of those names so I google-searched a few. Seemed like Nikki Dail's name was mentioned several times so she was one of the first one's I (g)oogled. I noticed that, in the photos I saw, she had pretty much a full beaver. I like that. Seems like in most of the porn I see these days the babes are shaved (or waxed) clean. (I admit that the only porn I see these days is on the internet and it's usualy "amatuer" porn. I don't rent or go to theaters.) What's wrong with pubic hair? Some of the European girls have plenty of it. I don't care for hairy legs and armpits but I like a little bush in the crotch. What do you guys think? Am I an old fogey?
20 comments
Three weeks ago, in a hotel room above the Adelita Bar in Tijuana, a 19 year old fully shaven chica gave me a lecture on the health benefits of being shaven--although my 43 year old physician wife has never adopted the practice, paradoxically.
I don't think there are health benefits to shaving the pubes, necessarily. The hairs are there for a reason -- whatever bacteria or pests they might harbor, could be a detriment to hairiness; but likewise, an absence of hair might enable certain other infections or problems in a different manner.
I like LOOKING at bare women. It's a visual thing -- more eye access. The older "vintage" porn (1970s or 80s VCR tapes now available on the 'net) is mildly less exciting to me partly because the hairy pussies just make it hard to see what's going on.
But fucking them, the hair is a different and very positive thing. As long as it isn't so much of a thatch that it gets in the way, or somehow clogs up the opening -- which can happen if it curls the wrong way -- then it's again "animalistic" and therefore sexy, to me.
Book Guy mentions it's a "visual thing." How true. Somehow the hair makes the pussy visually more inviting. What is exciting about the "bare look"? It's just folds of skin.