How to rate women. I was going to eventually get around to posting this but after just now commenting in the Perfect 10 thread I figured I'd stick around and post it now.
Take it anyway you'd like to.. fact, fiction, comedy, entertainment.
Front Room
14 comments
The /fit/ scale for rating girls v2.0
Jan 6, 2019, 7:53 PM
comments (14)
Jump to latest
Seems pretty well thought out. Pretty much anything below 6 is a no go. 7+ is preferred.
Not showing 10s makes sense. At that point beauty is in the eye of the beholder.
I prefer a binary system, women are a 1 or 0. Either you'd fuck her or you wouldn't. I think those of us who go to strip clubs would add a 2 to our list: girls that we'd buy a lap dance from.
-->"Not showing 10s makes sense. At that point beauty is in the eye of the beholder."
Dushku limit, and all that.
The only reason I use ratings at all is to communicate with other guys; otherwise, it's just all about how she makes me feel. I do somewhat enjoy seeing what the rest of the world thinks of my tastes, which is something I get to see first-hand when we're OTC. As I've said before, my three general categories are: 1. head-turner (guys turn their head to watch her, pretty often), 2. wave-starter (so many guys turn their heads, that in a crowded bar, I can see where she is from across the room by watching the wave as guys re-orient themselves as she passes), and 3. Wooo! (decently often, guys let out noises, stop their friends to point her out, or even say things to me as we pass). I don't have a name for girls who don't at least turn heads here and there; I figure that's basically anyone below a 7.5? 7?
I sort of lost faith in a numbering system when I was on TER. There was a number for looks and another for performance. I was convinced the performance number heavily influenced the looks number. That’s understandable in a sense but it also made the rating system seem too subjective to be much help.
I know there are women I wouldn't buy a dance from, women I wouldn't date (pro or civilian), and women I would.
I'm a sucker for a nice long legs and a peach for a butt. The whole junk in the trunk craze never did much for me but to each his own and as long as you are satisfied why does it matter.
Most guys can agree overall on women in the 4 to 7 range. At the extreme ends of the bell curve (absolute 1 and absolute 10) its extremely subjective and there's little agreement. It's very rare that I'll refer to any dancer as a 10. That's rainbow unicorn territory.
In my reviews, I use a short code to break out face and body. So, F6B8 = Face 6; Body 8. Still subjective, but it works for me. There's no getting around personal tastes.
Not me DC---regardless of the site ( and I was on TER for a short period of time) but you are correct, especially in the DC area where there were actual social parties that you could/would run into the person you just gave a low rating.
Of course that was why I quit very quickly I should add attending socials---not to mention the other risk involved.
Tastes definitely vary. A few of those 6s I would jump on hard. Splitting between 8 and 9 is also rough, I could probably shuffle all the 8s and 9s randomly and not get many complaints.
A lot of the women I've fucked in my life would be 6s on this scale with some 7s and a couple 8s
Ishmael, any argument below a 4 is purely academic.
Dc, you are correct about TER. Anything less than a 7 seemed to have become an absolute insult and had the potential for negative consequences for both parties.
One funny example, I knew an escort there that had two profiles. She was a model in real life, btw. She had a profile as a body rub girl and was rated 7.5 in looks under that profile. As an full service, big menu escort, the same girl at the same time rated a 9.5.
You guys should post pics so you can get rated.
@jamesSD... You're not wrong.
I'll send pics to any verified dancer, trapbaby.
Many thoughts pop up when I see this. One is do we have a male version so I know where I really stand? :) The other is I'm somewhat relieved that every girl I have ever had sex with was at least a 6. One other thought is that I have seen many girls in life who were far more attractive than the 9's on this and not because of the niche thing, but definitely more gorgeous than these. Not saying the world is full of them but the upper limit on this visual chart is cutting short a bit.