>Previously a federal court judge had concluded the ban was based on 'negative stereotypes depicting women's breasts,
There are negative stereotypes of women's tits? I thought it was a law to keep men from walking around like drooling idiots all day.
If it catches on it will just serve to de-sexualize the female breast. Think about it. Go to any mall in any town USA, stand in the food court for 10 minutes looking around, now imagine all those women topless. Do you really think you would be turned on? Those are the same women that are going to be at the park and the beach.
Many years ago the same thing was said in Fort Lauderdale when the babes who rent beach chairs and umbrellas went topless. The number of accidents on A1A eventually made them think otherwise.
"Be careful what you wish for."
"Typically, it seems like the women who embrace these laws are rarely the ones I want to embrace these laws..."
"Do you really think you would be turned on?"
In my eyes female-breasts are sexual and to me it doesn't feel natural for women to be in public-places w/ their breasts exposed - I don't buy the argument that women's chests and men's chest are the same-thing - I assume it's b/c I was raised in sexually-uptight US and perhaps places in Europe that is completely normal and not much of a second-thought is given to it - I'm kinda leaning towards it feeling abnormal-to-me due to being raised in this culture (US).
I would def like seeing more breasts exposed in public - I personally don't buy into the argument that one will only see the dogs with them exposed - that would be analogous to not wanting to SC b/c there are dancers in the club(s) that are not to my liking.
Awesome!
But probably it still won't be legal for them to go topless in Santa Clara County's Strip Clubs w/ alcohol.
SJG
Ricks act and then think later. So yes, they are influenced by Rick Dugan. They believe that they are Dugan.
And due to psychological and medical torture, Dugan believes that he is a Rick. He is not, he is a hairless ape. He is the Last Man.
This is the best information to date as to who and what the Ricks are:
[view link]
The Rolling Stones Live In Paris Full Concert 2018
[view link]
Sexiest Ladies of Jazz
[view link]
Me and my friend came up with a term for girls walking around in sexy outfits...
"Driving hazards."
Lmao.
I have mixed feelings. On one hand, yay for half naked girls. On another hand, yuck fatty hippo boobs. On another hand, will those girls yell at me if I'm caught staring? Will I be able to remotely pay attention in class if there are sexy girls everywhere and will I crash my car if I can't stop staring at the 8/10 walking on the road in a miniskirt?
But to top it all off? Is it all worth it to see some sexy, half naked girls?
I can't decide.
Awesome. Hopefully California is added to the list soon so that San Jose Guy can see live breasts for the first time, provided the basement bedroom has a window.
@skibum: "Sure it is just an hysterical coincidence"
Congratulations on your correct usage of an indefinite article. :)
What amuses me about this whole situation is that it's yet another attempt by some people to claim that breasts shouldn't be sexualized, denying hundreds of thousands of years of evolution because they want something to be so.
While it's true that the *primary* purpose of women's breasts isn't sexual, it's to feed infants, their *secondary* purpose is most definitely sexual.
No other modern primate on the planet has the large breasts that human females do, rather they have accentuated *buttocks*. Homo Sapiens' predecessors didn't start out that way either. Why? Because the vast majority of sexual couplings among other modern primates, and early Homo whatevers, are some variation of "doggy style", and the enlarged buttocks visible from the rear serve as a sexual stimulant for males.
Among humans though, face to face coupling is far more common, and so enlarged breasts evolved to serve the same sexual stimulation purpose for face to face sex as enlarged buttocks do for rear entry sex. In addition, humans walk in a much more upright position than do the other primates, so having a sexual stimulation in view while upright was probably a factor in breast evolution as well.
So all of that "breasts aren't sexual" bologna is just that, baloney.
The whole thing about "desexualizing" the female body is retarded. Girls bodies are inherently sexual, that's why we get boners upon seeing them. I would think that is common sense but feminists completely lack it so I guess I'm not surprised.
I like to scuttle across the boobs of the sexy hairless ape females. I am pro free the nipple as long as the uggos are forbidden to bare their nips. Scuttle! Scuttle!
27 comments