Worthy of a review ?

22 comments

• Papi_Chulo

  •

  5 years ago

  Seems like a rant of a minor incident - c'mon - why is this being approved?
  
  
• Chili Palmer

  •

  5 years ago

  Because it speaks to the attitude of dancers as well as the paucity of same at a time when some might be interested. Again, why the fuck do you care so much? This is a more than valid review of his specific experience.
• Papi_Chulo

  •

  5 years ago

  ^ Take the dildo out of your ass - it's making you irritated
• gSteph

  •

  5 years ago

  Yep, not much there. Some one was a jerk and I left. Ok.
• Jascoi

  •

  5 years ago

  Yeah. still should give the cost of entry and the cost of a drink (if any) even though obviously it was a very short visit.
• Jascoi

  •

  5 years ago

  and the bar and restroom location .
• future POTUS and Senator in training

  •

  5 years ago

  Do you know that you're one of the most poupular ppl here @chulo
  
  
• san_jose_guy

  •

  5 years ago

  Papi is most deservedly very well liked.
  
  SJG
• Papi_Chulo

  •

  5 years ago

  I don't mind being disagreed with but do mind being fucked-with
• TFP

  •

  5 years ago

  Chili Palmer we get it, you don't like the site. You don't like the direction Founder has taken it, fine. Kick rocks then. No need to take any harsh ass tones over why we care. Because we do, simple as that. The review still got voted in and since you say it was passible you should be happy that the review process worked. It's too bad because I liked your input and your stories in the past. But it seems these days all you do is come and berate the site and users who still give a damn. You don't care to share your wisdom anymore with us, that's your choice.
  
  As for this review I agree with Papi. It's a story about a minor little spat and that's it. And it speaks for the attitude of ONE dancer, not all of them. Even if there were only 5, the other four could have been much nicer but we wouldn't know from this guy. All it tells us is that this particular daytime at Rhino was pretty dead, there's a bar and a bunch of tables. What the fuck good is that?
  
  
• Icey

  •

  5 years ago

  I rejected a few reviews that were just complaints as well. They could have written it up as a review and included some constructive criticism, instead its just a childish bitter rant
• rickdugan

  •

  5 years ago

  Idk. There was some intel to be had, so I might have approved it. Very borderline. Though in the end what might have tilted the scale towards rejection is not wanting to give a whiny bitch any sort of approval.
• Liwet

  •

  5 years ago

  Didn't even give the girl's name.
• wallanon

  •

  5 years ago

  I read this one in the unpublished section and downvoted it, but in the time I wrote the comment to go with it the submission got enough yes votes to post.
• minnow

  •

  5 years ago

  Wall, you just made a case for keeping the check box system. I've seen so many flaky reviews squeak by with 3-2 votes, that I bet some snowflake clicked the approve before reject voter could finish their comment, thus putting marginal review over the top.
• datinman

  •

  5 years ago

  I don't have a problem with a rant being published, but to me this was incoherent. I really don't know what his complaint was. He is sitting solo at a table for four and she took one of the empty chairs? or did she take a seat in his vicinity giving him an opportunity to interact if he chose to? Why would you get bent out of shape over a chair you're not using. What am I missing?
• TFP

  •

  5 years ago

  @justintolook how I interpreted it was he was at a table for four, she took one of the other chairs at his same table and turned it around so her back was to him and facing the girls at the adjacent table talking to them. I guess he got upset that she was used a chair from his table to talk instead of a chair from another nearby unoccupied table? Wouldn't have bothered me but hey, we're all different.
  
  Still, IMO this is not a review.
• flagooner

  •

  5 years ago

  I'd rate that review a 6
• Liwet

  •

  5 years ago

  Should probably be a minimum amount of time before it's posted so it has time to garner more rejections or approvals.
• minnow

  •

  5 years ago

  @Liwet- The standard for review to be published (in place since May, I think) is 5 "looks", of which 3 must hit the green "Publish" dot. So even if the 1st 3 publishers voted to publish, it must get 2 more "looks" to be published. Thus you will always see 5 votes- may go 5-0, 4-1, or 3-2 in favor of submitted review.
• Clubber

  •

  5 years ago

  Personally, an easy reject for me.
• Member6532

  •

  5 years ago

  Not a review, it's a story and a bad story.